Advertisement

Pharmaceutical Research

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 215–219 | Cite as

An Electrically Modulated Drug Delivery Device. II. Effect of Ionic Strength, Drug Concentration, and Temperature

  • Antony D'Emanuele
  • John N. Staniforth
Article

Abstract

The effects of various physicochemical parameters on the changes in drug delivery rate produced by an electrophoretic current are examined using a model system. It was shown that ionic strength has an inverse relationship with the change in delivery rate produced by a given current. Small changes in pH were measured during electrophoresis experiments which were considered to be insignificant. Drug reservoir concentration selection is critical in the design of an electrophoretic device and is based on achieving a balance between providing a suitable reservoir and allowing adequate electrophoretic control. Electrophoretic control is affected by temperature in a manner which can be predicted using the Arrhenius relationship. The low power requirements of the model system demonstrate the feasibility of using the principle of electrophoresis to control drug delivery rates in a therapeutic system.

electrophoresis electrically modulated drug delivery device chronotherapeutics ionic strength drug concentration temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    A. D'Emanuele and J. N. Staniforth. An electrically modulated drug delivery device. I. Pharm. Res. 8:913–918 (1991).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Reinberg. New concepts in chronopharmacology. News Physiol. Sci. 3:84–88 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. H. Staudinger. V. Chronopharmacology as a rationale for the development of controlled release products. Paperback APV 22:83–97 (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. K. Banga and Y. W. Chien. Systemic delivery of therapeutic peptides and proteins. Int. J. Pharm. 48:15–50 (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. G. Pitt. The controlled parenteral delivery of polypeptides and proteins. Int. J. Pharm. 59:173–196 (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pharmaceutical Handbook, Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martindale. The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 28th ed., Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Lescure, R. Gurny, E. Doelker, and J. Augustynski. In vitro evaluation of a new electrophoretically controlled drug delivery system based on a crosslinked gel. Proc. Int. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 15:362–363 (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. A. Robinson and R. H. Stokes. Electrolyte Solutions, Butterworths, London, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Kumar. A Study of Low Voltage Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis as a Means of Providing Controlled Drug Release, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bath, Bath, 1986.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. R. Maurer. Disc Electrophoresis and Related Techniques of Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antony D'Emanuele
    • 1
  • John N. Staniforth
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Pharmacy and PharmacologyUniversity of BathBath, AvonUK

Personalised recommendations