Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex Differences in Loneliness: The Role of Masculinity and Femininity

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study assessed the magnitude of sexdifferences in loneliness after accounting for theinfluence of two covariates: masculinity and femininity.The 256 participants (principally White, somewhat affluent, and middle-class university students)completed both the UCLA Loneliness Scale and the Bem SexRole Inventory. Whereas sex differences were originallynonsignificant (males tended to be lonelier than females), this difference was significantafter accounting for masculinity (not femininity)embedded in participants' loneliness scores. Similarresults emerged when the covariates were partialled out of both loneliness (criterion) and sex(predictor). These findings support the hypothesis thatmales appear reluctant to admit feelings of loneliness.Male reluctance to personally admit social deficits such as loneliness is suggested for futureresearch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allen, R. L., & Oshagan, H. (1995). The UCLA Loneliness Scale: Invariance of social structural characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 185-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. M., & Bem, S. L. (1981). Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 74-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, F. S., Bartholomew, K., & Marx, R. (1995). Loneliness in early adolescence: A test of the cognitive discrepancy model of loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 296-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubé, J., & Koestner, R. (1992). Gender characteristics and adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 485-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubé, J., Norcliffe, H., Craig, J., & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and adjustment-related outcomes: Questioning the masculinity model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 284-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, A. W. (1982). Escaping loneliness in adolescence: The case for androgyny. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 451-459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgardner, A. H., Heppner, R. P., & Arkin, R. M. (1986). Role of causal attribution in personal problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 636-643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Young, J. E. (1978). College blues. Psychology Today, 99, 80-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). Lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J. H., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Loneliness: The relationships of self-disclosure and androgyny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 624-630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, R. (1983). An examination of college GPA, composite ACT scores, IQs and gender in relation to loneliness of college students. Psychological Reports, 53, 347-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borys, S., & Perlman, D. (1985). Gender differences in loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 63-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brage, D., Meredith, W., & Woodward, J. (1993). Correlates of loneliness among Midwestern adolescents. Adolescence, 28, 685-693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS for Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. L. (1986). Adolescent loneliness, self-disclosure, and private self-consciousness: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 595-608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. L., & Padesky, C. A. (1977). Sex differences in the expression of depressive responses on the Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 609-614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. L., & Peters, S. D. (1977). Differential responses to male and female depressive reactions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 994-1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, T. S. (1993). Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 182-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. G., Chisholm, B. J., Marsh, N. V., & Godfrey, H. P. D. (1988). Some normative, reliability, and factor analytic data for the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 203-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, L. J., Isaacs, A. M., & Schwartz, J. A. J. (1994). Sex differences in adolescent depression and loneliness: Why are boys lonelier if girls are more depressed? Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 27-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S. (1989). Sex role orientation and domains of self-esteem. Sex Roles, 21, 415-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S., & Gruen, G. E. (1992). The social stigma of loneliness: Effect of target person's and perceiver's sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 182-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markstrom-Adams, C. (1989). Androgyny and its relation to adolescent psychosocial well-being: A review of the literature. Sex Roles, 21, 325-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. M. (1990). High school size as a factor in adolescent loneliness. High School Journal, 73, 150-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valence and attribution certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 307-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N., & Sermat, V. (1983). Measuring loneliness in different relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1038-1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, N. R., Jr., & Moore, D. (1986). The loneliness experience of college students: Sex differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 111-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 511-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1991). Behavioral other-enhancement: Strategically obscuring the link between performance and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 79-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solano, C. H., Batten, P. G., & Parish, E. A. (1982). Loneliness and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 524-531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, J., & Levin, I. (1986). Gender differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1069-1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornstam, L. (1992). Loneliness in marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 197-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L., Reis, H. T., & Nezlek, J. (1983). Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 943-953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1983). Sex-role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 773-786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1988). Masculinity, femininity, and self-esteem: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 419-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg, M. T., & Reis, H. T. (1986). Loneliness, social skills, and social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 121-130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kenneth M. Cramer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kimberley A. Neyedley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cramer, K.M., Neyedley, K.A. Sex Differences in Loneliness: The Role of Masculinity and Femininity. Sex Roles 38, 645–653 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018850711372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018850711372

Keywords

Search

Navigation