Sex Roles

, Volume 38, Issue 3–4, pp 269–285 | Cite as

“I'll Take Gender Differences for $1000!” Domain-Specific Intellectual Success on “Jeopardy”

  • Sheila Brownlow
  • Rebecca Whitener
  • Janet M. Rupert


A great deal of laboratory research has demonstrated that women underestimate their intellect and abilities, and we studied whether this tendency manifested itself outside the laboratory by examining the performance of men and women on the television game show “Jeopardy”. Information about the masculinity and femininity of the topic categories for 65 games was collected, and selections, answers,wagering strategies, and earnings were noted for 195 White men and women contestants on the show. Men were more likely than women to appear as contestants, made most of the selections in the game, and won more money. Until the end of the game, men selected and correctly answered a disproportional number of questions from masculine topic categories, which appeared more often during the first round of play. Women chose more feminine and neutral questions than did men, and correctly answered those questions at a proportional rate. Wagering strategies differed late in the game, as men bet a higher percent of their earnings than did women, but only when wagering on masculine topics. Several explanations for differing performance of men and women on “Jeopardy”are offered, including confidence in ability due to self-estimation of intelligence, differential use of evaluative feedback, and the gender role appropriateness of demonstrating intellect.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkin, D. (1991). The evolution of the television series addressing single women, 1966–1990. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 517-523.Google Scholar
  2. Beloff, H. (1992). Mother, father, and me: Our IQ. The Psychologist, 5, 309-311.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, D. S. (1990). Vocal attractiveness: Effects on stranger, self, and friend impressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 141-153.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, D. S. (1991). Accuracy in social perception: Contributions of facial and vocal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 298-307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, D. S., & Brownlow, S. (1989). Were the physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 266-279.Google Scholar
  6. Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960-970.Google Scholar
  7. Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 157-172.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, C. F., Berry, D. S., & Omar, A. (1994). The kernel of truth in judgments of deceptiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 523-534.Google Scholar
  9. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553.Google Scholar
  10. Brownlow, S., & Durham, S. (1997). Sex differences in the use of science and technology in children's cartoons. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6, 103-110.Google Scholar
  11. Brownlow, S., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (1990). Facial appearance, gender, and credibility in television commercials. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 51-60.Google Scholar
  12. Byrd, M., & Stacey, B. (1993). Bias in IQ perception. The Psychologist, 6, 16.Google Scholar
  13. Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941-951.Google Scholar
  14. Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Marecek, J., & Pascale, L. (1975). When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 520-530.Google Scholar
  15. Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80-85.Google Scholar
  16. Fitch, M., Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1993). From television forms to genre schemata: Children's perceptions of reality television. In G. L. Berry & J. K. Asamen (Eds.), Children and television: Images in a changing sociocultural world. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Fitzgerald, J. M., & Mellor, J. M. (1988). How do people think about intelligence? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 143-157.Google Scholar
  18. Flugel, J. C. (1947). An inquiry as to popular views on intelligence and related topics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 140-152.Google Scholar
  19. Foshi, M., Lai, L., & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 326-339.Google Scholar
  20. Furnham, A., & Rawles, R. (1995). Sex differences in the estimation of intelligence. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 741-748.Google Scholar
  21. Hogan, H. W. (1973). IQ: Self estimates of males and females. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 137-138.Google Scholar
  22. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69.Google Scholar
  23. Lippa, R., & Beauvais, C. (1983). Gender jeopardy: The effects of gender, assessed femininity and masculinity, and false success/failure feedback on performance in an experimental quiz game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 344-353.Google Scholar
  24. Lips, H. M. (1992). Gender and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students' academic choices. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 62-81.Google Scholar
  25. Noble, C. E., Baker, B. L., & Jones, T. A. (1972). Age and sex parameters in psychomotor learning. In R. N. Singer (Ed.), Readings in motor learning. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  26. Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 37-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Reilly, J., & Mulhern, G. (1995). Gender differences in self-estimated IQ: The need for care in interpreting group data. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 189-192.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influences of evaluation on self-assessment in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297-308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shipstone, K., & Burt, S. (1973). Twenty-five years on: A replication of Flugel's (1947) work on lay popular views of intelligence and related topics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 183-187.Google Scholar
  30. Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656-666.Google Scholar
  31. Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People's conception of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37-55.Google Scholar
  32. Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21-36.Google Scholar
  33. Swim, J. K., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409-429.Google Scholar
  34. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallston, B., & O'Leary, V. (1981). Sex makes a difference: Differential perceptions of women and men. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and Gender, 2. (pp. 21-36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Ziegler, D., & White, A. (1990). Women and minorities on network television news: An examination of correspondents and newsmakers. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 215-223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheila Brownlow
  • Rebecca Whitener
  • Janet M. Rupert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations