Urban Ecosystems

, 1:155 | Cite as

Understory plant species composition in remnant stands along an urban-to-rural land-use gradient

  • G. R. Guntenspergen
  • James B. Levenson


We examined the understory species composition of 24 remnant forest stands along an urban-to-rural gradient in the metropolitan Milwaukee, Wisconsin region to determine the relationships between plant community composition, human disturbance, and contrasting types of land use along a gradient of urbanization. A significant difference was found in shrub species community composition among three contrasting land-use categories but no significant difference was found in herbaceous community composition. Significant differences in human activity existed among rural, urban, and urbanizing land-use categories, but this index of disturbance was not significantly correlated to gradients in species composition. All stands in this study had been subjected to various types of human activity and environmental disturbances in the past. Our data suggest that differences in the relative importance of understory species exist among stands but these differences may not be caused by the impacts of urbanization alone. Changes in the natural disturbance regime of this landscape, along with the impacts associated with urbanization, have led to an individualistic response in the compositional dynamics of forest stands.

urban rural gradients land use biological conservation 


  1. Airola, T. M. and Buchholz, K. (1984) Species structure and soil characteristics of five urban forest sites along the New Jersey Palisades. Urban Ecol. 8, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auclair, A. N. (1976) Ecological factors in the development of intensive-management ecosystems in the midwestern United States. Ecology 57, 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auclair, A. N. and Cottam, G. (1971) Dynamics of black cherry (Prunus serotina Erhr.) in southern Wisconsin oak forests. Ecol.Monogr. 41, 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, K. J., Kvamme, K. L. and Mielke P. W., Jr. (1983) Improvements in the permutation test for the spatial analysis of the distribution of artifacts into classes. Am.Antiquity 48, 547–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehmer, C. M. (1976) A phytosociological study of the voluntary urban vegetation of Racine, Wisconsin. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 100 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Brady, R. F., Tobias, T., Eagles, P. F. J., Ohrner, R., Micak, J., Veale, B. and Dorney, R. S. (1979) A typology for the urban ecosystem and its relationship to larger biogeographical landscape units. Urban Ecol. 4, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bray, J. R. and Curtis, J. T. (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol.Monogr. 27, 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunner, M. C. (1977). Vegetation of forest edges. M.S. Thesis. University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 58 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Curtis, J. T. (1959) The vegetation of Wisconsin – an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 675 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Dorney, J. R., Guntenspergen, G. R., Keough, J. R. and Stearns, F. (1984) Composition and structure of an urban woody plant community. Urban Ecol. 8, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunn, C. P. and Loehle, C. (1988) Species-area parameter estimation: testing the null model of lack of relationship. J.Biogeogr. 15, 721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forman, R. T. T. (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions, University Press, Cambridge, 632 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Freedman, B. and Hutchinson, T. C. (1980) Long-term effects of smelter pollution at Sudbury, Ontario, on forest community composition. Can.J.Bot. 58, 2123–2140.Google Scholar
  14. Gibson, D. J., Collins, S. L. and Good, R. E. (1988) Ecosystem fragmentation of oak-pine forest in the New Jersey Pinelands. Forest Ecol.Manag. 25, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gleason, H. A.(1952) The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern U.S.and adjacent Canada. Hafner Publishing Company, Inc., New York, 3 vols. 1732 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Godron, M. and Forman, R. T. T. (1983) Landscape modification and changing ecological characteristics. In Disturbance and ecosystems: components of response (H. A. Mooney and M. Godron, eds), pp. 12–28. Springer– Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Greller, A. M. (1975). Persisting natural vegetation in northern Queens County, New York with proposals for its conservation. Environ.Conserv. 2, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamabata, E. (1980) Changes of herb-shrub layer species composition with urbanization in secondary oak forests of Musashino Plain near Tokyo: studies of the conservation of suburban forest stands. Jpn.J.Ecol. 30, 347–358.Google Scholar
  19. Harper, K. T. (1963) Structure and dynamics of the maple-basswood forests of southern Wisconsin. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 116 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, L. (1984) The fragmented forest: island biogeography and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 211 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Henderson, N. R. and Long, J. N. (1984) A comparison of stand structure and fire history in two black oak woodlots in northwestern Indiana. Botanical Gazette 145, 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hobbs, E. (1988) Using ordination to analyze the composition and structure of urban forest islands. Forest Ecol.Manag. 23, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoehne, L. M. (1981) The groundlayer vegetation of forest islands in an urban-suburban matrix. In Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes (R. L. Burgess and D. M. Sharpe, eds), pp. 41–54. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Holzner, W. M., Werger, J. A. and Ikusima, I., eds. (1983) Man's impact on vegetation. Dr. W. Junk Publishers. The Hague, The Netherlands, 370 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Kenkel, N. G. and Orloci, L. (1986) Applying metric and non-metric multidimensional scaling to ecological studies and some new results. Ecology 67, 919–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kent, M. and Ballard, J. (1988) Trends and problems in the application of classification and ordination methods in plant ecology. Vegetatio 78, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kruskal, J. B. (1964) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levenson, J. B. (1976) Forested woodlots as biogeographic islands in an urban-agricultural matrix.Ph.D.Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 101 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Levenson, J. B. (1981) The southern-mesic forest of southeastern Wisconsin: species composition and community structure. Contributions in Biology and Geology 41. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 246 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Lindsey, A. A. (1955) Testing the line-strip method against full tallies in diverse forest types. Ecology 36, 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loeb, R. E. (1982) Reliability of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation's forest records. Bull.Torrey Bot.Club 109, 537–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maarel, E. van der (1971) Plant species diversity in relation to management. In The scientific management of animal and plant communities for conservation (E. Duffy and A. S. Watt, eds.), Symp. British Ecological Society 11. Blackwell, Oxford, 45–63.Google Scholar
  33. Mather, P. M. (1976) Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. John Wiley and Sons, London, 532 pp.Google Scholar
  34. McCune, B. (1994) Improving community analysis with the Beals smoothing function. Ecoscience 1, 82–86.Google Scholar
  35. McCune, B. and Cottam, G. (1985) The successional status of a southern Wisconsin oak woods. Ecology 66, 1270–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McDonnell, M. J. and Pickett, S. T. A. (1990) The study of ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexplored opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71, 1231–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDonnell, M. J., Pickett, S. T. A. Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R. V., Zipperer, W. C., Parmalee, R. W., Carreiro, M. M. and Medley, K. (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McIntosh, R. P. (1985) The background of ecology: concept and theory. University Press, Cambridge, 383 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Meyer, W. B. and Turner, B. L. II, eds. (1994) Changes in land use and land cover: a global perspective – papers arising form the 1991 OIES Global Change Institute. University Press, Cambridge, 537 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Middleton, J. and Merriam, G. (1983) Distribution of woodland species in farmland woods. J.Appl.Ecol. 20, 625–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mielke, P. W., Jr. (1984) Meteorological applications of permutation techniques based on distance functions. In Handbook of statistics, volume 4, (P. R. Krishnaiah and P. K. Sen, eds), Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 813–830.Google Scholar
  42. Minchin, P. R. (1987) An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MJM Software. (1995) PC-ORD Version 2.0. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. MJM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, 126 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Moran, M. A. (1984) Influence of adjacent land use on understory vegetation of New York forests. Urban Ecol. 8, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Numata, M. (1977) The impact of urbanization on vegetation in Japan. In Vegetation science and environmental protection (A. Miyawaki and R. Tuxen, eds), pp. 161–171. Tokyo, Maruzen.Google Scholar
  46. Ohga, N. (1979) Changes in distribution of vegetation types at Ichara City. In Integrated ecological studies in Bay-Coast cities (M. Numata, ed), pp. 61–69. Chiba, Japan.Google Scholar
  47. Orloci, L. (1967) An agglomerative method for classification of plant communities. J.Ecol. 55, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pearson, C. J. (1976) Vegetation and environmental changes associated with intensification of agriculture near cities: a study of Sydney, Australia. Agric.Environ. 3, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peet, R. K. and Louckes, O. L. (1977) A gradient analysis of southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology 58, 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peterken, G. F. and Game, M. (1984) Historical factors affecting the number and distribution of vascular plant species in the woodlands of central Lincolnshire. J.Ecol. 72, 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Profous, G. V. and Loeb, R. E. (1984) Vegetation and plant communities of Van Cortlandt Park, Bronx, New York. Bull.Torrey Bot.Club 111, 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rieley, J. O. and Page, S. E. (1995) Survey, mapping, and evaluation of green space in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. In Urban ecology as the basis for urban planning (H. Sukopp, M. Numata, and A. Huber, eds), pp. 173–184. SPB Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  53. Rudnicky, J. L. and McDonnell, M. J. (1989) Forty-eight years of canopy change in a hemlock-hardwood forest in New York City. Bull.Torrey Bot.Club 116, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schmid, J. A. (1975) Urban vegetation – a review and Chicago case study. Research Paper 161, Department of Geography, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 266 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Sharpe, D. M., Stearns, F. W., Burgess, R. L. and Johnson, W. C. (1981) Spatio-temporal patterns of forest ecosystems in man-dominated landscapes of the eastern United States. Proc. Int. Congr. Neth. Soc. Landscape Ecology, Veldhoven. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp. 109–116.Google Scholar
  56. Sharpe, D. M., Stearns, F. W., Leitner, L. A. and Dorney, J. R. (1986) Fate of natural vegetation during urban development of rural landscapes in southeastern Wisconsin. Urban Ecol. 9, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sharpe, D. M., Guntenspergen, G. R., Dunn, C. P., Leitner, L. A. and Stearns, F. W. (1987) Vegetation dynamics in a southern Wisconsin agricultural landscape. In Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance (M. G. Turner, ed), pp. 137–155. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Shelton, N. (1974) Effects of urbanization on vegetation pattern: the case of Detroit, Michigan. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  59. Shinners, L. H. (1940) The vegetation of the Milwaukee region. B.A. Thesis. University of Wisconsin, 87 pp. and 12 maps.Google Scholar
  60. Stalter, R. (1981) A thirty-nine year history of the arborescent vegetation of Alley Park, Queens County, New York. Bull.Torrey Bot.Club 108, 485–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sukopp, H., Numata, M. and Huber, A., eds. (1995) Urban ecology as the basis of urban planning. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 218 pp.Google Scholar
  62. Thomas, W. L., Jr., ed. (1956) Man's role in changing the face of the earth. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1193 pp.Google Scholar
  63. Tong, S. T. Y. (1989) On non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination and interpretation of the Mattoral vegetation in lowland Murcia. Vegetatio 79, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tuomisto, H., Ruokolainen, K., Kalliola, R., Linna, A., Danjoy, W. and Rodriguez, Z. (1995) Dissecting Amazonian biodiversity. Science 269, 63–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Weaver, M. and Kellman, M. (1981) The effects of forest fragmentation on woodlot tree biotas in southern Ontario. J.Biogeogr. 8, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whitney, G. G. and Adams, S. D. (1980). Man as a marker of new plant communities. J.Appl.Ecol. 17, 431–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Whittaker, R. H. (1967) Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol.Rev. 49, 207–264.Google Scholar
  68. Whittaker, R. H. (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21, 213–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wishart, D. (1969) An algorithm for hierarchical classifications. Biometrics 25, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Whitford, P. B. and Salamun, P. J. (1954). An upland forest survey of the Milwaukee area. Ecology 35, 533–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zimmerman, G. M., Goetz, H. and Mielke, P. W., Jr. (1985) Use of an improved statistical method for group comparisons to study effects of prairie fire. Ecology 66, 606–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. R. Guntenspergen
    • 1
  • James B. Levenson
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyNorthern Prairie Wildlife Research CenterJamestownUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Assessment DivisionArgonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA

Personalised recommendations