Advertisement

Information Technology and Management

, Volume 1, Issue 1–2, pp 1–23 | Cite as

A theoretical and empirical investigation of multi‐item on‐line auctions

  • Ravi Bapna
  • Paulo Goes
  • Alok Gupta
Article

Abstract

In this paper we explore and analyze the structure of Internet auctions from an analytical and an empirical perspective. Such web‐based auctions are rapidly emerging as a mercantile process of choice in the electronic marketplace. We observe current Internet auctions for one‐time products, such as rapidly aging hardware, and analyze them within the framework of the existing auction theory. While traditional auction theory focuses on single‐item auctions, we observe that a majority of on‐line auctions are multi‐item auctions. A significant contribution of this work is the theoretical derivation of the structure of the winning bids in multi‐item progressive on‐line auctions. Additionally, for comparative purposes, we explore the structural characteristics of alternative multi‐item auction mechanisms proposed in the auction theory. We derive hypotheses based on our analytical results and compare two different types of auction mechanisms. We test the traditional auction theory assumption regarding the homogeneity of bidders and present the first ever empirically derived classification and performance‐comparison of on‐line bidders. We test our hypotheses using real‐world empirical data obtained by tracking a premier web‐based auction site. Statistical analysis of the data indicates that firms may gain by choosing alternative auction mechanisms. We also provide directions for further exploration of this emerging but important dimension of electronic commerce.

auction theory on‐line auctions multi‐item auctions and electronic markets 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C. Baker, Auctioning coupon-bearing securities: A review of treasury experience, in: Bidding and Auctioning for Procurement and Allocation, ed. Y. Amihud (NYU Press, New York, 1976) pp. 146–154.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Greenwood and R.P. McAfee, Externalities and asymmetric information, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1991) 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Gupta, A.D.O. Stahl and A.B. Whinston, A stochastic equilibrium model of Internet pricing, Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control 21 (1997) 697–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Harris and A. Raviv, Allocation mechanism and the design of auctions, Econometrica 49 (1981) 1477–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R.P. McAfee and J. McMillan, Auctions and bidding, Journal of Economic Literature 25 (1987) 699–738.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    P. Milgrom, Auctions and bidding: A primer, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (1989) 3–22.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R.B. Myerson, Optimal auction design, Mathematics of Operations Research 6 (1981) 58–73.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. Plott and V.L. Smith, Experimental examination of two exchange institutions, The Review of Economic Studies 45 (1978) 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M.H. Rothkopf and R.M. Harstad, Modeling competitive bidding: A critical essay, Management Science 40 (1994) 364–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M.H. Rothkopf and R.M. Harstad, On the role of discrete bid levels in oral auctions, European Journal of Operations Research 74 (1994) 572–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    E. Van Heck and P. Vervest, How should CIO's deal with web-based auctions? Communications of the ACM 41 (1998) 99–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    W. Vickrey, Counter-speculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders, Journal of Finance 41 (1961) 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Wang, Auctions versus posted-price selling, The American Economic Review 84 (1993) 838–851.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ravi Bapna
    • 1
  • Paulo Goes
    • 1
  • Alok Gupta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Operations and Information Management, School of Business AdministrationUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations