Sex Roles

, Volume 38, Issue 5–6, pp 331–362 | Cite as

Traditional Ideologies, Nontraditional Lives

  • Francine M. Deutsch
  • Susan E. Saxon
Article

Abstract

This study examined how blue-collar couples whoalternate work shifts and share the care of theirchildren reconcile their traditional gender ideologieswith their nontraditional lives. In-depth interviews were conducted with twenty-three alternatingshift couples in which the husband was a blue-collarworker. Ninety-six per cent of the participants wereWhite, and the remainder were Hispanic. The results suggested that despite their nontraditionalbehavior, these couples maintained traditional genderidentities by adherence to three central beliefs abouttheir families: 1) the father was still the breadwinner; 2) the mother only worked in the paid laborforce because of financial pressures; and 3) the motherwas still the central parent. The ways in which each ofthese myths is constructed, and the functions they serve of both maintaining traditionalgender identity, and of obscuring potential conflictsbetween husbands and wives over identity arediscussed.

Keywords

Social Psychology Work Shift Financial Pressure Central Parent Central Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bernard, J. (1981). The good provider role: Its rise and fall. The American Psychologist, 36, 1–12.Google Scholar
  2. Blumberg, R. L., & Coleman, M. T. (1989). A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in the American couple. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 225–250.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, T. F. (1993). What do fathers provide? Reconsidering the economic and nurturant dimensions of men as parents. In J. C. Hood (Ed.) Men, work, and family. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Coltrane, S. (1989). Household labor and the routine production of gender. Social Problems, 36, 473–490.Google Scholar
  5. Coltrane, S. (1990). Both timing and the division of labor in dual-earner families: Exploratory findings and suggestions for future research. Journal of Family Issues, 2, 157–181.Google Scholar
  6. Coltrane, S., & Valdez, E. D. (1993). Reluctant compliance: Work-family role allocation in dual-earner Chicano families. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Deutsch, F. M., Lozy, J. L., & Saxon, S. (1993). Taking credit: Couples' reports of contributions to childcare. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 421–437.Google Scholar
  9. Ehrenreich, B. (1987, July/August). The next wave: Something vast and angry is brewing in the pink-collar ghettos and the blue-collar suburbs. Ms. Magazine, 16, pp. 166–167, 216–218.Google Scholar
  10. Ehrensaft, D. (1987). Parenting together. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ferree, M. M. (1980). Working class feminism: A consideration of the consequences of employment. The Sociological Quarterly, 21, 173–184.Google Scholar
  12. Ferree, M. M. (1983). The women's movement in the working class. Sex Roles, 9, 493–505.Google Scholar
  13. Ferree, M. M. (1984a). The view from below: Women's employment and gender equality in working class families. In B. Hess & M. Sussman (Eds.), Women and the family: Two decades of change. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ferree, M. M. (1984b). Class, housework, and happiness: Women's work and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 11, 1057–1074.Google Scholar
  15. Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.Google Scholar
  16. Ferree, M. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158–180.Google Scholar
  17. Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gerson, K. (1993). No man's land: Men's changing commitments to family and work. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hammond, J. A., & Mahoney, C. W. (1983). Reward-cost balancing among women coalminers. Sex Roles, 9, 17–29.Google Scholar
  20. Hertz, R., & Charlton, J. (1989). Making family under a shiftwork schedule: Air force security guards and their wives. Social Problems, 36, 491–507.Google Scholar
  21. Hiller, D. V. (1984). Power dependence and division of family work. Sex Roles, 10, 1003–1019.Google Scholar
  22. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  23. Hollingshead, A. B. (1970). Four factor index of social status. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
  24. Hood, J. (1983). Becoming a two-job family. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  25. Hood, J. (1986). The provider role: Its meaning and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 349–359.Google Scholar
  26. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1990). Abbreviated measures of sex-role egalitarianism attitudes. Sex Roles, 23, 659–673.Google Scholar
  27. Komter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender and Society, 3, 187–216.Google Scholar
  28. Lamb, M. E. (Ed.). (1982). Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Lein, L. (1979). Male participation in home life: Impact of social supports and breadwinner responsibility on the allocation of tasks. The Family Coordinator, 28, 489–495.Google Scholar
  30. Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement, and the distribution of family labor. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 141–159.Google Scholar
  31. Mason, K. O., & Lu, Y. (1988). Attitudes toward women's familial roles: Changes in the United States, 1977–1985. Gender and Society, 2, 39–57.Google Scholar
  32. McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1992). You can't always get what you want: Incongruence between sex-role attitudes and family work roles and its implications for marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 537–547.Google Scholar
  33. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. O'Connell, M. (1993). Where's Papa? Fathers' role in childcare. (Population Trends and Public Policy No. 20). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  35. Osmond, M. W., & Thorne, B. (1993). Feminist theories: The social construction of gender in families and society. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Shumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  36. Perry-Jenkins, M., & Crouter, A. (1990). Men's provider-role attitudes: Implications for household work and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 136–156.Google Scholar
  37. Perry-Jenkins, M., & Folk, K. (1994). Class, couples, and conflict: Effects of the division of labor on assessments of marriage in dual-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 165–180.Google Scholar
  38. Peterson, R. R., & Gerson, K. (1992). Determinants of responsibility for child care arrangements among dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 527–536.Google Scholar
  39. Potuchek, J. (1992). Employed wives' orientation to breadwinning: A gender theory analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 548–558.Google Scholar
  40. Presser, H. B. (1986). Shift work among American women and child care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 551–563.Google Scholar
  41. Presser, H. B. (1988). Shift work and child care among young dual-earner American parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 133–143.Google Scholar
  42. Presser, H. B., & Cain, V. S. (1983). Shift work among dual-earner couples with children. Science, 219, 876–879.Google Scholar
  43. Radin, N. (1988). Primary caregiving fathers of long duration. In P. Bronstein & C. P. Cowan (Eds.), Fatherhood today: Men's changing role in the family. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Robboy, H. (1988). At work with the night worker. In C. Clark & H. Robboy (Eds.), Social interaction: Readings in sociology. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rosen, E. I. (1987). Bitter choices: Blue-collar women in and out of work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rubin, L. B. (1969). Worlds of pain: Life in the working class family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  47. Simon, B. L. (1990). Impact of shift work on individuals and families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 71, 342–348.Google Scholar
  48. Skolnick, A. (1991). Embattled paradise: The American family in an age of uncertainty. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  51. Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women's sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181–196.Google Scholar
  52. Thompson, L. (1993). Conceptualizing gender in marriage: The case of marital care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 557–569.Google Scholar
  53. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.Google Scholar
  54. West, C., & Zimmerman, H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.Google Scholar
  55. White, L., & Keith, B. (1990). The effect of shift work on the quality and stability of marital relations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 453–462.Google Scholar
  56. Wilkie, J. R. (1993). Changes in U.S. men's attitudes toward the family provider role, 1972–1989. Gender and Society, 7, 261–279.Google Scholar
  57. Willinger, B. (1993). Resistance and change: College men's attitudes toward family and work in the 1980s. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Zavella, P. (1987). Women's work and Chicano families. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francine M. Deutsch
  • Susan E. Saxon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations