Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 331–359 | Cite as

The Neosexual Revolution

  • Volkmar Sigusch


The affluent societies of the Western world have witnessed a tremendous cultural and social transformation of sexuality during the 1980s and 1990s, a process I refer to as the neosexual revolution. Up to now, this recoding and reassessment of sexuality has proceeded rather slowly and quietly. Yet both its real and its symbolic effects may indeed be more consequential than those brought about in the course of the rapid, noisy sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s. The neosexual revolution is dismantling the old patterns of sexuality and reassembling them anew. In the process, dimensions, intimate relationships, preferences, and sexual fragments emerge, many of which had been submerged, were unnamed, or simply did not exist before. In general, sexuality has lost much of its symbolic meaning as a cultural phenomenon. Sexuality is no longer the great metaphor for pleasure and happiness, nor is it so greatly overestimated as it was during the sexual revolution. It is now widely taken for granted, much like egotism or motility. Whereas sex was once mystified in a positive sense - as ecstasy and transgression, it has now taken on a negative mystification characterized by abuse, violence, and deadly infection. While the old sexuality was based primarily upon sexual instinct, orgasm, and the heterosexual couple, neosexualities revolve predominantly around gender difference, thrills, self-gratification, and prosthetic substitution. From the vast number of interrelated processes from which neosexualities emerge, three empirically observable phenomena have been selected for discussion here: the dissociation of the sexual sphere, the dispersion of sexual fragments, and the diversification of intimate relationships. These processes go hand in hand with the commercialization and banalization of sexuality. They are looked upon as being controlled individually through the mechanisms of a fundamentally egotistical consensus morality. In conformity with the general principles at work in society, the outcome of the neosexual revolution could be described as self-disciplined and self-optimized lean sexuality.



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bataille, G. (1957). L'Érotisme, Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, an d the Problem of Domination, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex,” Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Cesarano, G. (1974). Manuale di Sopravvivenza. Part II: L'Insurrezione Erotica, Nani Cesarano, Bari.Google Scholar
  5. Comfort, A. (1963). Sex in Society, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  6. Dannecker, M., and R. Reiche (1974). Der gewöhnliche Homosexuelle [The Everyday Homosexual] , Fischer, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  7. Elias, N. (1969). Ñber den Prozeβder Zivilisation [On the Process of Civilization], 2 vols, 2nd ed., Francke, Bern.Google Scholar
  8. Evola, J. (1958). Metafisica del Sesso, Atanòr, Rome.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1972). L'ordre du Discours, Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la Sexualité. Tome 1: La Volonté de Savoir, Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1895). Entwurf einer Psychologie [Model for a Science of Psychology]. In S. Freud, Aus den Anfängen der Psychoanalyse [From the Early Years of Psychoanalysis] , Imago, London 1950, pp. 371–466.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1992). Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  13. Green, R., and Money, J. (1960). Incongruous gender role: Nongenital manifestations in prepubertal boys. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 130: 160–167.Google Scholar
  14. Irigaray, L. (1984). Éthique de la Différence sexuelle, Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Kaplan, L. J. (1991). Female Perversions: The Temptations of Emma Bovary, Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human Sexual Response, Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Money, J. (1955). Hermaphroditism, gender and precocity in hyperadreno-corticism: Psychologic findings. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 96: 253–264.Google Scholar
  18. Money, J. (1985). Gender: History, theory and usage of the term in sexology and its relationship with nature/nurture. J. Sex Marital Ther. 11: 71–79.Google Scholar
  19. Reich, W. (1936). Die Sexualität im Kulturkampf [Sexuality on the Battlefield of Culture], Sexpol, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  20. Schmidt, G. (ed.) (1993). Jugendsexualität [Youth and Sexuality] , Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  21. Schmidt, G. (1996). Das Verschwinden der Sexualmoral [The Demise of Sexual Morals], Klein, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  22. Sigusch, V. (1984). Die Mystifikation des Sexuellen [The Mystification of the Sexual], Campus, Frankfurt and New York.Google Scholar
  23. Sigusch, V. (1988). Was heiβt kritische Sexualwissenschaft? [What is critical sexual science?]. Z. Sexualforsch. 1: 1–29.Google Scholar
  24. Sigusch, V. (1989). Kritik der disziplinierten Sexualität [A Criticism of Disciplined Sexuality], Campus, Frankfurt and New York.Google Scholar
  25. Sigusch, V. (1991a). Die Transsexuellen und unser nosomorpher Blick. Teil I: Zur Enttotalisierung des Transsexualismus [Transsexuals and our nosomorphic view. Part I: The detotalization of transsexualism]. Z. Sexualforsch. 4: 225–256.Google Scholar
  26. Sigusch, V. (1991b). Die Transsexuellen und unser nosomorpher Blick. Teil II: Zur Entpathologisierung des Transsexualismus [Transsexuals and our nosomorphic view. Part II: The depathologization of transsexualism]. Z. Sexualforsch. 4: 309–343.Google Scholar
  27. Sigusch, V. (1995a). Geschlechtswechsel [Sex Changes], Rotbuch, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  28. Sigusch, V. (1995b). Transsexueller Wunsch und zissexuelle Abwehr [Transsexual desire and cissexual defense]. Psyche 49: 811–837.Google Scholar
  29. Sigusch, V. (1995c). Anteros. In P. Weiermair (ed.), Erotic Art: From the 17th to the 20th Century, Stemmle, Kilchberg/Zurich, pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
  30. Sigusch, V. (1996a). Die Zerstreuung des Eros. Ñber die “neosexuelle Revolution” [The dispersion of Eros. On the “Neosexual Revolution”]. Der Spiegel 50(23): 126–130.Google Scholar
  31. Sigusch, V. (1996b). Die Trümmer der sexuellen Revolution [The Ruins of the Sexual Revolution]. Die Zeit 51(41): 33–34.Google Scholar
  32. Sigusch, V. (1997a). Kultureller Wandel der Sexualität [The Cultural Transformation of Sexuality]. In V. Sigusch (ed.), Sexuelle Störungen und ihre Behandlung [Sexual Disorders and their Treatment], 2nd ed., Thieme, Stuttgart, pp. 16–31.Google Scholar
  33. Sigusch, V. (1997b). Metamorphosen von Leben und Tod. Ausblick auf eine Theorie der Hylomatie [Metamorphoses of life and death. Prospects for a theory of hylomatia]. Psyche 51: 835–874.Google Scholar
  34. Sigusch, V., and Schmidt, G. (1973). Jugendsexualität [Youth and Sexuality], Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  35. Simon, W. (1994). Deviance as history: The future of perversion. Arch. Sex. Behav. 23: 1–20.Google Scholar
  36. Stoller, R. J. (1968). Sex and Gender: Vol. I. The Development of Masculinity and Femininity, Science House, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Stoller, R. J. (1975). Perversion: The Erotic Form of Hatred, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex Is Not a Natural Act and Other Essays, Westview, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  39. Ussel, J. van (1975). Intimiteit [Intimacy] , Van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer.Google Scholar
  40. Wouters, C. (1994). Duerr und Elias. Scham und Gewalt in Zivilisations-prozessen [Duerr and Elias: Shame and violence in the processes of civilization]. Z. Sexualforsch. 7: 203–216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volkmar Sigusch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations