IIE Transactions

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 641–650 | Cite as

On postponement strategies for product families with multiple points of differentiation

  • AMIT GARG
  • CHRISTOPHER S. TANG
Article

Abstract

Several researchers have studied the benefits of product and process design that calls for delaying the differentiation of products. Previous research has focused on products having only one point of differentiation. However, in reality most product families have several points of differentiation. In this paper, we develop two models to study products with more than one point of differentiation. In each model, we examine the benefits of delayed differentiation at each of these points, and derive the necessary conditions when one type of delayed differentiation is more beneficial than the other. Our analysis indicates that demand variabilities, correlations and the relative magnitudes of the lead times play an important role in determining which point of differentiation should be delayed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ho, T. and Tang, C. (1995) Product line extension: the right way?. Working paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Simison, R.L. and Suris, O. (1995) Racing Cars-Alex Trotman's goal: To make Ford no.1 in world auto sales; but some fear the Chairman may slight profitability; GM says it isn't worried; the art of finding a balance. The Wall Street Journal (1995) July 18, p. A1.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Lee, H.L. (1993) Design for supply chain management: methods and examples, in Perspectives in Operations Management Sarin, R. (ed.), Kluwer, Boston, MA. pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Garg, A. (1995) Product and process design strategies for effective supply chain management. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Lee, H.L. (1996) Effective management of inventory and service through product and process redesign. Operations Research, 44(1), 151–159.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lee, H.L. and Tang, C. (1997) Modeling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Management Science, 43(1), 40–53.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Eppen, G. and Schrage, L. (1981) Centralized ordering policies in a multi-warehouse system with lead times and random demand, in Multi-Level Production/Inventory Systems: Theory and Practice, Schwarz, L.B. (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 51–69.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Erkip, N., Hausman, W. and Nahmias, S. (1990) Optimal centralized ordering policies in multi-echelon inventory systems with correlated demands. Management Science, 36, 381–392.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lee, H.L. (1992) Single and Multiple Location Stochastic Inventory Models, Lecture Notes, Department of Industrial Engineering-Engineering Management, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • AMIT GARG
    • 1
  • CHRISTOPHER S. TANG
    • 2
  1. 1.Thomas J. Watson Research CenterIBMYorktown HeightsUSA
  2. 2.Anderson Graduate School of ManagementUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations