Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 73, Issue 0, pp 141–155 | Cite as

A new measure of baseball batters using DEA

  • Timothy R. Anderson
  • Gunter P. Sharp
Article

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to create an alternative to traditional batting statistics called the Composite Batter Index (CBI). Advantages of CBI over traditional statistics include the fact that players are judged on the basis of what they accomplish relative to other players and that it automatically accounts for changing conditions of the game that raise or lower batting statistics. Historical results are examined to show how the industry of baseball batting has matured and potential uses of CBI are discussed. The application of baseball suggests that random variation may have an effect on CBI. We investigated this effect by creating noisy data sets based on actual data sets and then compared the results, which revealed a negative bias in the majority of cases. We then present and test an extension to DEA for mitigating this effect of noise in evaluating a batter's true "skill".

DEA noise baseball 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A.I. Ali, W.D. Cook and L.M. Seiford, Strict vs. weak ordinal relations for multipliers in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science 37(1991)6.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2(1978)6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    T.M. Cover and C.W. Keilers, An offensive earned-run average for baseball, Operations Research 25(1977)5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S.J. Gould, Entropic homogeneity isn't why no one hits.400 any more, Discover 7(1986)8.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S.T. Hackman and L. Platzman, WEA, Computer program for calculating DEA, sponsored by the Material Handling Research Center, Atlanta, GA, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    L.H. Howard and J.L. Miller, Fair pay for fair play: Estimating pay equity in professional baseball with data envelopment analysis, Academy of Management Journal 36(1993)4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    G.R. Lindsey, An investigation of strategies in baseball, Operations Research 11(1963)4.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M.J. Mazur, Evaluating the relative efficiency of baseball players?, in: Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin and L.M. Seiford, eds., Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    L.M. Seiford and R.M. Thrall, Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis, Journal of Econometrics 46(1990).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Thorn and P. Palmer, Hidden Game of Baseball, Doubleday, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Thorn and P. Palmer, Total Baseball, 3rd ed., Harper-Collins, New York, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy R. Anderson
  • Gunter P. Sharp

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations