Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 42, Issue 7, pp 1370–1374 | Cite as

Acute Ulcer Bleeding (A Prospective Randomized Trial to Compare Doppler and Forrest Classifications in Endoscopic Diagnosis and Therapy)

  • Bernd Kohler
  • Matthias Maier
  • Claus Benz
  • Jurgen F. Riemann
Article

Abstract

The aim of our prospective randomized studyinvolving 100 patients was to investigate whetherDoppler ultrasound can be used to select patients atrisk for ulcer rebleeding. Ulcers in the Forrest group classified as having a visible vessel or a clotwere treated prophylactically by injection withepinephrine solution. In the Doppler group, in contrast,only ulcers with a positive Doppler signal were treated endoscopically. In the Doppler group, rebleedsoccurred significantly less frequently (2%, P < 0.03)than in the Forrest group (14%). Emergency surgery wasonly necessary in the Forrest group (0% vs 5%; P =0.02). Bleeding-related mortality was 0% and 4% (P =0.15) and the overall mortality 0% and 10% (P = 0.02),in the Doppler and Forrest groups, respectively. Theseresults appear to show that Doppler-based injection treatment is superior to endoscopictreatment based exclusively on the Forrestclassification. In our study, Doppler-based localendoscopic treatment reduced the danger of a rebleed andthus the number of emergency operations and the overallmortality.

ULCER BLEEDING VISIBLE VESSEL FORREST CLASSIFICATION ENDOSCOPIC DOPPLER ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Laine L, Peterson WL: Bleeding peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 331:717–727, 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forrest JAN, Finlayson NDC, Shearman DJC: Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet 2:394–397, 1974Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fullarton GM, Murray WR: Prediction of rebleeding in peptic ulcers by visual stigmata and endoscopic Doppler ultrasound criteria. Endoscopy 22:68–71, 1990Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Consensus Conference: Therapeutic endoscopy and bleeding ulcers. JAMA 262:1369–1372, 1989Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laine L, Freemann M, Cohen H: Lack of uniformity in evaluation of endoscopic prognostic features of bleeding ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 40:411–417, 1994Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kohler B, Riemann JF: The endoscopic doppler: Its value in evaluating gastroduodenal ulcers after hemorrhage and as an instrument of control of endoscopic injection therapy. Scand J Gastroenterol 26:471–476, 1991Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kohler B, Riemann JF: Endoscopic injection therapy of Forrest II and III gastroduodenal ulcers guided by endoscopic Doppler ultrasound. Endoscopy 25:219–223, 1993Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beckly DE, Casebow MP: Prediction of rebleeding from peptic ulcer experience with an endoscopic Doppler device. Gut 27:96–99, 1986Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beckly DE: Endoscopic Doppler in prediction of rebleeding risk in peptic ulcer. Endoscopy 20:26, 1988Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kohler B: Endoskopische Dopplersonographie: Technik, Indikation, Ergebnisse. Berlin, Springer, 1995Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O'Connor KW, Robinson M, Boyce G, Baerg R, Browning T, Satava R, Zuccaro G: The role of endoscopy in the management of non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 38:760–764, 1992Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffiths WJ, Neumann DA, Welsh JD: The visible vessel as an indicator of uncontrolled or recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 300:1411–1413, 1979Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Storey DW, Bown SG, Swain CP, Salmon SR, Kirkham JS, Northfield TC: Endoscopic prediction of recurrent bleeding in peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med 305:915–916, 1981Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swain CP, Bown SG, Storey DW, Kirkham JS, Northfield TC, Salmon PR: Controlled trial of argon laser photocoagulation in bleeding peptic ulcers. Lancet 2:1313–1316, 1981Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacLeod IA, Mills PR: Factors identifying the probability of further haemorrhage after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Br J Surg 69:256–268, 1982Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ell C, Hagenmüller F, Schmitt W, Riemann JF, Hahn EG, Hohenberger W: Multi-centre prospective study of the current state of treatment in Germany of bleeding peptic ulcer. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 120:3–9, 1995Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oxner RBG, Simmonds NJ, Gertner DJ, Nightingale JMD, Burnham WR: Controlled trial of endoscopic injection treatment for bleeding from peptic ulcers with visible vessels. Lancet 339:966–968, 1992Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rutgeerts P, Gevers AM, Hiele M, Broeckaert L, Vantrappen G: Endoscopic injection therapy to prevent rebleeding from peptic ulcers with a protruding vessel: a controlled comparative trial. Gut 34:348–350, 1993Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swain CP, Storey DW, Bown SG, Heath J, Mills TN, Salmon PR, Northfield TC, Kirkham JS, O'Sullivan JP: Nature of the bleeding vessel in recurrently bleeding gastric ulcers. Gastroenterology 90:595–608, 1986Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Kohler
  • Matthias Maier
  • Claus Benz
  • Jurgen F. Riemann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations