Sex Roles

, Volume 40, Issue 1–2, pp 73–92 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Pointing Accuracy in Computer-Simulated 3D Mazes

  • Carol A. Lawton
  • Kevin A. Morrin


Gender differences in pointing accuracy incomputer-simulated mazes were studied as a function ofmaze complexity and training effects. College students(primarily White) were led through mazes with different numbers of turns; at the end of each maze, theywere asked to indicate the direction of the maze origin(starting point). Pointing accuracy declined with numberof turns, but men were consistently more accurate than women by about 20°,regardless of maze complexity. Training participants totrack the relative position of the maze origin whilemoving through the maze produced equivalent benefits inpointing accuracy for both women and men. Thus, althoughpointing accuracy of men remained higher than that ofwomen, the results suggest that pointing performance canbe modified by experience.


Gender Difference College Student Social Psychology Relative Position Training Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baenninger, M. (1997). Sex-related differences in the development of spatialability: The efficacy of training. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20,327-344.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, M. A., Vitaglione, G. D., Harper, K. K. G., Quackenbush, S. W., Steadman, L. A., & Valdez, B. S. (1997). Late adole scents' expe riences with and attitude s toward videogames. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1316-1334.Google Scholar
  4. Bryant, K. J. (1982). Personality corre lates of sense of direction and geographical orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1318-1324.Google Scholar
  5. Busch, T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 147-158.Google Scholar
  6. Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241-260.Google Scholar
  7. Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: Family handedne ss and college major as a factor identifying women who excel. Neuropsychologia, 27, 689-696.Google Scholar
  8. Curtis, L. E., Siegel, A. W., & Furlong, N. E. (1981). Developmental differences in cognitive mapping: Configurational knowledge of familiar large-scale environments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 456-469.Google Scholar
  9. De Lisi, R., & Cammarano, D. M. (1996). Computer experience and gender difference s in undergraduate mental rotation performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 351-361.Google Scholar
  10. Devlin, A. S., & Bernstein, J. (1995). Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 23-38.Google Scholar
  11. Dorval, M., & Pépin, M. (1986). Effect of playing a video game on a me asure of spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 159-162.Google Scholar
  12. Galea, L. A. M., & Kimura, D. (1993). Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 53-65.Google Scholar
  13. Golledge, R. G., Ruggles, A. J., Pellegrino, J. W., & Gale, N. D. (1993). Integrating route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood: Along and across route experiments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 293-307.Google Scholar
  14. Greenfield, P. M. (1994). Video games as cultural artifacts. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 3-12.Google Scholar
  15. Greenfield, P. M., Brannon, C., & Lohr, D. (1994). Two-dimensional representation of movement through three-dimensional space: The role of video game expertise. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 87-103.Google Scholar
  16. Greenfield, P. M., Camaioni, L., Ercolani, P., Weiss, L., Lauber, B. A., & Perrucchini, P. (1994). Cognitive socialization by computer games in two cultures: Inductive discovery or mastery of an iconic code? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 59-85.Google Scholar
  17. Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Hart, R. (1978). Children's experience of place. New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
  19. Holding, C. S., & Holding, D. H. (1989). Acquisition of route network knowledge by males and females. The Journal of General Psychology, 116, 29-41.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt, E. B., Pellegrino, J. W., Frick, R. W., Farr, S. A., & Alderton, D. L. (1988). The ability to reason about movement in the visual field. Intelligence, 12,77-100.Google Scholar
  21. id Software. (1994). Doom II. New York: GT Interactive Software.Google Scholar
  22. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. C., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293-298.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhlman, J. S., & Beitel, P. A. (1989). Age/sex/expe rience: Possible explanations of differences in anticipation of coincidence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1283-1289.Google Scholar
  24. Law, D. J., Pellegrino, J. W., & Hunt, E. B. (1993). Comparing the tortoise and the hare: Gender difference s and experience in dynamic spatial reasoning tasks. Psychological Science, 4, 35-40.Google Scholar
  25. Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765-779.Google Scholar
  26. Lawton, C. A. (1996). Strategies for indoor wayfinding: The role of orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 137-145.Google Scholar
  27. Lawton, C. A., Charleston, S. I., & Zieles, A. S. (1996). Individual-and gender-related differences in indoor wayfinding. Environment and Behavior, 28, 204-219.Google Scholar
  28. Leukart, H. (1995). The Doom hacker's guide. New York: MIS: Press.Google Scholar
  29. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex difference s in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.Google Scholar
  30. Matthews, M. H. (1986a). Gender, graphicacy and geography. Educational Review, 38, 259-271.Google Scholar
  31. Matthews, M. H. (1986b). The influence of gender on the environmental cognition of young boys and girls. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147, 295-302.Google Scholar
  32. McClurg, P. A., & Chaillé, C. (1987). Compute r games: Environments for developing spatial cognition? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 95-111.Google Scholar
  33. McGuinness, D., & Sparks, J. Cognitive style and cognitive maps: Sex differences in representations of a familiar terrain. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7, 91-100.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, L. K., & Santoni, V. (1986). Sex differences in spatial abilities: Strategic and expe riential correlates. Acta Psychologica, 62, 225-235.Google Scholar
  35. Montello, D. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment and Behavior, 23, 47-69.Google Scholar
  36. Montello, D. R., & Pick, H. L. (1993). Integrating knowledge of vertically aligned large-scale spaces. Environment and Behavior, 25, 457-484.Google Scholar
  37. Morrin, K. A. (1990). Individual differences in re al-time information coordination: Relating dynamic spatial and verbal information. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 2, 944-948.Google Scholar
  38. Newcombe, N., Bandura, M. M., & Taylor, D. G. (1983). Sex difference s in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9, 377-386.Google Scholar
  39. Okagaki, L., & French, P. A. (1994). Effects of video game playing on measures of spatial performance: Gender effects in late adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 33-58.Google Scholar
  40. Péruch, P., & Lapin, E. A. (1993). Route knowledge in different spatial frames of reference. Acta Psychologica, 84, 253-269.Google Scholar
  41. Phillips, C. A., Rolls, S., Rouse, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Home video game playing in schoolchildren: A study of incidence and patterns of play. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 687-691.Google Scholar
  42. Presson, C. C., DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 887-897.Google Scholar
  43. Regian, J. W., & Yadrick, R. M. (1994). Assessment of configurational knowledge of naturallyand artificially-acquired large-scale space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 211-223.Google Scholar
  44. Roberts, R. J., & Aman, C. J. (1993). Developmental differences in giving directions: Spatial frames of reference and mental rotation. Child Development, 64, 1258-1270.Google Scholar
  45. Sadalla, E. K., & Magel, S. G. (1980). The perception of traversed distance. Environment and Behavior, 12, 65-79.Google Scholar
  46. Sadalla, E. K., & Montello, D. R. (1989). Remembering changes in direction. Environment and Behavior, 21, 346-363.Google Scholar
  47. Sholl, M. J. (1989). The relation between horizontality and rod-and-frame and vestibular navigational performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 110-125.Google Scholar
  48. Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. M. (1994). Effect of video game practice on spatial skills in girls and boys. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 13-32.Google Scholar
  49. Tkacz, S. LaForce, P., Quigley, K. (1997). The effect of practice and gender on surrogate navigation performance. Paper presented at the me eting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  50. Vasta, R., Knott, J. A., & Gaze, C. E. (1996). Can spatial training erase the gender differences on the water-leve l task? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 549-567.Google Scholar
  51. Ward, S. L., Newcombe, N., & Overton, W. F. (1986). Turn left at the church, or three miles north. Environment and Behavior, 18, 192-213.Google Scholar
  52. Webley, P. (1981). Sex difference s in home range and cognitive maps in eight-year-old children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 293-302.Google Scholar
  53. Webley, P. & Whalley, A. (1987). Sex differences in children's environmental cognition. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 223-225.Google Scholar
  54. Weisman, G. S., O'Neill, M. J., & Doll, C. A. (1987). Compute r graphic simulation of way finding in a public environment: A validation study. In J. Harvey & D. Henning (Eds.), Public environments: Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association. Washington, DC: EDRA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol A. Lawton
  • Kevin A. Morrin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations