Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 443–462

The evolution of diadromy in fishes (revisited) and its place in phylogenetic analysis

  • R.M. McDowall
Article

Abstract

Diadromy is a term used to describe migrations of fishes between fresh waters and the sea; these migrations are regular, physiologically mediated movements which occur at predictable life history phases in each diadromous species, they involve most members of a species' populations, and they are usually obligatory. Around 250 fish species are regarded as diadromous. A review of the life history strategies amongst families of fishes that include diadromous species provides little support for a suggested scenario for their evolution that involves: (1) evolution of anadromy via amphidromy from fishes of marine origins, and (2) evolution of catadromy through amphidromy from fishes of freshwater origins, even though these scenarios seem intuitively reasonable. The various forms of diadromy appear to have had multiple independent origins amongst diverse fish groups. There is increasing confidence that behavioural characteristics of animals are heuristic in gener ating and interpreting phylogenies. However, examination of fishes shows wide variability of diadromous life histories within closely related families and genera, within species, and there is even ontogenetic variation in patterns of behaviour by individual fish. In addition, there is multiple loss of diadromy in many diadromous fish species in which the life history becomes restricted to fresh waters. This variation suggests that diadromy is a behavioural character of dubious worth in determining phylogenetic relationships. Moreover, it appears to have been an ancestral condition in some fish families, such as Anguillidae, Salmonidae, Galaxiidae, Osmeridae, and others, and perhaps in the whole salmonoid/osmeroid/galaxioid complex of families. This, too, makes diadromy of dubious worth in phylogenetic analysis

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthington, A.H. (1992) Diets and trophic guild structure of freshwater fishes in Brisbane streams. Proc. R. Soc. Queensland 102, 31-47.Google Scholar
  2. Balon, E.K. (1975) Reproductive guilds of fishes: a proposal and definition. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 32, 821-864.Google Scholar
  3. Balon, E.K. (1981) Additions and amendments to the classification of reproduction styles in fishes. Env. Biol. Fishes 6, 377-389.Google Scholar
  4. Balon, E.K. and Bruton, M.N. (1994) Fishes of the Tatinga River, Comoros, with comments on freshwater amphidromy in the goby Sicyopterus lagocephalus. Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwat. 5, 25-40.Google Scholar
  5. Begle, D.P. (1991) Relationships of the osmeroid fishes and the use of reductive characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Zool. 40, 33-53.Google Scholar
  6. Burgner, R.L. (1991) Life history of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). In Groot, C. and Margolis, L., eds. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 1-117.Google Scholar
  7. Dobson, F.S. (1985) The use of phylogeny in behaviour and ecology. Evolution 39, 1384-1388.Google Scholar
  8. Fink, W.L. (1984) Basal euteleosts: relationships. Am. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpetol. Spec. Publ. 1, 202-206.Google Scholar
  9. Fink, W.L. and Weitzman, S.H. (1982) Relationships of stomiiform fishes (Teleostei), with a description of Diplophos. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. Univ. 150, 31-93.Google Scholar
  10. Fontaine, M. (1975) Physiological mechanisms in the migrations of marine and amphihaline fish. Adv. Mar. Biol. 13, 241-335.Google Scholar
  11. Foster, N.R. (1969) Factors in the origins of fish migrations. Underwater Nat. 6, 27-31, 48.Google Scholar
  12. Gross, M.R. (1987) The evolution of diadromy in fishes. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 1, 14-25.Google Scholar
  13. Healey, M.C. (1991) Life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha). In Groot, C. and Margolis, L, eds. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 311-393.Google Scholar
  14. Heard, W.R. (1991) Life history of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). In Groot, C. and Margolis, L., eds. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 119-230.Google Scholar
  15. Helle, J.H. (1970) Biological characteristics of intertidal and fresh-water spawning pink salmon at Olsen Creek, Prince William Sound, Alaska, 1962-63. U.S. Dep. Int. Fish Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. No. 602. 1-19.Google Scholar
  16. Hennig, W. (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois. 263 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Hoar, W.S. (1976) Smolt transformation: evolution, behaviour and physiology. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33, 1233-1252.Google Scholar
  18. Hughes, J.M., Bunn, S.E., Kingston, D.M. and Hurwood, D.A. (1995) Genetic differentiation and dispersal among populations of Paratya australiensis (Atyidae) in rainforest streams in southeast Queensland, Australia. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 14, 158-173.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, G.D. and Patterson, C. (1996) Relationships of lower euteleostean fishes. In Stiassny, M.J.L., Parenti, L.R. and Johnson, G.D., eds. Interrelationships of Fishes, 2nd edn. New York: Academic Press, pp 251-332.Google Scholar
  20. Kakimoto, H. and Hayashi, K.I. (1995) Experiments on fishways for freshwater amphidromous shrimps. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 61, 171-178.Google Scholar
  21. Kato, F. (1991) Life histories of masu and amago salmon (Oncorhynchus masou and Oncorhynchus rhodurus). In Groot, C. and Margolis, L., eds. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 447-520.Google Scholar
  22. Kinzie, R.A. (1991) Hawaiian freshwater ichthyofauna. In New Directions in Research, Management and Conservation of Hawaiian Freshwater Stream Ecosystems: Proceedings of the 1990 Symposium on Freshwater Stream Biology and Fisheries Management. Honolulu: Division of Aquatic Resources, Department of Land and Natural Resources, pp. 18-39.Google Scholar
  23. McAllister, D.E. (1963) A revision of the smelt family Osmeridae. Nat. Mus. Can. Bull. 191, 1-53.Google Scholar
  24. McDowall, R.M. (1968) The application of the terms anadromous and catadromous to the southern hemisphere salmonoid fishes. Copeia 1968, 176-178.Google Scholar
  25. McDowall, R.M. (1969) Relationships of galaxioid fishes, with a further discussion of salmoniform classification. Copeia 1969, 796-824.Google Scholar
  26. McDowall, R.M. (1979) Fishes of the family Retropinnidae (Pisces: Salmoniformes)-a taxonomic revision and synopsis. J. R. Soc. N.Z. 9, 85-121.Google Scholar
  27. McDowall, R.M. (1988) Diadromy in Fishes: Migrations between Freshwater and Marine Environments. London: Croom Helm. 308 pp.Google Scholar
  28. McDowall, R.M. (1990) New Zealand Freshwater Fishes: a Natural History and Guide. Auckland: Heinemann Reed. 553 pp.Google Scholar
  29. McDowall, R.M. (1992) Diadromy: origins and definitions of terminology. Copeia 1992, 248-251.Google Scholar
  30. McDowall, R.M. (1993) A recent marine ancestry for diadromous fishes? Sometimes yes, but mostly no. Env. Biol. Fishes 37, 329-335.Google Scholar
  31. McDowall, R.M. (1994) Distinctive form and colouration of juvenile torrentfish Cheimarrichthys fosteri (Pisces: Pinguipedidae). N.Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 28, 385-390.Google Scholar
  32. McDowall, R.M. (1997) Is there such a thing as amphidromy? Micronesica 30, 3-14.Google Scholar
  33. McLennan, D.A. (1991) Integrating phylogeny and experimental ethology: from pattern to process. Evolution 45, 1773-1789.Google Scholar
  34. McLennan, D.A. (1994) A phylogenetic approach to the evolution of fish behaviour. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 4, 430-460.Google Scholar
  35. McLennan, D.A., Brooks, D.R. and McPhail, J.D. (1988) The benefits of communication between comparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: a case study using gasterosteid fishes. Can. J. Zool. 66, 2177-2190.Google Scholar
  36. Mayden, R.L. and Wiley, E.O. (1992) The fundamentals of phylogenetic systematics. In Mayden, R.L., ed. Systematics, Historical Ecology and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 114-185.Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell, C.P. (1994) Whitebait spawning ground management. Department of Conservation Science and Research Series (New Zealand) 69, 1-23.Google Scholar
  38. Morrow, J.E. (1980) The Freshwater Fishes of Alaska. Anchorage: Alaska Northwest Publishing. 248 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Myers, G.S. (1949) Usage of anadromous, catadromous and allied terms for migratory fishes. Copeia 1949, 89-97.Google Scholar
  40. Nelson, J.S. (1994) Fishes of the World, 3rd edn. New York: Wiley. 600 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Nordeng, H. (1983) Solution to the 'char problem' based on Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) in Norway. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 40, 1372-1387.Google Scholar
  42. Northcote, T.G. (1967) The relation of movements and migrations to production in freshwater fish. In Gerking, S.D., ed. The Biological Basis of Freshwater Fish Production. New York: Wiley, pp. 315-344.Google Scholar
  43. Northcote, T.G. (1992) Migration and residency in stream salmonids-some ecological considerations and evolutionary consequences. Nord. J. Freshwat. Res. 67, 5-17.Google Scholar
  44. Northcote, T.G. and Ward, F.J. (1985) Lake resident and migratory smelt Retropinna retropinna (Richardson), of the lower Waikato River system. N.Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 17, 113-129.Google Scholar
  45. Parenti, L.R. and Maciolek, J.A. (1993) New sicydiine gobies from Ponape and Palau, Micronesia, with comments on the systematics of the subfamily Sicydiinae (Teleostei: Gobiidae). Bull. Mar. Sci. 53, 945-972.Google Scholar
  46. Paterson, A.M., Wallis, G.P. and Gray, R.D. (1995) Penguins, petrels and parsimony: does cladistic analysis of behaviour reflect seabird phylogeny. Evolution 49, 974-989.Google Scholar
  47. de Queiroz, A. and Wimberger, P.H. (1993) The usefulness of behaviour for phylogeny estimations: levels of homoplasy in behavioural and morphological characteristics. Evolution 47, 46-60.Google Scholar
  48. Quinn, T.P., Hendry, A.P. and Wetzle, L.A. (1995) The influence of life history trade-offs and the size of incubation gravels on egg size variation in sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Oikos 74, 425-438.Google Scholar
  49. Radtke, R.L. and Kinzie, R.A. (1991) Hawaiian amphidromous gobies: perspectives on recruitment processes and life history events. In New Directions in Research, Management and Conservation of Hawaiian Freshwater Stream Ecosystems: Proceedings of the 1990 Symposium on Freshwater Stream Biology and Fisheries Management. Honolulu: Division of Aquatic Resources, Department of Land and Natural Resources, pp. 125-141.Google Scholar
  50. Regan, C.T. (1911) The Freshwater Fishes of the British Isles. London: Methuen. 287 pp.Google Scholar
  51. Resh, V.H., Barnes, J.R. and Craig, D.A. (1990) Distribution and ecology of benthic macroinvertebrates in the Opunoho River catchment, Moorea, French Polynesia. Ann. Limnol. 26, 195-214.Google Scholar
  52. Rosen, D.E. (1974) Phylogeny and zoogeography of salmoniform fishes and relationships of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 153, 265-326.Google Scholar
  53. Rounsefell, G.A. (1958) Anadromy in North American Salmonidae. Fish Bull. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. 62, 171-185.Google Scholar
  54. Salo, E.O. (1991) Life history of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta). In Groot, C. and Margolis, L., eds. Pacific Salmon Life Histories. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 231-309.Google Scholar
  55. Schneider, D.W. and Lyons, J. (1993) Dynamics of upstream migration in two species of tropical freshwater snails. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 12, 3-16.Google Scholar
  56. Scott, W.B. and Crossman, E.J. (1973) Freshwater fishes of Canada. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 184, 1-996.Google Scholar
  57. Stearley, R.L. (1992) Historical ecology of Salmoninae, with special reference to Oncorhynchus. In Mayden, R.L., ed. Systematics, Historical Ecology and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 622-658.Google Scholar
  58. Svenning, M.A., Smith-Nilsen, A. and Jobling, M. (1992) Sea water migration of Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus L.)-correlations between freshwater growth and seaward migration based on back-calculations from otoliths. Nord. J. Freshwat. Res. 67, 18-26.Google Scholar
  59. Taylor, M. (1996) How native fish spawn on land. Water and Atmosphere 4(3), 23-25.Google Scholar
  60. Tchernavin, V. (1939) The origin of salmon-is its ancestry marine or fresh water? Salm. Trout Mag. 95, 120-140.Google Scholar
  61. Thorpe, J.E. (1982) Migration in salmonids with special reference to juvenile movements in fresh water. In Brannon, E.S. and Salo, E.O., eds. Proceedings of the Salmon and Trout Migratory Behaviour Symposium. Seattle: School of Fisheries, University of Washington, pp. 86-97.Google Scholar
  62. Thorpe, J.E. (1987) Smolting versus residency: development conflicts in salmonids. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 1, 224-252.Google Scholar
  63. Tinbergen, N. (1953) Social Behaviour in Animals: with Special Reference to Vertebrates. London: Methuen. 228 pp.Google Scholar
  64. Tinbergen, N. (1959) Behaviour, systematics and natural selection. Ibis 101, 318-330.Google Scholar
  65. Tinbergen, N. (1964) On aims and methods of ethology. Zeit. Tierpsych. 20, 410-433.Google Scholar
  66. Wiley, E.O. (1981) Phylogenetics: the Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: Wiley. 419 pp.Google Scholar
  67. Williams, W.D. and Smith, M.J. (1979) A taxonomic revision of the Australian species of Paratya (Crustacea: Atyidae). Aust. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 30, 815-832.Google Scholar
  68. Wootton, R.J. (1976) The Biology of the Sticklebacks. London: Academic Press. 387 pp.Google Scholar
  69. Wootton, R.J. (1984) A Functional Biology of Sticklebacks. London: Croom Helm. 265 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • R.M. McDowall
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations