Sex Roles

, Volume 41, Issue 5–6, pp 459–467 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Memory Perspectives: Evidence for Self-Objectification in Women

  • David M. Huebner
  • Barbara L. Fredrickson
Article

Abstract

This study tests Fredrickson and Roberts' (1997)assertion that cultural practices of sexuallyobjectifying women's bodies socialize women tointernalize an observer's perspective on their physicalselves. Autobiographical memories can contain imagesfrom two perspectives: the original, first personperspective (field images) and that of an outsideobserver (observer images) (Nigro and Neisser, 1983). We collected autobiographical memories for eventsin general and for specific, potentially objectifyingsituations from a predominantly European-American sampleof 138 female and 104 male students at a private university. Results demonstrated that femaleparticipants reported more observer imagery than maleparticipants both for memories in general and formemories of certain situations wherein women are likely to be sexually objectified. Women's and men'semotional responses to these situations were alsodifferent, with women reporting more negative affect,including shame and anxiety, and less positiveaffect.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barron, R. M.,& Kenny, D. A. (1986).The mode rator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
  2. Beauvoir, S. (1952). The second sex(H. M. Parshle y, trans.). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seein g. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Berscheid,E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster,G.W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173–189.Google Scholar
  5. Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. (1977). Sexism and ``beautyism' ' in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301–310.Google Scholar
  6. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empath and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.Google Scholar
  7. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., & Shea, C. (1989). Gender differences in empathy and prosocial moral reasoning: Empirical investigations. In M. M. Brabeck (Ed.). Who cares? Theory, research, and educational implications of the ethic of care. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  8. Frank, M. G., & Gilovich, T. (1989). Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 399–403.Google Scholar
  9. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Towards an understanding of women' s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.Google Scholar
  10. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998).That swimsuit become s you: Sex difference s in self-objectification, restrained eating and math performance. Journal of Personality an d Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.Google Scholar
  11. Gardner, C. B. (1980). Passing by: Street remarks, address rights, and the urban female. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 328–356.Google Scholar
  12. Garfinkel, P. E., & Garner, D. M. (1982). Anorexianervosa: A multidimensional perspective. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  13. Heiman, J. R., & Verhulst, J. (1982). Gender and sexual functioning. In I. Al-Issa (Ed.), Genderand psychopathology (pp. 305–320). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women's experience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, M. (1992). Shame: The exposed self. New York: Free Pre ss.Google Scholar
  16. Lorenz, C., & Neisser, U. (1985). Factors of imagery and event recall. Memory and Cognition, 13 494–500.Google Scholar
  17. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.Google Scholar
  18. Nigro, G., & Neisser, U. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 693–702.Google Scholar
  19. Nolen-Hoeksema S. (1990). Sex differences in depression. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational mode l linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.Google Scholar
  21. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Huebner
  • Barbara L. Fredrickson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations