Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 539–552 | Cite as

Allocation of Attentional Resources During Habituation and Dishabituation of Male Sexual Arousal

  • Eric Koukounas
  • Ray Over
Article

Abstract

A secondary-task probe (tone) was presentedintermittently while men viewed erotic film segmentsacross a session involving 18 trials with the same filmsegment (habituation), then 2 trials with different film segments (novelty) and 2 trials withreinstatement of the original segment (dishabituation).Reaction time to the tone (an index of the extentprocessing resources were being committed to the erotic stimulus) shifted during the session inparallel with changes that occurred in penile tumescenceand subjective sexual arousal. The decrease in sexualarousal over the first 18 trials in the session was accompanied by a progressively faster reactionto the tone, novel stimulation led to recovery of sexualarousal and a slower reaction to the tone, and on trials21 and 22 sexual arousal and reaction time levels were above the values that prevailedimmediately prior to novel stimulation. Results arediscussed with reference to the relationship betweenhabituation and attention.

ATTENTIONAL RESOURCES MALE SEXUAL AROUSAL HABITUATION DISHABITUATION 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arntz, A., Dreesen, L., and Merckelbach, H. (1991). Attention, not anxiety, influences pain. Behav. Res. Ther. 29: 41–50.Google Scholar
  2. Bancroft, J. H., Jones, H. C., and Pullan, B. R. (1966). A single transducer for measuring penile erection with comments on its use in the treatment of sexual disorders. Behav. Res. Ther. 4: 239–241.Google Scholar
  3. Barlow, D. H. (1986). The causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.. 54: 140–148.Google Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M. (1968). Heterosexual behavior assessment—1. Males. Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 21–25.Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, M. R. (1990). Psychophysiology at the interface of clinical science, cognitive science, and neuroscience. Psychophysiology 27: 243–255.Google Scholar
  6. Dawson, M. R., Filion, D. L., and Schell, A. M. (1989). Is elicitation of the autonomic orienting response associated with allocation of processing resources? Psychophysiology 26: 560–572.Google Scholar
  7. Dawson, M. R., Schell, A. M., and Hazlett, E. A. (1991). The relationship between skin conductance orienting and the allocation of processing resources. Psychophysiology 28: 410–424.Google Scholar
  8. Dekker, J., and Everaerd, W. (1989). Psychological determinants of sexual arousal: A review. Behav. Res. Ther. 27: 353–364.Google Scholar
  9. Drummond, F., White, K., and Ashton, R. (1978). Imagery vividness affects habituation rate. Psychophysiology 15: 193–195.Google Scholar
  10. Farkas, G. M., Sine, L. F., and Evans, I. M. (1979). The effects of distraction, performance demand, stimulus explicitness, and personality on objective and subjective measures of male sexual arousal. Behav. Res. Ther. 17: 25–32.Google Scholar
  11. Geer, J. H., and Fuhr, R. (1976). Cognitive factors in sexual arousal: The role of distraction. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 44: 238–243.Google Scholar
  12. Julien, E., and Over, R. (1984). Male sexual arousal with repeated exposure to erotic stimuli. Arch. Sex. Behav. 13: 211–222.Google Scholar
  13. Koukounas, E., and Over, R. (1993). Habituation and dishabituation of male sexual arousal. Behav. Res. Ther. 31: 575–585.Google Scholar
  14. Laan, E., and Everaerd, W. (1995). Habituation of female sexual arousal to slides and. lm. Arch. Sex. Behav. 24: 517–541.Google Scholar
  15. Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., and Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology 30: 261–273.Google Scholar
  16. Meuwissen, I., and Over, R. (1990). Habituation and dishabituation of female sexual arousal. Behav. Res. Ther. 28: 217–226.Google Scholar
  17. O'Donohue, W. T., and Geer, J. H. (1985). The habituation of sexual arousal. Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 233–246.Google Scholar
  18. O'Donohue, W., and Plaud, J. J. (1991). The long-term habituation of sexual arousal in the human male. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 22: 87–96.Google Scholar
  19. O'Gorman, J. G. (1977). Individual differences in habituation of human physiological responses: A review of theory, method, and. ndings in the study of personality correlates in non-clinical populations. Biol. Psychol. 5: 257–318.Google Scholar
  20. Ohman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention, and learning: An information-processing perspective. In Kimmel, H. D., van Olst, E. H., and Orlebeke, J. F. (eds.), The Orienting Reflex in Humans. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 443–471.Google Scholar
  21. Over, R., and Koukounas, E. (1995). Habituation of sexual arousal: Product and process. Annu. Rev. Sex Res. 6: 187–223.Google Scholar
  22. Posner, M. I., and Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychol. Rev. 78: 391–408.Google Scholar
  23. Siddle, D. A. T., and Jordan, J. (1993). Effects of intermodality change on electrodermal orienting and on the allocation of processing resources. Psychophysiology 30: 429–436.Google Scholar
  24. Siddle, D. A. T., and Spinke, J. A. (1991). Orienting, habituation, and the allocation of processing resources. In Campbell, B., Richardson, R., and Hayne, H. (eds.), Attention and Information Processing in Infants and Adults: Perspectives from Human and Animal Research, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 227–262.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, D., and Over, R. (1987). Does fantasy-induced sexual arousal habituate? Behav. Res. Ther. 25: 477–485.Google Scholar
  26. Tellegen, A., and Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 83: 268–277.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Koukounas
  • Ray Over

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations