Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 99, Issue 3–4, pp 357–376 | Cite as

Rethinking the partisan effects of higher turnout: So what's the question?

  • Bernard Grofman
  • Guillermo Owen
  • Christian Collet
Article

Abstract

Controversy persists over the link between turnout and the likelihood of success of Democratic candidates (e.g., DeNardo, 1980, 1986; Zimmer, 1985; Tucker and Vedlitz, 1986; Piven and Cloward, 1988; Texeira, 1992; Radcliff, 1994, 1995; Erikson, 1995a, b). We argue that the authors in this debate have largely been talking past one another because of a failure to distinguish three quite different questions. The first question is: “Are low turnout voters more likely to vote Democratic than high turnout voters?” The second question is: “Should we expect that elections in which turnout is higher are ones in which we can expect Democrats to have done better?” The third question is the counterfactual: “If turnout were to have increased in some given election, would Democrats have done better?” We show the logical independence of the first two questions from one another and from the third, and argue that previous researchers have failed to recognize this logical independence – sometimes thinking they were answering question three when in fact they were answering either question one or question two. Reviewing previous research, we find that the answer to the first question once was YES but, for more recent elections at the presidential level, now appears to be NO, while, for congressional and legislative elections, the answer to the second question appears generally to be NO. However, the third question is essentially unanswerable absent an explicit model of why and how turnout can be expected to increase, and/or analyses of individual level panel data. Thus, the cross-sectional and pooled data analyses of previous research are of almost no value in addressing this third question.

Keywords

Panel Data Public Finance Pool Data Previous Researcher Explicit Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alt, J. (1994). The impact of the Voting Rights Act on black and white voter registration in the South. In C. Davidson and B. Grofman (Eds.), Quiet revolution in the South: The impact of the Voting Rights Act, 1965–1990, 351–377. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, S.E. and Resnick, D. (1990). The implications for nonvoting for democracy in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 34: 771–802.Google Scholar
  3. Brians, C. and Grofman, B. (1999). When registration barriers fall, who votes?: An empirical test of a rational choice model. Public Choice 99: 161–176.Google Scholar
  4. Burnham, W.D. (1965). The changing shape of the American political universe. American Political Science Review 59: 7–28.Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, W.D. (1982). The current crisis in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Calvert, J.W. (1996). The National Voter Registration Act: Will it make a difference? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California, 29 August–1 September.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, G. (1988).Closeness and turnout:Amethodological note. Journal of Politics 50: 768–775.Google Scholar
  9. Cox, G. and Munger, M. (1989). Contributions, expenditures, turnout: The 1982 U.S. House Elections. American Political Science Review 83: 217–231.Google Scholar
  10. DeNardo, J. (1980). Turnout and the vote: The joke is on the Democrats. American Political Science Review 74: 406–420.Google Scholar
  11. DeNardo, J. (1986). Does heavy turnout help Democrats in presidential elections? American Political Science Review 80: 1298–1304.Google Scholar
  12. Erikson, R.S. (1995a). State turnout and presidential voting. American Politics Quarterly 23: 387–396.Google Scholar
  13. Erikson, R.S. (1995b). Pooling and statistical control: A reply to Radcliff. American Politics Quarterly 23: 404–408.Google Scholar
  14. Fenton, J.H. (1979). Turnout and the twoparty vote. Journal of Politics 41: 229–234.Google Scholar
  15. Gant, M.M. and Lyons W. (1993). Democratic theory, nonvoting, and public policy – the 1972–1988 presidential elections. American Politics Quarterly April: 22.Google Scholar
  16. Glazer, A. and Grofman, B. (1992). A positive relationship between turnout and plurality does not refute the rational voter model. Quality and Quantity 26: 85–93.Google Scholar
  17. Grofman, B. (1996). Downsian political economy. In R. Goodin and H.D. Klingemann (Eds.), New handbook of political science. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Grofman, B., Collet, C. and Griffin, R. (1995). Do Democrats do better in higher turnout elections? Prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, Long Beach, California, 24–26 March.Google Scholar
  19. Grofman, B., Collet, C. and Griffin, R. (1999). Analyzing the turnoutcompetitiveness link with aggregate data. Public Choice, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  20. Hanks, C. and Grofman, B. (1999). Turnout in gubernatorial and senatorial primary and general elections in the South, 1922–90: A rational choice model of the effects of shortrun and longrun electoral competition on turnout. Public Choice, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, K.Q. and Leighley, J.E. (1996). Political parties and class mobilization in contemporary United States elections. American Journal of Political Science 40: 787–804.Google Scholar
  22. Key, V.O. (1958). Politics, parties and pressure groups, 4th ed. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.Google Scholar
  23. Knack, S. (1997). The reappearing American voter: Why did turnout rise in '92? Electoral Studies 16: 17–32.Google Scholar
  24. Leighley, J.E. and Nagler, J. (1992). Socioeconomic class bias in turnout, 1964–1988: The voters remain the same. American Political Science Review 86: 725–736.Google Scholar
  25. Miller, A. and Wattenberg, M.P. (1982). Turnout and the vote: Commonsense makes good sense. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  26. Pacek, A. and Radcliff, B. (1995). Turnout and the vote for LeftofCentre parties: A crossnational analysis. British Journal of Political Science 25: 137–143.Google Scholar
  27. Piven, F.F. and Cloward, R.A. (1988). Why Americans don't vote. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  28. Powell, G.B. (1980). Voting turnout in thirty democracies: Partisan, legal and socioeconomic influences. In R. Rose (Ed.), Electoral participation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Radcliff, B. (1994). Turnout and the Democratic vote. American Politics Quarterly 22: 259–276.Google Scholar
  30. Radcliff, B. (1995). Turnout and the vote revisited: A reply to Erikson. American Politics Quarterly 23: 397–403.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenstone, S.J. and Wolfinger, R.E. (1978). The effects of registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review 72: 22–45.Google Scholar
  32. Shields, T.G. and Goidel, R.K. (1997). Participation rates, socioeconomic class biases and congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science 41: 683–691.Google Scholar
  33. Texeira, R. (1992). The disappearing American voter. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  34. Tucker, H.J. and Vedlitz, A. (1986). Does heavy turnout help Democrats in presidential elections? American Political Science Review 80: 1291–1298.Google Scholar
  35. Verba, S. and Nie, N.H. (1972). Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H.E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wolfinger, R.E. and Rosenstone, S.J. (1980). Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wolfinger, R.E., Rosenstone, S.J. and McIntosh, R.A. (1981). Presidential and congressional voters compared. American Politics Quarterly 9: 245–256.Google Scholar
  39. Zimmer, T.A. (1985). Political competition, voter turnout and party vote. Social Science Journal 22: 103–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Grofman
    • 1
  • Guillermo Owen
    • 2
  • Christian Collet
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Social Sciences, University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsNaval Post-Graduate SchoolMonterey, sCA
  3. 3.School of Social Sciences, University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations