Chromosome Research

, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp 363–373 | Cite as

The STR120 satellite DNA of soybean: organization, evolution and chromosomal specificity

  • M. Morgante
  • I. Jurman
  • L. Shi
  • T. Zhu
  • P. Keim
  • J. A. Rafalski


A highly repeated DNA sequence family, STR120, with tandemly arranged repetitive units (monomers) of approximately 120 bp, has been identified in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Five related clones showing tandem repeats of a 120-bp-long monomer were isolated from a soybean genomic library. Results of Southern blotting experiments using three of the clones as probes onto genomic DNA digested with different restriction enzymes were in agreement with a tandem arrangement of these sequences in the genome. A total of 12 monomers were sequenced, showing considerable sequence heterogeneity. A consensus sequence of 126 bp was obtained that exhibits an average similarity of 81% to the sequenced units. In three of the clones identified, neighbouring units are significantly more similar to each other than to units from different clones; in the remaining two clones, however, similarity between the two units observed is low (70%), while the overall similarity between the two clones is high (95%). This indicates that in these cases the repetitive unit may be the dimer rather than the monomer. Based on the presence of direct repeats within each monomer, we suggest that the 120-bp monomer may itself have evolved by duplication of an ancestral 60-bp unit. The STR120 family distribution is limited to annual soybeans and is not found, at least at high-copy number, in related perennial soybeans or other members of the tribe Phaseolae. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to metaphase chromosomes using four of the clones as probes shows that the number of chromosomal locations differs depending on the stringency conditions and goes from two to eight when the stringency is progressively lowered. The estimated copy number for one of the clones is from 5000 to 10 000, but this may just represent a lower boundary for the whole family in consideration of the high sequence divergence observed within the family. FISH and sequence analysis therefore indicate that different subfamilies as well as higher-order repeat units are present in the STR120 family, very much like those in primate alpha satellite DNA, and that some of the subfamilies seem to exhibit divergence on a chromosomal basis.

duplication fluorescence in situ hybridization repetitive DNA sequence divergence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 4043–410.Google Scholar
  2. Armour JAL, Jeffreys AJ (1992) Biology and applications of human minisatellite loci. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2: 850–856.Google Scholar
  3. Arumuganatheum K, Earle ED(1991) Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rept 9: 208–218.Google Scholar
  4. Capesius I (1983) Sequence of the cryptic satellite DNA from the plant Sinapis alba. Biochem Biophys Acta 739: 276–280.Google Scholar
  5. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1993) Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the papillionoid legume tribe Phaseolae. Sys Bot 18: 309–327.Google Scholar
  6. Fabijanski S, Fedak G, Armstrong K, Altossar I (1990) A repeated sequence probe for the C genome in Avena(oats). Theor Appl Genet 79: 1–7.Google Scholar
  7. Ganal M, Riede I, Hemleben V (1986) Organization and sequence analysis of two related satellite DNAs in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. ). J Mol Evol 23: 23–30.Google Scholar
  8. Ganal MW, Lapitan NLV, Tanskley SV (1988) A molecular and cytogenetic survey of major repeated DNA sequences in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Mol Gen Genet 213: 262–268.Google Scholar
  9. Grellet F, Dominique D, Panabieres F, Delseny M (1986) Organization and evolution of a higher plant alphoid-like DNA sequence. J Mol Biol 187: 495–507.Google Scholar
  10. Griffor MC, Vodkin LO, Singh RJ, Hymovitz T (1991) Fluorescent in situ hybridization to soybean metaphase chromosomes. Plant Mol Biol 17: 101–109.Google Scholar
  11. Harbinder S, Gupta V, Lakshmikumaran M (1992) Fluidity of the 350 bp tandemly repeated DNA family of Brassica nigra. Plant Mol Biol 18: 1213–1216.Google Scholar
  12. Ingham LD, Hanna WW, Baier JW, Hannah LC (1993) Origin of the main class of repetitive DNA within selected Pennisetum species. Mol Gen Genet 238: 350–356.Google Scholar
  13. Kato A, Yakura K, Tanifuji S (1984) Sequence analysis of Vicia faba repeated DNA, the FokI repeat element. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 6415–6426.Google Scholar
  14. Keim P, Olson TC, Shoemaker RC (1988) A rapid protocol for isolating soybean DNA. Soybean Genet Newslett 15: 150–152.Google Scholar
  15. Keim P, Beavis W, Schupp J, Freestone R (1992) Evaluation of soybean RFLP marker diversity in adapted germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 85: 205–212.Google Scholar
  16. Kolchinsky A, Gresshoff PM (1995) A major satellite DNA of soybean is a 92-base pairs tandem repeat. Theor Appl Genet 90: 621–626.Google Scholar
  17. Levinson G, Gutman GA (1987) Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 4: 2023–2221.Google Scholar
  18. Maluszynska J, Heslop-Harrison JS (1993) Physical mapping of rDNA in Brassica species. Genome 36: 774–781.Google Scholar
  19. Martinez-Balbas A, Rodriguez-Campos A, Gracia-Ramirez M et al. (1989) Satellite DNAs contain sequences that induce curvature. Biochemistry 29: 2342–2348.Google Scholar
  20. Martinez-Zapater JM, Estelle MA, Somerville CR (1986) A highly repeated DNA sequence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 204: 417–423.Google Scholar
  21. Miklos GLG (1985) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. MacIntyre RJ, (ed). New York: Plenum. pp 241–321.Google Scholar
  22. Miklos GLG, Gill AC (1982) Nucleotide sequences of highly repeated DNAs; compilation and comments. Genet Res 39: 1–30.Google Scholar
  23. Morgante M, Rafalski A, Biddle P, Tingey SV, Olivieri AM (1994) Genetic mapping and variability of seven soybean microsatellite loci. Genome 37: 763–769.Google Scholar
  24. Ohtsubo H, Umeda M, Ohtsubo E (1991) Organization of DNA sequences highly repeated in tandem in rice genomes. Jpn J Genet 66: 241–254.Google Scholar
  25. Palmer RG, Kilen TC (1987) Quantitative genetics and cytogenetics. In: Wilcox JR, ed. Soybeans: Improvement, Production and Uses. 2nd edn. Agron Ser 16. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, pp 135–209.Google Scholar
  26. Peacock WJ, Dennis ES, Rhoades MM, Pryor AJ (1981) Repeated DNA limited. to knob heterochromatin in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 4490–4494.Google Scholar
  27. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ (1988) Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 2444–2448.Google Scholar
  28. Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW (1986) Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 2934–2938.Google Scholar
  29. Program Manual for the GCG Package, Version 7, April 1991, 575 Science Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, USA 53711.Google Scholar
  30. Rafalski, JA, Tingey, SV (1993) RFLP map of soybean (Glycine max) 2N = 40. In: O'Brien SJ, ed. Genetic Maps, Locus maps of Complex Genomes. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp 6.149–6.156.Google Scholar
  31. Roy P, Bhattacharyya N, Biswas BB (1988) Isolation, characterization and sequencing of a novel repetitive DNA from the mung bean Vigna radiata. Gene 73: 57–66.Google Scholar
  32. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sheperd AL, Anderson S, Smith SM (1990) Species-specific repeated DNA sequences from Petunia. Plant Science 67: 57–72.Google Scholar
  34. Shi L, Zhu T, Morgante M, Rafalski, Keim P (1996) Soybean chromosome painting: a strategy for somatic cytogenetics. J Hered 87: 308–313.Google Scholar
  35. Shoemaker RC, Guffy RD, Lorenzen LL, Specht JE (1992) Molecular genetic mapping of soybean: map utilization. Crop Sci 32: 1091–1098.Google Scholar
  36. Tautz D, Schloetterer C (1994) Simple sequences. Curr Opin Genet Dev 4: 832–837.Google Scholar
  37. Vahedian M, Shi L, Zhu T, Okimoto R, Dana K, Keim P (1995) Genomic organization and evolution of the soybean SB92 satellite sequence. Plant Mol Biol 29: 857–862.Google Scholar
  38. Vogt P (1992) Code domains in tandem repetitive DNA sequence structures. Chromosoma 101: 585–589.Google Scholar
  39. Willard HF (1985) Chromosome-specific organization of human á satellite DNA. Am J Hum Genet 37: 524–532.Google Scholar
  40. Willard HF (1991) Evolution of alpha satellite. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1: 509–514.Google Scholar
  41. Wu T, Wu R (1992) A novel repetitive DNA sequence in the genus Oryza. Theor Appl Genet 84: 136–144.Google Scholar
  42. Zhu T, Schupp JM, Oliphant A, Keim P (1994) Hypomethylated. sequences: characterization of the duplicated soybean genome. Mol Gen Genet 244: 638–645.Google Scholar
  43. Zhu T, Shi L, Keim P (1995a) Fluorescence in situ detection of short single-copy sequences in soybean. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13: 270–277.Google Scholar
  44. Zhu T, Shi L, Doyle J, Keim P (1995b) Phylogenetic analysis of a single locus sequence in soybean and its relatives. Theor Appl Genet 90: 991–999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Morgante
    • 1
  • I. Jurman
    • 2
  • L. Shi
    • 3
  • T. Zhu
    • 3
  • P. Keim
    • 3
  • J. A. Rafalski
    • 1
  1. 1.Du Pont Agricultural ProductsBiotechnology ResearchWilmingtonUSA
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Produzione Vegetale e Tecnologie AgrarieUniversita' di UdineUdineItaly
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations