Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between job-related stress and faculty intent to leave academia. The stress variables studied were reward satisfaction, institutional/departmental reputation, time commitment, departmental/institutional influence, and student interaction. We hypothesized that the relationship between these variables and faculty intent to leave academia would be moderated by interest in one's discipline and sense of community — an institutional fit variable. We also investigated the effects of academic discipline, tenure status, and gender on these relationships. Based on data from a national faculty survey of 3,070 full-time tenure-track faculty, results indicated that of the variables studied, the two major correlates of intent to leave academia were time commitment and sense of community; however, time commitment did not moderate the stressor-intent relationship. Though showing significant zero-order correlations with intent, when gender and tenure status were added to the hierarchical regression analyses containing the stressors and moderators, neither variable contributed meaningfully to the prediction of intent. Academic discipline classification (Biglan, 1973) contributed only 2% to explained variance. A prediction model that contained all stressors, both moderators, and the background variables of gender and academic discipline accounted for 25% of the variance in intent to leave academia.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barnes, M. W. (1983). Scholarly recognition in the study of higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology57: 195-203.
Blackburn, R. T., and Bentley, R. J. (1993). Faculty research productivity: Some moderators of associated stressors. Research in Higher Education34: 725-745.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1989, April). 1989 Survey Among Colleges and University Faculty (Archive No. USMISCHED89-CARN-FAC). New Jersey: The Wirthlin Group.
Cattell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research1: 245-276.
Cattell, R.B., and Jaspers, J. (1967). A general plasmode (No. 30-10-50-2) for factor analytic exercises and research. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, No. 67–3.
Clark, B. R. (1987). The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Clark, M. J. (1973). Organizational stress and professional performance among faculty members at a small college. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression for Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Creswell, J W., and Roskens, R. W. (1981, April). Biglan model test based on institutional diversity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika16: 297-334.
Gill, J. I., Norrell, S., and Kiplinger, V. (1992, January). Faculty supply and demand: Data sources and data needs. Research Dialogues, 32: 4-8. NY: Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association. Eric Document Reproduction Number ED 370–457.
Gmelch W. H., Lovrich, N. P., and Wilke, P. K. (1983). A national study of stress among university faculty members. Phi Delta Kappan65: 367.
Gmelch, W. H., Wilke, P. K., and Lovrich, N. P. (1986). Dimensions of stress among university faculty: Factor-analytic results from a national study. Research in Higher Education24: 266-286.
Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., and Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika23: 187-200.
Moracco, J. C., D'arienzo, R. V., and Danford, D. (1983). Comparison of perceived occupational stress between teachers who are contented and discontented in their career choices. The Vocational Guidance Quarterly, pp. 45-51.
Seiler, R. E., and Pearson, D. A. (1985). Dysfunctional stress among university faculty. Educational Research Quarterly9: 16-26.
Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education31(5): 405-424.
Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher25(2): 26-30.
Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (1992, March). Bringing into focus the factors affecting faculty supply and demand: A primer for higher education and state policymakers. Boulder: WICHE. Eric Document Reproduction Number ED 370–471.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnes, L.L.B., Agago, M.O. & Coombs, W.T. EFFECTS OF JOB-RELATED STRESS ON FACULTY INTENTION TO LEAVE ACADEMIA. Research in Higher Education 39, 457–469 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018741404199
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018741404199