Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 1023–1030 | Cite as

Efficiency and Efficacy of the Electrogastrogram

  • D. Levanon
  • M. Zhang
  • J. D. Z. Chen
Article

Abstract

The efficiency and efficacy of theelectrogastrogram (EGG) involve a few practical factors,including recording length, sample size, and thecharacteristics of subjects. The aim of this study wasto investigate the effect of these factors on the accuracy ofEGG analysis. Gastric myoelectrical activity wasrecorded using electrogastrography in 24 subjects (ages22-91 years) for 1 hr in the fasting state and 2 hr after a test meal. Computerized spectralanalysis was performed to compute EGG parameters,including dominant frequency, dominant power, and thepercentage of 2-4 cycles per minute (cpm) slow waves. A parameter called misinterpretation was definedto investigate the effect of recording length. Theresults were as follows: (1) Using the recording lengthof 1 hr in each state as a gold standard, themisinterpretation for the recording length of 30 min was 27% forthe dominant frequency and 17% for the dominant power.When the recording length was reduced to 15 min, themisinterpretation increased to 61% for the dominant frequency and 38% for the dominant power. (2)With a sample size of 10 subjects and a recording lengthof 60 min, a statistically significant postprandialincrease was observed in the dominant frequency and power, and a trend in the postprandialincrease of the regularity of the EGG was noted. Whenthe sample size increased to 24 subjects, a significantpostprandial increase was found in all these parameters. (3) None of the EGG parameters exhibited anysignificant difference between the younger and oldersubjects or between men and women. In conclusion, arecording length of 30-60 min seems to be appropriate and produces reliable and predictable results.Age and gender do not affect any of the EGGparameters.

ELECTROGASTROGRAPHY GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY GASTRIC EMPTYING STOMACH 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Chen JDZ, McCallum RW: Characteristics of the gastric slow wave in different phase s of the gastric motility cycles. Gastroente rology 100:A428, 1991Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hasle r WL: The physiology of gastric motility and gastric emptying. InTextbook of Gastroente rology, Vol. 1. T Yamada (ed). New York, JB Lippincott, 1993, pp 181-206Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen JDZ, McCallum RW: Clinical applications of ele ctrogastrography. Am J Gastroenterol 1(9):1324-1336, 1993Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Riezzo G, Pe zzolla F, Thouvenot J, Giorgio I: Reproducibility of cutaneous ele ctrogastrography in the fasting state in man. Pathol Biol 40(9):889-894, 1992Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pfaffenbach B, Wedmann B, Adamek RJ, We gener M: The significance of e lectrogastrographically determined amplitude— is there a correlation to sonographically measured antral mechanical contraction? Z Gastroentrol 33(2):103-107, 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen J, Richards RD, McCallum RW: Identi(r) cation of gastric contractions from the cutaneous ele ctrogastrogram. Am J Gastroenterol 89:79-85, 1994Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abe ll TL, Malage lada J-R: Glucagon-e voked gastric dysrhythmias in humans shown by an improved e lectrogastrographic technique. Gastroente rology 88:1932-1940, 1985Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gross D, Grassino A, Ross WRD, Macklem PT: Electromyogram pattern of diaphragmatic fatigue. J Appl Physiol: Re spir Environ Exercise Physiol 46:1-7, 1979Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamada M, Hongo M, Okuno Y, Nishimura N, Ueno M, Kawakami H, Toyota T: Effect of AS-4370 on gastric motility in patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy. J Smooth Muscle Re s 28( 4):153-158, 1992Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pfaffenbach B, Adame k RJ, Kuhn K, Wege ner M: Electrogastrography in healthy subjects. Evaluation of normal value s, in¯ uence of age and gender. Dig Dis Sci 40(7):1445-1450, 1995Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parkman HP, Harris AD, Miller MA, Fisher RS: In¯ uence of age, gender, and menstrual cycle on the normal electrogastrogram. Am J Gastroente rol 91(1):127-133, 1996Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nishimura N, Hongo M, Yamada M, Kawakami H, Toyota T: Gastric myoe lectrical activities in e lderly human subjectsÐ surface ele ctrogastrographic observations. J Smooth Muscle Re s 31( 2):43-49, 1995Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levanon D, Zhang M, Orr WC, Chen JDZ: Effects of meal volume and composition on gastric myoe lectrical activity. Am J Physiol. 274:G430-G434, 1998Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smout AJPM, van der Schee EJ, Grashuis JL: What is measured in ele ctrogastrography? Dig Dis Sci 25:179-187, 1980Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abe ll TL, Malage lada J-R, Lucas AR, Brown Ml, Camilleri M, Go VL, Azpiroz F, Callaway CW, Kao PC, Zinsmeister AR: Gastric ele ctrome chanical and neurohormonal function in anorexia nervosa. Gastroente rology 93:958-965, 1987Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen JDZ, McCallum RW: Electrogastrographic parame ters and their clinical signi(r) cance. InElectrogastrography: Principles and Applications. JDZ Chen, RW McCallum (eds). New York, Rave n Press, 1994, pp 45-73Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Familoni BO, Bowes KL, Kingma YJ, Cote KR: Can transcutaneous recordings dete ct gastric electrical abnormalities? Gut 32:141-146, 1991Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liang J, Cheung JY, Chen JDZ: De tection and e limination of motion artifacts in e lectrogastrogram using feature analysis and neural networks. Ann Biomed Eng 25:850-857, 1997Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Riezzo G, Pe zzolla F, Giorgio I: Effects of age and obesity on fasting gastric e lectrical activity in man: A cutaneous e lectrogastrographic study. Digestion 50(3-4):176-181, 1991Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walsh JW, Hasle r WL, Nugent CE, Owyang C: Proge ste rone and e strogen are potential mediators of gastric slow-wave dys rhythmias in nause a of pre gnancy. Am J Phys iol 270( 3):G506-G514, 1996Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giorgio I, Abbattista N, Lemaire MC, Pezzola F, Thouvenot J: The spectral component of e lectrogastrography (EGG): factors of variation in normal subjects, and in patients with cance r and ulcers. Pathol Biol 37( 6):712-719, 1989Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hongo M, Okuno Y, Nishimura N, Toyota T, Okuyama S: Electrogastrography for prediction of gastric emptying state. InElectrogastrography: Principles and Applications. JDZ Chen, RW McCallum (eds). New York, Rave n Press, 1994, pp 257- 269Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dubois A, Bruley des Varannes S, Mizrahi M, Fiala N, Solomon T, Turkelson C: Role of cholecystokinin in the regulation of gastric function after caloric me als. Gastroente rology 100:A439, 1992Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takayasu H, Harasawa S, Miwa T, Yamada Y: Investigation of gastric function and prevalence of Helicobacter pyloriin nonulcer dyspepsia. Jpn J Gastroenterol 90( 4):743-754, 1993Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stern RM, Koch LK: Using the e lectrogastrogram to study motion sickness. InElectrogastrography: Principles and Applications. JDZ Chen, RW McCallum, eds. New York, Raven Press, 1994, p 206Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen J, Lin ZY, McCallum RW: Abnormal gastric myoele ctrical activity and delaye d gastric emptying in patients with symptoms sugge stive of gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci 41( 8):1538- 1545, 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Levanon
  • M. Zhang
  • J. D. Z. Chen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations