Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 5–12 | Cite as

Are Lepidoptera an effective ‘umbrella group‘ for biodiversity conservation?

  • T.R. New


Lepidoptera have attracted more attention than other insects in the development of insect conservation, commonly as charismatic ‘flagship‘ species. Wider benefits of conservation studies on single species include developing and clarifying their role as putative ‘umbrella‘ taxa whereby their protection also confers protection on coexisting organisms which are not as well documented. Examples are given of such umbrella Lepidoptera from the Australian region, and the values of documenting and defining changes in lepidopteran assemblages (for example, through analysis of light-trap catches of moths) as correlates of environmental change are outlined. Selection of optimal groups depends on documenting responses of both species and higher taxa to changes in vegetation or microclimate in particular. Potent umbrella taxa manifest many of the features of indicator and flagship taxa.

butterfly moth flagship species diversity habitat change light-traps 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barlow, H.S. and Woiwod, I.P. (1989) Moth diversity of a tropical forest in Peninsular Malaysia. J. Trop. Ecol. 5, 37–50.Google Scholar
  2. Beccaloni, G.W. and Gaston, K.J. (1995) Predicting the species richness of Neotropical forest butterflies: Ithomiinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as indicators. Biol. Conserv. 71, 77–86.Google Scholar
  3. Britton, D.R., New, T.R. and Jelinek, A. (1995) Rare Lepidoptera at Mount Piper, Victoria–the role of a threatened butterfly community in advancing understanding of insect conservation. J. Lepidopt. Soc. 49, 97–113.Google Scholar
  4. Brown Jr, K.S. (1991) Conservation of Neotropical environments: insects as indicators. In The conservation of insects and their habitats(N.M. Collins and J.A. Thomas, eds) pp. 350–404. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Common, I.F.B. (1994) Oecophorine genera of Australia I. The Wingia group (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). CSIRO: Melbourne.Google Scholar
  6. Erhardt, A. (1985) Diurnal Lepidoptera: sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J. Appl. Ecol. 22, 849–61.Google Scholar
  7. Erhardt, A. and Thomas, J.A. (1991) Lepidoptera as indicators of change in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. In The conservation of insects and their habitats(N.M. Collins & J.A. Thomas, eds) pp. 213–36. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hebert, P.D.N. (1980) Moth communities in montane Papua New Guinea. J. Anim. Ecol. 49, 593–602.Google Scholar
  9. Hebert, P.D.N. and Harmsen, R. (1984) Species diversity patterns in moth communities of Papua New Guinea. In Tropical Rain-Forest. The Leeds Symposium(A.C. Chadwick and S.L. Sutton, eds) pp. 306–7. Special Publication of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society.Google Scholar
  10. Holl, K.D. (1996) The effect of coal surface mine reclamation on diurnal lepidopteran conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 225–36.Google Scholar
  11. Holloway, J.D. (1977) The Lepidoptera of Norfolk Island, their biogeography and ecology. The Hague: W. Junk.Google Scholar
  12. Holloway, J.D. (1979) A survey of the Lepidoptera, biogeography and ecology of New Caledonia. The Hague: W. Junk.Google Scholar
  13. Holloway, J.D. (1984) Moths as indicator organisms for categorising rain-forest and monitoring changes and regeneration processes. In Tropical Rain-Forest. The Leeds Symposium(A.C. Chadwick and S.L. Sutton, eds) pp. 235–42. Special Publication of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society.Google Scholar
  14. Holloway, J.D. (1994) The relative vulnerabilities of moth higher taxa to habitat change in Borneo. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation(P.I. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds) pp. 197–205. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Holloway, J.D. and Stork, N.E. (1991) The dimensions of biodiversity: the use of invertebrates as indicators of man’s impact. In The biodiversity of microorganisms and invertebrates: its role in sustainable agriculture(D.L. Hawksworth, ed.) pp. 137–62. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  16. Kremen, C. (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecol. Appl. 2, 203–17.Google Scholar
  17. Kremen, C. (1994) Biological inventory using target taxa: a case study of the butterflies of Madagascar. Ecol. Appl. 4, 407–22.Google Scholar
  18. Kudrna, O. (1986) Butterflies of Europe. 8. Aspects of the Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Weisbaden: Aula-Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Launer, A.E. and Murphy, D.D. (1994) Umbrella species and the conservation of habitat fragments: a case of a threatened butterfly and a vanishing grassland ecosystem. Biol. Conserv. 69, 145–53.Google Scholar
  20. Mattoni, R.H.T. (1993) The Palos Verdes Blue, Glaucopsyche lygdamus palosverdesensisPerkins and Emmel. In Conservation Biology of Lycaenidae(T.R. New, ed.) pp. 135–6. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  21. McQuillan, P.B. (1986) Trans-Tasman relationships in the highland moth (Lepidoptera) fauna. In Flora and Fauna of alpine Australasia ages and origins(B.A. Barlow, ed.) pp. 265–76. Australia: CSIRO/Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  22. Murphy, D.D. and Wilcox, B.A. (1986) Butterfly diversity in natural habitat fragments: a test of the validity of vertebrate-based management. In Wildlife 2000, Modelling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates(J. Verner, M. Morrison and C.J. Ralph, eds) pp. 287–92. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nelson, S.M. and Andersen, D.C. (1994) An assessment of riparian environmental quality by using butterflies and disturbance susceptibility scores. Southw. Nat. 39, 137–42.Google Scholar
  24. New, T.R., Britton, D.R., Hinkley, S.D. and Miller, L.J. (1996) The ant fauna of Mount Piper and its relevance to environmental assessment and the conservation of a threatened invertebrate community. Flora & Fauna Technical ReportNo.143, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria.Google Scholar
  25. Neyland, M. (1993) The ecology and conservation management of the ptunarra brown butterfly Oreixenica ptunarra (Lepidoptera; Nymphalidae; Satyrinae) in Tasmania, Australia. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 127, 43–8.Google Scholar
  26. Packer, L. (1991) The status of two butterflies, Karner Blue (Lycaeides melissa samuelis) and Frosted Elfin (Incisalia irus), restricted to oak savannah in Ontario. In Conserving Carolinian Canada(G.W. Allen, P.F.J. Eagles and S.W. Price, eds) pp. 327–31. Ontario: University of Waterloo Press.Google Scholar
  27. Parsons, M.J. (1984) The biology and conservation of Ornithoptera alexandrae. In The Biology of Butterflies (P.R. Ackery and R.I. Vane-Wright, eds) pp. 327–31. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Parsons, M.J. (1992) The world’s largest butterfly endangered: the ecology, status and conservation of Ornithoptera alexandrae(Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Trop. Lepidoptera 3, Supplement 1, 33–60.Google Scholar
  29. Robinson, G.S. and Tuck, K.R. (1993) Diversity and faunistics of small moths (Microlepidoptera) in Bornean rainforest. Ecol. Entomol. 18, 385–93.Google Scholar
  30. Samways, M.J. (1994) Insect Conservation Biology. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Scoble, M.J. (1992) The Lepidoptera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Usher, M.B. (1986) Wildlife Conservation Evaluation. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Young, A.M. (1982) Population Biology of Tropical Insects. New York & London: Plenum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • T.R. New

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations