Sex Roles

, Volume 38, Issue 9–10, pp 781–800 | Cite as

Sexuality and Motherhood: Mutually Exclusive in Perception of Women

  • Ariella Friedman
  • Hana Weinberg
  • Ayala M. Pines

Abstract

The purpose of the present two studies was todemonstrate the existence of a split between motherhoodand sexuality in men's and women's perception of awoman, and to explore the effects gender, parental status and age have on it. In the first study,117 men and 121 women (ages 20-60) all Jewish, werepresented with one of three descriptions of a targetwoman varying her level of sexuality. They were told that she is married, has two children and worksoutside her home, and were asked to rate her on 4dimensions of mothering. In the second study, 45 men and45 women, all Jewish, were presented with one of the three descriptions of the target woman, butwithout the information about her marital/parentalstatus, and were asked to write a short story about her.The findings of the two studies demonstrate the existence of the split. Both quantitative andqualitative analyses concur in showing that sexualityand motherhood are mutually exclusive in the perceptionof women: The more sexual a woman is perceived to be, the less she is seen as a good mother.The split between sexuality and motherhood is somewhatstronger among men than among women and among parentsinvolved in active parenting than among olderparents.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abarbanell, N. (1994). Eve and Lilith. Ramat Gan Israel: Bar Ilan University. (Hebrew)Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. (1958). The nature of prejudice. Garden City, Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Basow, S. (1992). Gender stereotypes and roles. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  4. Buss, D. (1994). The evolution of desire. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch, H. (1945). The psychology of women: Motherhood (Vol. 3). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  8. Fee, E. (1976). Science and the woman problem: Historical perspectives. In M. Teitelbaum (Ed.), Sex differences. Garden City: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ferenseed, F. (1881). Sexual distinctions and resemblances. Quarterly Journal of Science, 3, 741. [Quoted in E. Fee (1976). Science and the woman problem: Historial perspectives. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.]Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1931). Collected papers. E. Jones (Ed.), London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ginsburg, L. (1975). Jewish legends. Tel Aviv: Masada. (Hebrew)Google Scholar
  12. Horney, K. (1967). Feminine psychology. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  13. Hyde, J. S. (1986). Understanding human sexuality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Kaats, G. R., & Davis, K. F. (1970). The dynamics of sexual behavior of college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 300-399.Google Scholar
  15. Lampert, A., & Friedman, A. (1992). Sex differences in vulnerability and maladjustment as a function of parental investment: An evolutionary approach. Social Biology, 39, 65-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lott, B. (1987). Women's lives Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  17. Peplau, L. A., Rubin, Z., & Hill, C. T. Sexual intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 86-109.Google Scholar
  18. Rich, A. (1978). Of woman born. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  19. Rubin, L. (1990). Erotic wars. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  20. Shoham, G. S. (1982). Love as decoy: Eve, Kazanova and Don Juan. Tel Aviv: Ramot. (Hebrew)Google Scholar
  21. Spencer, H. (1873). Psychology of the sexes. Popular Science Monthly, 4, 31-32. [Quoted in Fee, E. (1976). Science and teh woman problem: Historical perspectives. In M. Teiklbaum (Ed.), Sex differences. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.]Google Scholar
  22. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wade, C., & Cirese, S. (1991). Human Sexuality. New York: Hacourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ariella Friedman
  • Hana Weinberg
  • Ayala M. Pines

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations