Advertisement

Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 11, Issue 9, pp 1306–1314 | Cite as

Hindered Diffusion of Polar Molecules Through and Effective Pore Radii Estimates of Intact and Ethanol Treated Human Epidermal Membrane

  • Kendall D. Peck
  • Abdel-Halim Ghanem
  • William I. Higuchi
Article

Abstract

The in vitro passive transport of urea, mannitol, sucrose and raffinose across intact and ethanol treated human epidermal membrane was investigated. The intent of this study was to characterize the barrier properties and permeation pathways of these membranes for polar permeants under passive conditions. Based upon the relative permeabilities of these four solutes and hindered diffusion theory, the experimental data was adequately modeled for both membrane systems according to permeation through a porous membrane. Effective pore radii estimates for intact human epidermal membrane fell between 15 Å to 25 Å while similar estimates fell compactly between 15 Å to 20 Å for ethanol treated human epidermal membrane. Similarities between the relative permeabilities of human epidermal membrane for the four permeants studied and the relative permeabilities of these same permeants through ethanol pretreated human epidermal membrane indicate that significant similarities exist between the permeation pathways for both membrane systems. The results of this study have important implications for transdermal drug delivery in general and more specifically for strategies of designing effective chemical permeation enhancement systems.

human epidermal membrane skin permeability transdermal delivery permeation enhancers hindered diffusion stratum corneum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    R. J. Scheuplein and I. H. Blank. Permeability of skin. Physiol. Rev. 51:702–747 (1971).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. S. Michaels, S. K. Chandrasekaran, and J. E. Shaw. Drug permeation through human skin: Theory and in vitro experimental measurement. AIChE J. 21:985–996 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. V. Raykar, M. C. Fung, and B. D. Anderson. The role of protein and lipid domains in the uptake of solutes by human stratum corneum. Pharm. Res. 5:140–150 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Hatanaka, M. Shimoyama, K. Sugibayashi, and Y. Morimoto. Effect of vehicle on the skin permeability of drugs: Polyethylene glycol 400-water and ethanol-water binary solvents. J. Controlled Release 23:247–260 (1993).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Ackermann, G. L. Flynn, and W. M. Smith. Ether-water partitioning and permeability through nude mouse skin in vitro. II. Hydrocortisone 21-n-alkyl esters, alkanols and hydrophilic compounds. Int. J. Pharm. 36:67–71 (1987).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. H. Kim, A. H. Ghanem, H. Mahmoud, and W. I. Higuchi. Short chain alkanols as transport enhancers for lipophilic and polar/ionic permeants in hairless mouse skin: Mechanism(s) of action. Int. J. Pharm. 80:17–31 (1992).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. O. Potts and R. H. Guy. Predicting skin permeability. Pharm. Res. 9:663–669 (1992).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Srinivasan, W. I. Higuchi, S. M. Sims, A. H. Ghanem, and C. R. Behl. Transdermal iontophoretic drug delivery. Mechanistic analysis and application to polypeptide delivery. J. Pharm. Sci. 78:370–375 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Kurihara-Bergstrom, K. Knutson, L. J. DeNoble, and C. Y. Goates. Percutaneous absorption enhancement of an ionic molecule by ethanol-water systems in human skin. Pharm. Res. 7:762–766 (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. A. Cornwell and B. W. Barry. The routes of penetration of ions and 5-fluorouracil across human skin and the mechanisms of action of terpene skin penetration enhancers. Int. J. Pharm. 94:189–194 (1993).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. M. Tuvunen, S. Buyuktimkin, N. Buyuktimkin, A. Urtti, P. Paronen, and J. H. Rytting. Enhanced delivery of 5-fluorouracil through shed snake skin by two new transdermal penetration enhancers. Int. J. Pharm. 92:89–95 (1993).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. B. Ruddy and B. W. Hadzija. Iontophoretic permeability of polyethylene glycols through hairless rat skin: Application of hydrodynamic theory for hindered transport through liquid-filled pores. Drug Design and Discovery 8:207–224 (1992).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. M. Sims, W. I. Higuchi, and V. Srinivasan. Skin alteration and convective solvent flow effects during iontophoresis: I. Neutral solute transport across human skin. Int. J. Pharm. 69:109–121 (1991).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. C. Keister and G. B. Kasting. A kinetic model for ion transport across skin. J. Membrane Sci. 71:257–271 (1992).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Inada, A. H. Ghanem, and W. I. Higuchi. Studies on the effects of applied voltage and duration on human epidermal membrane alteration/recovery and the resultant effects upon iontophoresis. Pharm. Res. 11:687–697 (1994).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. J. Pikal and S. Shah. Transport mechanisms in iontophoresis. III. An experimental study of the contributions of electroosmotic flow and permeability change in transport of low and high molecular weight solutes. Pharm. Res. 7:222–229 (1990).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. M. Deen. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores. AIChE J. 33:1409–1425 (1987).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. E. Beck and J. S. Schultz. Hindrance of solute diffusion within membranes as measured with microporous membranes of known pore geometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 255:272–303 (1972).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. A. Conradi, A. R. Hilgers, N. F. H. Ho, and P. S. Burton. The influence of peptide structure on transport across caco-2 cells. Pharm. Res. 8:1453–1459 (1991).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. Inamori, A. H. Ghanem, W. I. Higuchi, and V. Srinivasan. Macromolecular transport in and effective pore size of ethanol pretreated human epidermal membrane. Int. J. Pharm. 105:113–123 (1994).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. M. Deen, M. P. Bohrer, and N. B. Epstein. Effect of molecular size and configuration on diffusion in microporous membranes. AIChE J. 27:952–959 (1981).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    K. D. Peck, A. H. Ghanem, W. I. Higuchi, and V. Srinivasan. Improved stability of the human epidermal membrane during successive permeability experiments. Int. J. Pharm. 98:141–147 (1993).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Liu, J. A. S. Nightingale, and T. Kurihara-Bergstrom. Variation of human skin permeation in vitro: Ionic vs neutral compounds. Int. J. Pharm. 90:171–176 (1993).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. M. Sims, W. I. Higuchi, V. Srinivasan, and K. Peck. Ionic partition coefficients and electroosmotic flow in cylindrical pores: Comparison of the predictions of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation with experiment. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 155:210–220 (1993).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. A. Gierer and K. Wirtz. Molekulare theorie der mikroreibung. Z. Naturforsch. 8a:532–538 (1953).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Leo, C. Hansch and D. Elkins. Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem. Rev. 71:525–616 (1971).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. D. Stein. Transport and Diffusion Across Cell Membranes, Academic Press, Orlando, 1986.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. M. Golden, D. B. Guzek, A. H. Kennedy, J. E. Mckie, and R. O. Potts. Stratum corneum lipid phase transitions and water barrier properties. Biochem. 26:2382–2388 (1986).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. R. Scott, A. I. Laplaza, H. S. White, and J. B. Phipps. Transport of ionic species in skin: Contribution of pores to the overall skin conductance. Pharm. Res. 10:1699–1709 (1993).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    G. B. Kasting and L. A. Bowman. Electrical analysis of fresh, excised human skin: A comparison with frozen skin. Pharm. Res. 7:1141–1146 (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kendall D. Peck
    • 1
  • Abdel-Halim Ghanem
    • 1
  • William I. Higuchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical ChemistryUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations