Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 38, Issue 7–8, pp 645–653 | Cite as

Sex Differences in Loneliness: The Role of Masculinity and Femininity

  • Kenneth M. Cramer
  • Kimberley A. Neyedley
Article

Abstract

The present study assessed the magnitude of sexdifferences in loneliness after accounting for theinfluence of two covariates: masculinity and femininity.The 256 participants (principally White, somewhat affluent, and middle-class university students)completed both the UCLA Loneliness Scale and the Bem SexRole Inventory. Whereas sex differences were originallynonsignificant (males tended to be lonelier than females), this difference was significantafter accounting for masculinity (not femininity)embedded in participants' loneliness scores. Similarresults emerged when the covariates were partialled out of both loneliness (criterion) and sex(predictor). These findings support the hypothesis thatmales appear reluctant to admit feelings of loneliness.Male reluctance to personally admit social deficits such as loneliness is suggested for futureresearch.

Keywords

Social Psychology Social Deficit Loneliness Scale UCLA Loneliness Scale Loneliness Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allen, R. L., & Oshagan, H. (1995). The UCLA Loneliness Scale: Invariance of social structural characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 185-195.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. M., & Bem, S. L. (1981). Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 74-86.Google Scholar
  3. Archibald, F. S., Bartholomew, K., & Marx, R. (1995). Loneliness in early adolescence: A test of the cognitive discrepancy model of loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 296-301.Google Scholar
  4. Aubé, J., & Koestner, R. (1992). Gender characteristics and adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 485-493.Google Scholar
  5. Aubé, J., Norcliffe, H., Craig, J., & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and adjustment-related outcomes: Questioning the masculinity model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 284-295.Google Scholar
  6. Avery, A. W. (1982). Escaping loneliness in adolescence: The case for androgyny. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 451-459.Google Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-21.Google Scholar
  8. Baumgardner, A. H., Heppner, R. P., & Arkin, R. M. (1986). Role of causal attribution in personal problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 636-643.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, A. T., & Young, J. E. (1978). College blues. Psychology Today, 99, 80-92.Google Scholar
  10. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.Google Scholar
  11. Bem, S. L. (1993). Lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berg, J. H., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Loneliness: The relationships of self-disclosure and androgyny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 624-630.Google Scholar
  13. Booth, R. (1983). An examination of college GPA, composite ACT scores, IQs and gender in relation to loneliness of college students. Psychological Reports, 53, 347-352.Google Scholar
  14. Borys, S., & Perlman, D. (1985). Gender differences in loneliness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 63-74.Google Scholar
  15. Brage, D., Meredith, W., & Woodward, J. (1993). Correlates of loneliness among Midwestern adolescents. Adolescence, 28, 685-693.Google Scholar
  16. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS for Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. L. (1986). Adolescent loneliness, self-disclosure, and private self-consciousness: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 595-608.Google Scholar
  19. Hammen, C. L., & Padesky, C. A. (1977). Sex differences in the expression of depressive responses on the Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 609-614.Google Scholar
  20. Hammen, C. L., & Peters, S. D. (1977). Differential responses to male and female depressive reactions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 994-1001.Google Scholar
  21. Hartshorne, T. S. (1993). Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 182-195.Google Scholar
  22. Knight, R. G., Chisholm, B. J., Marsh, N. V., & Godfrey, H. P. D. (1988). Some normative, reliability, and factor analytic data for the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 203-206.Google Scholar
  23. Koenig, L. J., Isaacs, A. M., & Schwartz, J. A. J. (1994). Sex differences in adolescent depression and loneliness: Why are boys lonelier if girls are more depressed? Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 27-43.Google Scholar
  24. Lau, S. (1989). Sex role orientation and domains of self-esteem. Sex Roles, 21, 415-422.Google Scholar
  25. Lau, S., & Gruen, G. E. (1992). The social stigma of loneliness: Effect of target person's and perceiver's sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 182-189.Google Scholar
  26. Markstrom-Adams, C. (1989). Androgyny and its relation to adolescent psychosocial well-being: A review of the literature. Sex Roles, 21, 325-340.Google Scholar
  27. Page, R. M. (1990). High school size as a factor in adolescent loneliness. High School Journal, 73, 150-153.Google Scholar
  28. Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valence and attribution certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 307-322.Google Scholar
  29. Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40.Google Scholar
  30. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.Google Scholar
  31. Schmidt, N., & Sermat, V. (1983). Measuring loneliness in different relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1038-1047.Google Scholar
  32. Schultz, N. R., Jr., & Moore, D. (1986). The loneliness experience of college students: Sex differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 111-119.Google Scholar
  33. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 511-530.Google Scholar
  34. Sheppard, J. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1991). Behavioral other-enhancement: Strategically obscuring the link between performance and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 79-88.Google Scholar
  35. Solano, C. H., Batten, P. G., & Parish, E. A. (1982). Loneliness and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 524-531.Google Scholar
  36. Stokes, J., & Levin, I. (1986). Gender differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1069-1074.Google Scholar
  37. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347-366.Google Scholar
  39. Tornstam, L. (1992). Loneliness in marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 197-217.Google Scholar
  40. Wheeler, L., Reis, H. T., & Nezlek, J. (1983). Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 943-953.Google Scholar
  41. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1983). Sex-role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 773-786.Google Scholar
  42. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1988). Masculinity, femininity, and self-esteem: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 419-431.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Wittenberg, M. T., & Reis, H. T. (1986). Loneliness, social skills, and social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 121-130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth M. Cramer
  • Kimberley A. Neyedley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations