Euphytica

, Volume 100, Issue 1–3, pp 189–196

Cytoplasmic effects on quality traits of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

  • H. Ekiz
  • A. Safi Kiral
  • A. Akçin
  • L. Simsek
Article

Abstract

The inheritances of thousand kernel weight (TKW), protein percentage, protein quality and grain hardness were studied through an 11 x 11 complete diallel set of bread wheat genotypes consisting of four alloplasmic lines of Selkirk, two alloplasmic lines of Siete Cerros 66, and five commercial cultivars. Genetic components accounted for 93%, 90%, 78%, and 92% of total variation for TKW, protein percentage, protein quality, and grain hardness, respectively. General combining ability (GCA) effects were dominant for TKW (48% GCA, 38% SCA [specific combining ability], and 7% reciprocal effects [RE]), protein percentage (70% GCA, 10% SCA, and 10% RE), and grain hardness (59% GCA, 29% SCA, and 4% RE). However, SCA effects dominated for protein quality (30% GCA, 43% SCA, and 5% RE). Broad- and narrow-sense heritabilities were estimated at 0.95 and 0.65 for TKW, 0.94 and 0.82 for protein percentage, 0.83 and 0.47 for protein quality, and 0.95 and 0.74 for grain hardness. Reciprocal effects were highly significant for all quality traits, but less effective than additive and non-additive gene effects. Aegilops cylindrica, Ae. ventricosa, and Triticum turgidum cytoplasms showed positive effects on TKW in some crosses. Ae. cylindrica, Ae. variabilis, and Ae. uniaristata cytoplasms seemed to have potential for improving protein percentage. T. aestivum cytoplasms were superior to alien cytoplasms for protein quality. Bolal 2973, Kiraç 66 and Bezostaja 1 cytoplasms increased protein quality in some crosses. Ae. cylindrica, Ae. variabilis, Ae. ventricosa and Ae. uniaristata cytoplasms had significant effects on grain hardness. The cytoplasmic variation in B type T. aestivum cytoplasm was found to be significant for all traits.

cytoplasmic effects inheritance quality Triticum aestivum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aida, Y., M. Muramatsu, T. Fukui & S. Tsubuko, 1981. Malting quality of a barley cultivar with Hordeum bulbosum cytoplasm. Bulletin of Brewing Science 27: 17–21.Google Scholar
  2. Berbec, A, 1994. Variation among offspring of alloplasmic tobacco Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Zamojska 4 with the cytoplasm of N. knightiana Goodspeed. Theor Appl Genet 89: 127–132.Google Scholar
  3. Danon, T. & Z. Eyal, 1990. Inheritance of resistance to two Septoria tritici isolates in spring and winter bread wheat cultivars. Euphytica 47(3): 203–214.Google Scholar
  4. Dhitaphichit, P., P. Jones & E.M. Keane, 1989. Nuclear and cytoplasmic gene control of resistance to loose smut (Ustilago tritici) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 78: 897–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ekiz, H. & C.F. Konzak, 1991a. Nuclear and cytoplasmic control of anther culture response in wheat. I. Analyses of alloplasmic lines. Crop Sci 31(6): 1421–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekiz, H. & C.F. Konzak, 1991b. Nuclear and cytoplasmic control of anther culture response in wheat. III. Common wheat crosses. Crop Sci 31(6): 1432–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ekiz, H. & C.F. Konzak, 1994. Preliminary diallel analysis of anther culture response in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Breeding 113: 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grun, B., 1976. Cytoplasmic Genetics, pp. 279–295. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Jan, C.C., 1992. Cytoplasmic-nuclear gene interaction for plant vigour in Helianthus species. Crop Sci 32: 320–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keane, E.M. & P.W. Jones, 1990. Effect of alien cytoplasm substitution on the response of wheat cultivars to Septoria nodorum. Annals of Applied Biology 117(2): 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinoshita, T., 1988. Utilisation of nucleo-cytoplasmic hybrids with Aegilops ovata cytoplasm in wheat breeding. In: T.E. Miller & R.M.D. Koebner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, pp. 1133–1138. Institute of Plant Science Research, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Konzak, C.F., H. Ekiz, H. Zhou & M.A. Davis, 1991. Nuclear and cytoplasmic control of anther culture response in wheat: Potential of cytoplasm genetic variability. In: T. Sasakuma & T. Kinoshita (Eds.), Nuclear and Organellar Genomes of Wheat, Proceedings of Dr. H. Kihara Memorial International Symposium on Cytoplasmic Engineering in Wheat, pp. 251–266. Kihara Memorial Foundation. Yokohoma, Japan.Google Scholar
  13. Maan, S.S., 1983. Differential nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions involving Aegilops longissima cytoplasm and nuclei of emmer and common wheat. Crop Sci 23: 990–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ogihara, Y. & K. Tsunewaki, 1988. Diversity and evolution of chloroplast DNA in Triticum and Aegilops as revealed by restriction fragment analysis. Theor Appl Genet 76: 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Panayotov, I., T.S. Rachinsca, V. Gotsova & Y. Mukai, 1982. Effect of cytoplasm on protein content and some technological qualities of the grain in bread wheat. Genetika i Selektsiya 15 (6): 415–425.Google Scholar
  16. Parfenova, T.A. & A.N. Palilova, 1989. Changes in the expression of nuclear genes that control gliadin synthesis in the bread wheat variety Penjamo 62 as affected by foreign cytoplasm. Biyalagichnykh Navuk 123(2): 35–39.Google Scholar
  17. Plaha, P. & G.S. Sethi, 1989. Comparative performance of bread wheat and hexaploid triticale cytoplasm. Theor Appl Genet 77: 685–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sagi, L. & B. Barnabas, 1989. Evidence for cytoplasmic control of in vitro microspore embryogenesis in the anther culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 78: 867–872.Google Scholar
  19. Silkova, T.A. & A.N. Palilova, 1986. Influence of foreign cytoplasm on the expression of the nuclear genome in bread wheat variety Penjamo 62. Biyalagichnykh Navuk 5: 25–30.Google Scholar
  20. Singh, R.K. & B.D. Chaudhary, 1979. Diallel analysis. In: Biometrical Methods in Quantiative Genetic Analysis, pp. 102–157. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  21. Sutka, J., A.J. Worland & O.J. Maystrenko, 1991. Slight effect of cytoplasm on frost resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cer Res Com 19: 311–317.Google Scholar
  22. Tsunewaki, K., 1980. Genetic diversity of the cytoplasm in Triticum and Aegilops. In: Jpn Soc Prom Sci, pp. 1–290. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  23. Tsunewaki, K., 1988. Cytoplasmic variation in Triticum and Aegilops. In: T.E. Miller & R.M.D. Koebner (Eds.), Proceedings of 7th International Wheat Genetic Symposium, Vol. 1, pp. 53–62. Institute of Plant Science Research, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Voluevich, E.A. & A.N. Palilova, 1988. Effect of maternal cytoplasm on resistance to brown rust in bread wheat. Tsitologiya i Genetika 22: 34–37.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, P., F.J. Haramein, H. Nakkoul & S. Rihawi, 1986. Crop Quality Evaluation Methods and Guidelines. Technical Manual No: 14, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
  26. Yadav, O.P, 1994. Effects of cytoplasmic source on the combining ability of agronomic traits in pearl millet. Plant Breeding 113: 242–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yasumura, Y., N. Nakata, A. Fukumota & M. Sasaki, 1988. Regulatory effects of chromosomes and cytoplasmic genomes on the gene expression of grain protein in wheat. In: T.E. Miller & R.M.D. Koebner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, pp. 681–686. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  28. Zhang, Y., Y.W. Wu, C.L. Zhang & Y.X. Wang, 1985. Effects of Aegilops squarrosa cytoplasm on the characters of common wheat. Scientica Agriculture Sinica 4: 56–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Ekiz
    • 1
  • A. Safi Kiral
    • 1
  • A. Akçin
    • 2
  • L. Simsek
    • 1
  1. 1.Bahri Dagdaş International Winter Cereals Research CentreKonyaTurkey
  2. 2.Institute of High TechnologyGebzeTurkey

Personalised recommendations