Sex Roles

, Volume 38, Issue 1–2, pp 1–28 | Cite as

Gender Discrimination and the Workplace: An Examination of Rational Bias Theory

  • Susan Trentham
  • Laurie Larwood
Article

Abstract

Previous research concerning the “rationalbias” theory of workplace discrimination has beenconfined largely to narrow student samples. This studyextends that work with an experimental-survey design in which employed participants were asked bothhow others respond to conditions classically elicitingrational bias discrimination, and how they believepeople behave in their own firms. Participants were 148 men and 158 women (88.6% Caucasian, 4.6%Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 2.8% other racialidentification) with graduate business degrees from apublic university. Results show evidence of continuingdiscrimination, and support the theory predicting rational biasgender discrimination in the workplace. Gender ofrespondent and locus of control (defined by Spector'sWork Locus of Control scale) are also shown to be related to rational bias discrimination.Suggestions are made for further development and testingof rational bias theory.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888–918.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, M. A. (1988). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, J. N., Mittman, B. S., & Newman, A. E. (1991). Targets of opportunity: Organizational and environmental determinants of gender integration within the California civil service, 1979–1985. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1362–1401.Google Scholar
  4. Benokraitis, N. V., and Feagin, J. R. (1995). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, G. (1993). Testing the relationship of locus of control to different performance dimensions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 125–138.Google Scholar
  6. Blum, T. C., Fields, D. L., & Goodman, J. S. (1994). Organization-level determinants of women in management. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 241–268.Google Scholar
  7. Brannon, L. (1996). Gender: Psychological perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Crosby, F., Clayton, S., Alksnis, O., & Hemker, K. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: The importance of format. Sex Roles, 14, 637–648.Google Scholar
  9. Crosby, F. J., Putfall, A., Snyder, R. C., O'Connell, M., & Whalen, P. (1989). The denial of personal disadvantage among you, me, and all the other ostriches. In M. Crawford and M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Datan, N. (1989). Illness and imagery: Feminist cognition, socialization, and gender identity. In M. Crawford and M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Dexter, C. R. (1985). Women and the exercise of power in organizations: From ascribed to achieved status. In L. Larwood, B. A. Gutek, & A. H. Stromberg (Eds.), Women and work: Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women's social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589–634.Google Scholar
  13. England, P., & McCreary, L. (1987). Integrating sociology and economics to study gender and work. In A. H. Stromberg, L. Larwood, & B. A. Gutek (Eds.), Women and work: Vol. 2. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Fagenson, E. A. (1990). At the heart of women in management. In K. S. Kaziora, M. H. Moskow, & L. D. Tanner (Eds.), Working women: Past, present, future. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  15. Fagenson, E. A. (1993). Diversity in management: Introduction and the importance of women in management. In L. Larwood, B. A. Gutek, & A. H. Stromberg (Series Eds.) & E. A. Fagenson (Vol. Ed.), Women and work: Vol. 4. Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  17. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1981). Acceptance, yielding, and impact: Cognitive processes in persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Block (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, J. (1989). Women: A feminist perspective (4th ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  19. Gealy, J., Larwood, L., and Elliot, M. P. (1979). Where sex counts: Effects of consultant and client gender in management consulting. Group and Organization Studies, 4, 201–211.Google Scholar
  20. Gerhart, B. (1990). Gender differences in current and starting salaries: The role of performance, college major, and job title. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43, 418–433.Google Scholar
  21. Groves, M. (1996). Women still bumping up against the glass ceiling. Los Angeles Times, May 26, D1, D5.Google Scholar
  22. Ilgen, D. R. (1986). Laboratory research: A question of when, not if. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field setting. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  23. Jacobs, J. A. (1992). Women's entry into management: Trends in earnings, authority and values among salaried managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 282–301.Google Scholar
  24. Katz, D. (1987). Sex discrimination in hiring: The influence of organizational climate and need for approval on decision making behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 11–20.Google Scholar
  25. Kay, F. M., & Hagan, J. (1995). The persistent glass ceiling: Gendered inequalities in the earnings of lawyers. British Journal of Sociology, 46, 279–310.Google Scholar
  26. Kent, R. L., & Moss, S. E. (1994). Effects of sex and gender role on leader emergence. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1335–1346.Google Scholar
  27. Landau, J. & Arthur, M. B. (1992). The relationship of marital status, spouse's career status, and gender to salary level. Sex Roles, 27, 665–681.Google Scholar
  28. Larwood, L. & Gattiker, U. E. (1985). Rational bias and interorganizational power in the employment of management consultants. Group and Organization Studies, 10, 3–17.Google Scholar
  29. Larwood, L., Gutek, B., & Gattiker, U. E. (1984). Perspectives on institutional discrimination and resistance to change. Group and Organization Studies, 9, 333–352.Google Scholar
  30. Larwood, L., Szwajkowski, E., & Rose, S. (1988a). Sex and race discrimination resulting from manager-client relationships: Applying the rational bias theory of managerial discrimination. Sex Roles, 18, 9–29.Google Scholar
  31. Larwood, L., Szwajkowski, E., & Rose, S. (1988b). When discrimination makes “sense”: The rational bias theory. In B. A. Gutek, A. H. Stromberg, and L. Larwood (1988). Women and Work: Vol. 3. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Lefkowitz, J. (1994). Sex-related differences in job attitudes and dispositional variables: Now you see them. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 323–349.Google Scholar
  33. Locke, E. A. (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field setting. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  34. Lott, B. (1985). The devaluation of women's competence. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 43–60.Google Scholar
  35. Madden, J. F. (1985). Role differentiation and the gender gap in wage rates. In L. Larwood, B. A. Gutek, & A. H. Stromberg (Eds.), Women and work, Vol. 1. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Maupin, R. J. (1993). How can women's lack of upward mobility in accounting organizations be explained? Group and Organization Management, 18, 132–152.Google Scholar
  37. Northcraft, G. B., & Martin, J. (1982). Double jeopardy: Resistance to affirmative action from potential beneficiaries. In B. A. Gutek (Ed.), Sex role stereotyping and affirmative action policy. Los Angeles: UCLA Institute for Industrial Relations.Google Scholar
  38. Norusis, M. J. (1988). SPSS-PC+ base manual, vol. 2. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Orpen, C. (1992). The Work Locus of Control Scale as a predictor of employee attitudes and behavior: A validity study. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 29, 35–37.Google Scholar
  40. Owen, C. L., & Todor, W. D. (1993). Attitudes toward women as managers: Still the same. Business Horizons, 36, 12–16.Google Scholar
  41. Porter, N., Geis, F. L., & Jennings, J. (1983). Are women invisible as leaders? Sex Roles, 9, 1035–1049.Google Scholar
  42. Powell, G. N. (1993). Women and men in management (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1994). investigating the “glass ceiling” phenomenon: An empirical study of actual promotions to top management. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 68–86.Google Scholar
  44. Pugh, M. D., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762.Google Scholar
  45. Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, whole no. 609.Google Scholar
  46. Sapiro, V. (1994). Women in American society: An introduction to women's studies (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  47. Spector, P. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482–497.Google Scholar
  48. Spector, P. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 335–340.Google Scholar
  49. Stroh, L. H., Brett, J. M., & Reilly, A. H. (1992). All the right stuff: A comparison of female and male managers' career progression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 251–260.Google Scholar
  50. Szwajkowski, E., and Larwood, L. (1991). Rational decision processes and sex discrimination: Testing ‘rational’ bias theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 507–527.Google Scholar
  51. Tharenou, P., Latimer, S., & Conroy, D. (1994). How do you make it to the top? An examination of influences on women's and men's managerial advancement. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 899–931.Google Scholar
  52. Unger, R., and Crawford, M. (1992). Women and gender: A feminist psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  53. Wiley, M. G., & Eskilson, A. (1982). The interaction of sex and power base on perceptions of managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 671–677.Google Scholar
  54. Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 341–347.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Trentham
  • Laurie Larwood

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations