Transgenic Research

, Volume 6, Issue 5, pp 321–328 | Cite as

The chromosome make-up of mouse embryonic stem cells is predictive of somatic and germ cell chimaerism

  • LETIZIA Longo
  • ANNE Bygrave
  • FRANK G. Grosveld
  • PIER PAOLO Pandolfi


Mouse pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells, once reintroduced into a mouse blastocyst, can contribute to the formation of all tissues, including the germline, of an organism referred to as a chimaeric. However, the reasons why this contribution often appears erratic are poorly understood. We have tested the notion that the chromosome make-up may be important in contributing both to somatic cell chimaerism and to germ line transmission. We found that the percentage of chimaerism of ES cell-embryo chimaeras, the absolute number of chimaeras and the ratio of chimaeras to total pups born all correlate closely with the percentage of euploid metaphases in the ES cell clones injected into the murine blastocyst. The majority of the ES cell clones that we tested, which were obtained from different gene targeting knockout experiments and harboured 50 to 100% euploid metaphases, did transmit to the germline; in contrast, none of the ES cell clones with more than 50% of chromosomally abnormal metaphases transmitted to the germline. Euploid ES cell clones cultured in vitro for more than 20 passages rapidly became severely aneuploid, and again this correlated closely with the percentage of chimaerism and with the number of ES cell--embryo chimaeras obtained per number of blastocysts injected. At the same time, the ability of these clones to contribute to the germline was lost when the proportion of euploid cells dropped below 50%. This study suggests that aneuploidy, rather than ‘loss of totipotency’, in ES cells, is the major cause of failure in obtaining contributions to all tissues of the adult chimaera, including the germline. Because euploidy is predictive of germline transmission, karyotype analysis is crucial and time/cost saving in any gene-targeting experiment

karyotype mouse ES cells 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bradley, A. (1987) Production and analysis of chimaeric mice. In Robertson E.J. ed., Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: a Practical Approach, Oxford, UK: IRL Press Ltd, pp. 113–151.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, A., Evans, M., Kaufman, M.H., Robertson, E. (1984) Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature 309, 255–6.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, D.G., Willington, M.A., Findlay, I., Muggleton-Harris, L. (1992) Criteria that optimize the potential of murine embryonic stem cells for in vitro and in vivo development studies. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 28A, 773–8.Google Scholar
  4. Capecchi, M.R. (1989) The new mouse genetics: altering the genome by gene targeting. Trends Genet 5, 70–6.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, M.J. and Kaufman, M.H. (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotent cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–6.Google Scholar
  6. Gossler, A., Doetschman, T., Korn, R., Serfling, E., Kemler, R. (1986) Transgenesis by means of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 9065–9.Google Scholar
  7. Hasty, P. and Bradley, A. (1993) Gene targeting vectors for mammalian cells. In Joyner, A. L. ed., Gene Targeting: a Practical Approach, Oxford, UK: IRL Press Ltd. pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  8. Hilton, D.J., Nicola, N.A., Metcalf, D. (1988) Specific binding of murine leukemia inhibitory factor to normal and leukemic monocytic cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 5971–5.Google Scholar
  9. Laird, P.W., Zijderveld, A., Linders, K., Rudnicki, M.A., Jaenisch, R. and Berns, A. (1991) Simplified mammalian DNA isolation procedure. Nucl. Acids Res. 19, 4293.Google Scholar
  10. Mansour, S.L., Thomas, K.R. and Capecchi, M.R. (1988) Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes. Nature 336, 348–52.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, G.R. (1981) Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 7634–8.Google Scholar
  12. McMahon, A.P. and Bradley, A. (1990) The Wnt-1 (int-1) proto-oncogene is required for development of a large region of the mouse brain. Cell 62, 1073–85.Google Scholar
  13. Nagy, A., Rossant, J., Nagy, R., Abramov-Newerly, W. and Roder, J.C. (1993) Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8424–8.Google Scholar
  14. Pandolfi, P.P., Roth, M.E., Karis, A., Leonard, M.W., Dzierzak, E., Grosveld, F.G., Engel, J.D., and Lindenbaum, M.H. (1995a) Targeted disruption of the GATA3 gene causes severe abnormalities in the nervous system and in fetal liver haematopoiesis. Nature Genetics 11, 40–4.Google Scholar
  15. Pandolfi, P.P., Sonati, F., Rivi, R., Mason, P., Grosveld, F.G. and Luzzatto, L. (1995b) Targeted disruption of the housekeeping gene encoding glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD): G6PD is dispensable for pentose synthesis but essential for defense against oxidative stress. EMBO J. 14, 5209–15.Google Scholar
  16. Robertson, E.J. (1987) Embryo-derived stem cell lines. In Robertson, E.J. ed., Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: a Practical Approach, Oxford, UK: IRL Press Ltd. pp. 71–112.Google Scholar
  17. Robertson, E.J., Bradley, A., Kuehn, M. and Evans, M. (1986) Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector. Nature 323, 445–8.Google Scholar
  18. Rudnicki, M.A. and McBurney, M.W. (1987) Cell culture methods and induction of differentation of embryonic carcinoma cell lines. In Robertson, E.J. ed., Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: a Practical Approach, Oxford, UK: IRL Press Ltd. pp. 19–49.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, A. and Bruton, J. (1977) Histological Staining Techniques. Chicago, USA: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Smithies, O. (1993) Animal models of human genetic disease. Trends Genet. 9, 112–6.Google Scholar
  21. Swiatek, P.J. and Gridley, T. (1993) Perinatal lethality and defects in hindbrain development in mice homozygous for a targeted mutation of the zinc finger gene Krox20. Genes Dev. 7, 2071–84.Google Scholar
  22. te Riele, H., Maandag, E.R. and Berns, A. (1992) Highly efficient gene targeting in embryonic stem cells through homologous recombination with isogenic DNA constructs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5128–32.Google Scholar
  23. Thomas, K.R. and Capecchi, M.R. (1987) Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 51, 503–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • LETIZIA Longo
    • 1
  • ANNE Bygrave
    • 3
  • FRANK G. Grosveld
    • 4
  • PIER PAOLO Pandolfi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of HaematologyRoyal Postgraduate Medical SchoolLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Human Genetics, Molecular and Cell Biology ProgramsMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.National Institute for Medical ResearchLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Faculty of MedicineErasmus UniversityRotterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations