Advertisement

Neural Processing Letters

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 97–106 | Cite as

Stability Properties of Cerebellar Neural Networks: The Purkinje Cell — Climbing Fiber Dynamic Module

  • Witali L. Dunin-Barkowski
  • Serge L. Shishkin
  • Donald C. Wunsch
Article

Abstract

In the last few decades it has been proven, that the cerebellum takes part in learning the bulk of motor control. The mechanisms which provide such properties are still largely unknown, but an involvement of parallel fibers and climbing fibers in this process, as have been proposed decades ago in cerebellar learning theories, is now clear. Among difficulties of the learning theories is an evident necessity for spontaneous activity of the cerebellar climbing fibers [5]. Recently, the group of M. Mauk proposed an elegant explanation of this inconsistency [11, 12]. We present here a stochastic model of a cerebellar module, based on this new approach. Theoretical treatment yields some consequences for experimental verification. Besides an explanation of real cerebellar functions, the analyzed control system presents a new paradigm for neural network memorizing systems.

neural networks stability oscillatory systems cerebellum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.S. Albus, “A theory of cerebellar function”, Math. Biosci., Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 25–61, 1971.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V.G. Boltianski, E.F. Mischenko, L.S. Pontryagin, R.V. Gamkrelidze, Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, Nauka Publishers: Moscow, 1970 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Brindley, “The use, made by the cerebellum of the information that it receives from sense organs”, IBRO Bulletin, Vol. 3, p. 80, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.M. Chajlakhian, L.I. Chudakov, W.L. Dunin-Barkowski, M.B. Kozhemiakin, N.M. Zhukowska, “Synaptic Interaction of granule cells and climbing fiber on Purkinje cell”, RNNS/IEEE Symposium on Neuroinformatics and Neurocomputers, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, Vol. 1, pp. 377–386, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Colin, J. Manil, J.C. Desclin, “The olivocerebellar system. Delayed and slow inhibitory effects: an overlooked salient feature of the cerebellar climbing fibers”, Brain Res., Vol. 187, pp. 3–27, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.L. Dunin-Barkowski, Information Processing in Neural Structures, Nauka Publishers: Moscow, 1978 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.L. Dunin-Barkowski, N.P. Larionova, “Computer simulation of a cerebellar cortex compartment. Parts I&II”, Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 51, pp. 399–415, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.L. Dunin-Barkowski, N.M. Zhukowska, N.P. Larionova, L.M. Chajlakhian, L.I. Chudakov, “Parallel fibers - Purkinje cell synaptic effectiveness increases after simultaneous stimulation of climbing and parallel fibers”, Neurofiziologia (Kiev), Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 156–164, 1987 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Ebner, J. Bloedel, “Role of climbing fiber afferent input in determining responsiveness of Purkinje cells to mossy fibers inputs”, J. Neurophysiol., Vol. 45, pp. 962–971, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.H. Fagg, N. Sitkoff, A.G. Barto, J.C. Houk, “Cerebellar learning for control of a two-link arm in muscle space”, http://cs.umass.edu/, pp. 1–8, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Grossberg, “On learning of spatiotemporal patterns by networks with ordered sensory and motor components: Excitatory components of the cerebellum”, Studies in Applied Mathematics Vol. 48, pp. 105–132, 1969.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Ito, The Cerebellum and Motor Control, Raven Press: New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.T. Kenyon, J.F. Medina, M.D. Mauk, “A mathematical model of the cerebello-olivary system. I. Self-regulating equilibrium of climbing fiber activity”, J. Computational Neuroscience, Vol. 5, pp. 17–33, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.T. Kenyon, J.F. Medina, M.D. Mauk, “A mathematical model of the cerebello-olivary system. II. Motor adaptation through systematic disruption of climbing fiber equilibrium”, J. Computational Neuroscience, Vol. 5, pp. 71–90, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C.S. Leonard, J.I. Simpson, “Simple spike modulation of floccular Purkinje cells during the reversible blocade of their climbing fiber afferents”, Adaptive Processes in Visual and Oculomotor Systems, pp. 429–434, Pergamon Press: Oxford, NY, 1985.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Llinas, J.P. Welsh, “On the cerebellum and motor learning”, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., Vol. 3, pp. 958–968, 1993.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. Marr, “A theory of cerebellar cortex”, J. Physiol., Vol. 202, pp. 437–470, 1969.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D.V. Prokhorov, D.C. Wunsch, “Adaptive critics designs”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 8, No. 5., pp. 997–1007, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.S. Sutton, Generalization in Reinforcement Learning: Successful Examples Using Sparse Coarse Coding, Advances in NIPS, pp. 1038–1044, MIT Press, Vol. 8, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    P.J. Werbos, “Building and understanding adaptive systems: A statistical/numerical approach to factory automation and brain research”, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 34–40, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Witali L. Dunin-Barkowski
    • 1
  • Serge L. Shishkin
    • 1
  • Donald C. Wunsch
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Computational Intelligence LaboratoryTexas Tech UniversityLubbockU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations