Journal of Mathematical Chemistry

, Volume 27, Issue 1–2, pp 71–88 | Cite as

Chemical systems consisting only of elementary steps – a paradigma for nonlinear behavior

  • Thomas Wilhelm
Article

Abstract

We present a new analytic method which allows one to interpret a mass‐action kinetic reaction of arbitrary molecularity as the limit case of a sequence of bimolecular steps. Together with other technics (transformation of an arbitrary ODE into a polynomial ODE [8]; transformation of a polynomial ODE into a form which can be interpreted as a mass‐action kinetic system [10]), it is thus possible to construct an at most bimolecular mass‐action kinetic system with the same dynamic behavior as an arbitrary ODE. Furthermore, we demonstrate necessary improvements of the transformation given in [10]. Is is also shown that an arbitrary single mass‐action kinetic reaction can be understood as a sequence of two reactions with a short‐living intermediate. In particular, it therefore follows that an autocatalytic reaction can always be approximated by two nonautocatalytic ones without changing the dynamics of the whole system.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    K. Alhumaizi and R. Aris, Surveying a Dynamical System: A Study of the Gray–Scott Reaction in a Two-phase Reactor (Longman, 1995).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    W.C. Bray, A periodic chemical reaction and its mechanism, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 43 (1921) 1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    G.B. Cook, P. Gray, D.G. Knapp and S.K. Scott, Bimolecular routes to cubic autocatalysis, J. Phys. Chem. 93 (1989) 2749–2755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    I.R. Epstein, Oscillations and chaos in chemical systems, Physica D 7 (1983) 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Escher, Bifurcation and coexistence of several limit cycles in models of open two-variable quadratic mass-action systems, Chem. Phys. 63 (1981) 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R.J. Field and R.M. Noyes, Oscillations in chemical systems. IV. Limit cycle behavior in a model of a real chemical reaction, J. Chem. Phys. 60(5) (1974) 1877–1884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Glansdorff and I. Prigogine, Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations (Wiley, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E.N. Kerner, Universal formats for nonlinear ordinary differential systems, J. Math. Phys. 22 (1981) 1366–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    G.A.M. King, Reactions for chemical systems far from equilibrium, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 79 (1983) 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. Kowalski, Universal formats for nonlinear dynamical systems, Chem. Phys. Lett. 209 (1993) 167–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A.J. Lotka, Zur Theorie der periodischen Reaktionen, Z. Physik. Chem. 72 (1910) 508–511.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A.J. Lotka, Undamped oscillations derived from the law of mass action, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 42 (1920) 1595–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    I. Prigogine and R. Lefever, Symmetry breaking instabilities in dissipative systems II, J. Chem. Phys. 48(4) (1968) 1695–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    N. Samardzija, L.D. Greller and E. Wasserman, Nonlinear chemical kinetic schemes derived from mechanical and electrical dynamical systems, J. Chem. Phys. 90(4) (1989) 2296–2304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    K.R. Schneider and T. Wilhelm, Model reduction by extended quasi-steady-state approximation, J. Math. Biol. 40(5) (2000) 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. Sparrow, The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos and Strange Attractors, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 41 (Springer, 1982).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J.C. Sprott, Some simple chaotic flows, Phys. Rev. E 50(2) (1994) R647-R650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    J.C. Sprott, Simplest dissipative chaotic flow, Phys. Lett. A 228 (1997) 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    V. Volterra, Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically, Nature 118 (1926) 558–560.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    T. Wilhelm and P. Hänggi, What can be stated by the Glansdorff–Prigogine criterion concerning the stability of mass-action kinetic systems, J. Chem. Phys. 110 (1999) 6128–6134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    T. Wilhelm and R. Heinrich, Smallest chemical reaction system with Hopf bifurcation, J. Math. Chem. 17 (1995) 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    T. Wilhelm and R. Heinrich, Mathematical analysis of the smallest chemical reaction system with Hopf bifurcation, J. Math. Chem. 19 (1996) 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A.N. Zaikin and A.M. Zhabotinsky, Concentration wave propagation in two-dimensional liquid-phase self-oscillating systems, Nature 225 (1970) 535–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Wilhelm

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations