Health Care Management Science

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 269–277 | Cite as

Medical malpractice among physicians: Who will be sued and who will pay?

  • Derek A. Weycker
  • Gail A. Jensen


This paper examines whether a physician's future claims of medical malpractice are predictable from information on the physician's recent claims history, training credentials, practice characteristics, and demographics. Data on the medical malpractice experience of 8,733 Michigan physicians between 1980 and 1989 is analyzed. We find strong evidence of repetition over time regarding who was sued and who paid claims. The worse a physician's malpractice litigation record during 1980–1984, the worse was his record during 1985–1989. Training credentials were also highly predictive of future malpractice experience. Physicians trained at lower ranked medical schools or who went through lower-ranked residency programs faced higher odds of developing adverse malpractice records, even after controlling for their previous litigation record. Growing internet access to information on these characteristics will help inform prospective patients if they wish to avoid physicians likely to be sued and likely to make payments in the future for malpractice.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    J. Androshick, A cybercheck on Dr. X, Forbes (22 February 1999).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T.A. Brennan et al., Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patiens. Results of the Harvard medical practice study I, New England Journal of Medicine 324 (1991) 370–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A.R. Localio et al., Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard medical practice study III, New England Journal of Medicine 325 (1991) 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    F.A. Sloan and T.J. Hoerger, Uncertainty, information, and resolution of medical malpractice disputes, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4 (1991) 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    H.S. Farber and M.J. White, Medical malpractice: An empirical examination of the litigation process, Rand Journal of Economics 22 (1991) 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M.I. Taragin et al., The influence of standard of care and severity of injury on the resolution of medical malpractice claims, Annals of Internal Medicine 117 (1992) 780–784.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E.J. Metter, R.L. Granville and M.J. Kussman, The effect of threshold amounts for reporting malpractice payments to the national practitioner data bank: Analysis using the closed claims data base of the office of the assistant secretary of defense, Military Medicine 162 (1997) 257–261.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    R.R. Bovbjerg and K.P. Petronis, The relationship between physicians' malpractice claims history and later claims: Does the past predict the future?, Journal of the American Medical Association 272 (1994) 1421–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    F.A. Sloan et al., Medical malpractice experience of physicians: Predictable or haphazard?, Journal of the American Medical Association 262 (1989) 3291–3297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    G.A. Jensen, S.J. Spurr, D.A. Weycker and M. Bulycheva, Physicians and the risk of medical malpractice: The role of prior litigation in predicting the future, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 39 (1999) 267–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J.E. Rolph, D. Pekelney and K. McGuigan, Amending the national practitioner data bank reporting requirements: Are small claims predictive of large claims?, Inquiry 30 (1993) 441–446.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Pretzer, Is the malpractice data bank going public?, Medical Economics (26 September 1994) 80.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    L.E. Smarr, Commentary, malpractice claims: does the past predict the future?, Journal of the American Medical Association 272 (1994) 1453–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    T.E. Adamson, J.M. Tschann, D.S. Gullion and A.A. Oppenberg, Physician communication skills and malpractice claims: A complex relationship, Western Journal of Medicine 150 (1989) 356–360.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    G.B. Hickson et al., Obstetricians' prior malpractice experience and patients' satisfaction with care, Journal of the American Medical Association 272 (1994) 1583–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    W. Levinson et al., Physician-patient communication: The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons, Journal of the American Medical Association 277 (1977) 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    S.S. Entman et al., The relationship between malpractice claims history and subsequent obstetric care, Journal of the American Medical Association 272 (1994) 1588–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    W. Levinson, Reply to: Malpratice, patient satisfaction, and physician-patient communication, Journal of the American Medical Association 274 (1995) 23–24.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    W. Levinson, Physician-patient communication: A key to malpractice prevention, Journal of the American Medical Association 272 (1994) 1619–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. Gourman, The Gourman Report: A Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities, 1st ed. (National Education Standards, Los Angeles, 1980).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    American Medical Association (AMA), Data from the Medical Education Research and Information Database (AMA, Chicago, 1994).Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    M.I. Taragin et al., Physician demographics and the risk of medical malpractice, American Journal of Medicine 93 (1992) 537–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    M.L. May and D.B. Stengel, Who sues their doctor? How patients handle medical grievances, Law and Sociological Review 24 (1990) 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    G.B. Hickson, E.W. Clayton, P.B. Githens and F.A. Sloan, Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries, Journal of the American Medical Association 267 (1992) 1359–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    H.B. Beckman, K.M. Markakis, A.L. Suchman and R.M. Frankel, The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice: Lessons from plaintiff depositions, Archives of Internal Medicine 154 (1994) 1365–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek A. Weycker
    • 1
  • Gail A. Jensen
    • 2
  1. 1.Policy Analysis Inc.BrooklineUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Gerontology and Department of EconomicsWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations