Journal of Community Health

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 115–130 | Cite as

Predictors of Compliance with Recommended Cervical Cancer Screening Schedule: A Population-Based Study

  • Eduardo J. Simoes
  • Craig J. Newschaffer
  • Nicola Hagdrup
  • Farnoush Ali-Abarghoui
  • Xi Tao
  • Nilsa Mack
  • Ross C. Brownson


Background: The prevalence of routine cervical cancer screening and compliance with screening schedules are low compared to the Year 2000 objectives. Identifying predictors of routine screening and screening schedule compliance will help achieve these objectives. Methods: We analyzed data from probability samples of 1,609 Missouri women responding to both the 1994 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the Missouri Enhanced Survey (ES). We generated prevalence odds ratios to identify predictors of non-compliance to cervical cancer screening guidelines. Also, among a sample of women reporting a reason for last Pap test, we estimated the relative odds of a screening v. diagnostic exam. Results: In the combined probability sample, compliance with screening schedule was likely among women younger than 50 years of age and women who had either a recent mammography or a clinical breast exam. Being African-American, not experiencing a cost barrier when seeking medical care, having at least a high-school education and health coverage were each associated with an increased compliance with a screening schedule in the combined probability sample. Among women in the combined probability sample, whites, those who experienced no cost barrier to seeking medical care, the non-obese, and those who had a recent mammography were each more likely to have had a screening as opposed to a diagnostic exam. Discussion: Cancer control and cardiovascular (CVD) prevention programs should consider jointly targeting those at high risk for cervical cancer and CVD because of aging and associated high-risk behavior such as non-compliance with cervical cancer screening, smoking, and obesity. Also, further research is needed to examine whether the increased compliance with cervical cancer screening guidelines among African American women may be in part due to higher occurrence of diagnostic Pap smears.


Cervical Cancer African American Woman Cervical Cancer Screening Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Clinical Breast 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    CDC. Hysterectomy Prevalence and Death Rates for Cervical Cancer Ð United States, 1965–1988. MMWR 1992; 41;2: 17–20.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holland B, Foster J, Louria D. Cervical Cancer and Health Care Resources in Newark, New Jersey 1970 to 1988. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 45–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makuc D, Freid V, Kleinman J. National trends in the use of preventive health care by women. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 21–26.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson l, May D. Has the Use of Cervical, Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Increased in the United States? Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 840–842.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kang S, Bloom J. Social Support and Cancer Screening Among Older Black Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 737–742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Public Health Service. Healthy People 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1991; DHHS Publication no (PHS)91–50212.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Missouri Department of Health. Division of Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. BCCCP Publications. 1994.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calle E, Flanders D, Thun M, Martin L. Demographic Predictors of Mammography and Pap Smear Screening in US Women. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 53–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernstein A, Thompson G, Harlan L. Differences in Rates of Cancer Screening by Usual Source of Medical Care. Data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. Med Care 1991; 29: 196–209.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kirkman-Liff B, Kronefeld J. Access to Cancer Screening Services for Women. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 733–735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Remington PL, Smith MY, Williamson DF, Anda RF, Gentry EM, Hogelin GC. Design, characteristics, and usefulness of the state-based behavioral risk factors surveillance: 1981–1987. Public Health Rep 1988; 103: 366–375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Centers for Health Statistics, Najar M, Rowland M. Anthropometric reference data and prevalence of overweight, United States, 1976–1980. Vital Stat 11 1987, 238. DHHS publication PHS 87–1688.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959; 22: 719–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hosmer DD, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression: Wiley Series in probability and mathematic statistics. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience; 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kleinbaun DG, Kupper LL, Mogenstern H. Epidemiologic research: principles and quantitative methods. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications, 1982Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sha BV. Software for survey data analysis (SUDAAN), Version 6.1. Research Triangle Park (NC): Research Triangle Institute. 1990.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Statistical Analysis System Institute Incorporated. SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1989, 846.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Massey JT, Botman SL. Weighting adjustments for random digit dialed surveys: In Groves RM <nt>et al. </nt>,<nt>(Eds)</nt>. Telephone survey methodology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1988: 143–160.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hayward R, Shapiro M, Freeman H, Corey C. Who Gets Screened for Cervical and Breast Cancer? Results from a New National Survey. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 1177–1181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lurie N, Manning W, Peterson C, et al. Preventive Care: Do We Practice What We Preach? JAMA 1987; 77: 801–804Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harlan L, Bernstein A, Kessler L. Cervical Cancer Screening: Who Is Not Screened and Why? Am J Public Health 1991; 81: 885–891.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Woodhandler S, Himmelstein D. Reverse Targeting of Preventive Care Due to Lack of Health Insurance. JAMA 1988; 259: 2872–2874.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chronic Disease in Minority Populations. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1992.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ries LAG, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Harras A, Edward BK <nt>(Eds)</nt>. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1994, National Cancer Institute. NIH Pub. No. 97–2789. Bethesda, MD, 1997.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Howe HL, Lehnherr M, Derrick L <nt>(Eds)</nt>. Cancer Incidence in North America, 1988–1992. Sacramento, CA: North-American Association of Central Cancer Registries, April 1996.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    1996 HIV/STD Kwik Facts. Missouri Department of Health, Bureau of STD/HIV Prevention. Jefferson City, MO, 997.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mayer JA, Slymen DJ, Wright BL, Elder JP, Williams SJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening in older women: The San Diego Medicare Preventive Health Project. J Prev Med 1992; 21(4): 395–404.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Boss L, Guckes F. Medicaid Coverage of Screening Tests for Breast and Cervical Cancer. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 252–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hueston W. Stiles M. The Papanicolaou Smear as a Sentinel Screening Test for Health screening in Women. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1473–1477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Katz S, Hofer T. Socioeconomic Disparities in Preventive Care Persist Despite Universal Coverage. Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Ontario and the United States. JAMA 1994; 272: 530–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hulshof KFAM, Wedel M, Lowik MRW, <nt>et al.</nt> Clustering of dietar y variables and other lifestyle factors (Dutch Nutritional Surveillance System). J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 417–424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zimmerman RS, Connor C. Health Promotion in context: the effects of significant others on health behavior change. Health Educ Q 1989; 13: 411–420.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simoes EJ, Byers T, Coates RJ, Serdula MK, Mokdad AH, Heath GW. The association between leisure-time physical activity and dietary fat in American Adults. Am J Public Health 1995; 85(2): 240–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hofer TP, Katz SJ. Healthy Behaviors among women in the United States and Ontario: The effect on use of preventive care. Am J Public Health 1997; 86(2): 1755–59.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stein AD, Lederman RI, Shea S. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire: its reliability in a statewide sample. Am J Public Health 1993; 83: 1768–1772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stein AD, Lederman RI, Shea S. Reproducibility of the women's module of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 1996; 6(1): 47–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bowlin SJ, Morril BD, Nafziger AN, Jenkins PL, Lewis C, Pearson TA. Validity of cardiovascular disease risk factors assessed by telephone survey: the Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 511–517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brownson RC, Jackson-Thompson J, Wilkerson JC, Kiani F. Reliability of information on chronic disease risk factors collected in the Missouri Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System. Epidemiology 1994; 5: 545–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gentry EM, Kalsbeek WD, Hogelin GC, et al. The Behavioral Risk Factor Survey: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined states. Am J Prev Med 1985; 1(6): 9–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo J. Simoes
  • Craig J. Newschaffer
  • Nicola Hagdrup
  • Farnoush Ali-Abarghoui
  • Xi Tao
  • Nilsa Mack
  • Ross C. Brownson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations