Sex Roles

, Volume 39, Issue 1–2, pp 21–43 | Cite as

Trends in Gender Differences in Academic Achievement from 1960 to 1994: An Analysis of Differences in Mean, Variance, and Extreme Scores

  • Amy Nowell
  • Larry V. Hedges

Abstract

Gender differences in academic achievement have been studied extensively. While it is generally agreed that females have a slight advantage on average in verbal abilities and males have a slight advantage on average in mathematics, it is unclear whether these differences have changed over time. In this paper evidence from seven surveys representative of the United States twelth grade student population and the National Assessment of Educational Progress(NAEP) long term trend data is brought to bear on the magnitude of gender differences in achievement, the level of agreement among different indices of difference, and the stability of these differences over time. These data provide the unique opportunity to not only empirically estimate mean differences, differences in variance, and differences in extreme scores, but also to estimate change over time in all three indices using both the same and different tests over time. Results show that gender differences in mean and variance are small, while differences in extreme scores are often substantial. None of these differences have changed significantly since 1960, with the possible exception of mean differences in mathematics and science. Each of the datasets reflects the racial composition of the national population when properly weighted (i.e. White = 70%, Black = 15%,Hispanic = 10%, Other = 5%).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Becker, B. J., & Hedges, L. V. (1984). Meta-analysis of cognitive gender differences: A comment on an analysis by Rosenthal and Rubin. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 583–587.Google Scholar
  2. Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical-reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232.Google Scholar
  3. Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 51–61.Google Scholar
  4. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262–1264.Google Scholar
  5. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical-reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1031.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1982). Differential aptitude tests manual (5th ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Blau, F. D., & Ferber, M. A. (1987a). Discrimination: Empirical evidence from the United States. American Economic Review, 77, 316–320.Google Scholar
  8. Blau, F. D., & Ferber, M. A. (1987b). The economics of men, women, and work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Bock, D. A., & Moore, E. (1986). Advantage and Disadvantage: A Profile of American Youth. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Cain, G. G. (1986). The economic analysis of labor market discrimination: A survey. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Pyschologist, 43, 95–103.Google Scholar
  13. Feingold, A. (1992a). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy, Review of Educational Research, 62, 61–84.Google Scholar
  14. Feingold, A. (1992b). The greater male variability controversy: Science versus politics, Review of Educational Research, 62, 89–90.Google Scholar
  15. Feingold, A. (1993). Cognitive gender differences: A developmental perspective, Sex Roles, 29, 91–112.Google Scholar
  16. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A cross-cultural perspective. Sex Roles, 30, 81–91.Google Scholar
  17. Feingold, A. (1995). The additive effects of differences in central tendency and variability are important in comparisons between groups. American Psychologist, 50, 5–13.Google Scholar
  18. Feingold, A. (1996). Cognitive gender differences: Where are they and why are they there? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 25–32.Google Scholar
  19. Flanagan, J. C., Dailey, J. T., Shaycroft, M. F., Gorham, W. A., Orr, D. B., & Goldberg, I. (1962). Design for a study of American youth. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, L. (1989). Mathematics and the gender gap: A meta-analysis of recent studies on sex differences in mathematical tasks. Review of Educational Research, 59, 185–213.Google Scholar
  21. Halpern, D. F. (1996). A process-oriented model of cognitive sex differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 3–24.Google Scholar
  22. Hedges, L. V. (1992). Meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 279–296.Google Scholar
  23. Hedges, L. V., & Becker, B. J. (1986). Statistical methods in the meta-analysis of research on gender differences. In J. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hedges, L. V., & Friedman, L. (1993a). Gender differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A reanalysis of Feingold's results, Review of Educational Research, 63, 94–105.Google Scholar
  25. Hedges, L. V., & Friedman, L. (1993b). Computing gender difference effects in tails of distributions: The consequences of differences in tail size, effect size, and variance ratio, Review of Educational Research, 63, 110–112.Google Scholar
  26. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.Google Scholar
  27. Humphreys, L. G. (1988). Sex differences in variability may be more important than sex differences in mean. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 195–196.Google Scholar
  28. Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using omega-squared and d. American Psychologist, 36, 892–901.Google Scholar
  29. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–153.Google Scholar
  30. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.Google Scholar
  31. Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1990). Male-female wage differentials in job ladders. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, S106–S123.Google Scholar
  32. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, H. (1989). Sex differences in the development of verbal and mathematics constructs: The High School and Beyond Study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 191–225.Google Scholar
  34. Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing?. Behavior Genetics, 23, 337–341.Google Scholar
  35. Moore, E. G. J., & Smith, A. W. (1987). Sex and ethnic group differences in mathematics achievement: Results from the National Longitudinal Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 25–36.Google Scholar
  36. Mullis, I., Dossey, J. A., Foertsch, M. A., Jones, L. R., & Gentile, M. A. (1991). Trends in academic progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Noddings, N. (1992). Variability: A pernicious hypothesis, Review of Educational Research, 62, 85–88.Google Scholar
  38. Paglin, M., & Rufolo, A. M. (1990). Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics, 8, 123–144.Google Scholar
  39. Rock, D. A., Hilton, T. L., Pollack, J., Ekstrom, R. B., & Goertz, M. E. (1985). Psychometric Analysis of the NLS and High School and Beyond Test Batteries. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  40. Rosen, S. (1981). The economics of superstars. The American Economic Review, 71, 845–858.Google Scholar
  41. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Further meta-analytic procedures for assessing cognitive gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 708–712.Google Scholar
  42. Shaycroft, M. F., Dailey, J. T., Orr, D. B., Neyman, C. A., & Sherman, S. E. (1963). Project Talent: The identification, development, and utilization of human talents: Studies of a complete age group — Age 15. Pittsburgh: PA: Project Talent Office, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  43. Stage, Frances K., & Maple, Sue A. (1996). Incompatible goals: Narratives of graduate women in the mathematics pipeline. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 23–51.Google Scholar
  44. Stumpf, H. (1995). Gender differences in performance on tests of cognitive abilities: Experimental design issues and empirical results. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 275–288.Google Scholar
  45. Stumpf, H., & Klieme, E. (1989). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 915–921.Google Scholar
  46. Stumpf, H., & Stanley, J.C. (1996). Gender-related differences on the College Board's Advanced Placement and Achievement Tests, 1982–1992. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 353–364.Google Scholar
  47. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.Google Scholar
  48. Wise, L. L., Steel, L., & MacDonald, C. (1979). Origins and career consequences of sex differences in high school mathematics achievement. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Nowell
  • Larry V. Hedges

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations