Euphytica

, Volume 100, Issue 1–3, pp 137–145 | Cite as

Wheat breeding for end-product use

  • W. Bushuk

Abstract

High grain yield is the primary objective of most wheat breeding programs around the world. In some countries, for example Australia and Canada, a new wheat cultivar must meet a prescribed level of quality before it can be registered for commercial production. For most traditional uses, wheat quality derives mainly from two interrelated characteristics: grain hardness and protein content. Grain hardness is a heritable trait but it can be strongly affected by abnormal weather conditions such as excessive rainfall during the harvest period. Protein content is weakly heritable and strongly dependent on environmental factors such as available soil nitrogen and moisture during the growing season. In addition, each end-use requires a specific 'quality' in the protein. Quality is determined by the molecular structure of the major proteins of flour which, in turn, controls the interactions of the proteins during the breadmaking process. Durum wheats have the hardest grain texture and are usually high in protein content. They are especially suited to the production of pasta because of their highly vitreous grain (high milling yield of semolina), unique combination of storage proteins for good cooking quality of pasta, and high yellow pigment content required for attractive appearance of cooked product. All three characteristics are highly heritable and can be readily improved by conventional breeding. Recent research has shown that the presence of γ-gliadin 45 is a reliable marker of good cooking quality. This marker is now used for screening early generation material in many durum wheat breeding programs. Common (hexaploid) wheats cover a wide range of grain hardness and protein content. The hardest wheats of this class, generally highest in protein, are used for pan bread. Considerable progress has been achieved in research of the molecular properties of flour proteins that are required for highest bread quality. The key protein component in this regard is glutenin. Segregating breeding populations can be screened by electrophoresis or high performance liquid chromatography for the presence of desirable glutenin subunits. Common wheats of medium hardness and lower protein content are used for other types of bread and noodles. Wheats with softest texture and lowest protein are used for cakes and cookies. In some end-uses, e.g., Chinese-type noodles, starch quality is important together with protein quality; this feature should be taken into consideration in developing a screening strategy for wheats for this application. Screening tests that reflect end-use requirements for most of the known products are available, and should be applied in testing wheats according to intended use.

wheat quality breeding end-product use 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Autran, J.C. & G. Galterio, 1989. Associations between electrophoretic composition of proteins, quality characteristics and agronomic attributes of durum wheats. II. Protein-quality associations. J Cereal Sci 9: 195–215.Google Scholar
  2. Boggini, G., P. Tusa & N.E. Pogna, 1994. Protein composition and breadmaking quality of durum wheat. In: Wheat Kernel Proteins: Molecular and Functional Aspects, pp. 291–293. Universita Degli Studi Della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. Bushuk, W. & D. Leisle, 1988. Nature and inheritance of protein quality in Canadian durum wheat cultivars. In: G. Wittmer (Ed.), The Future of Cereals for Human Feeding and Development of Biotechnological Research, pp. 119–134. Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Handicraft and Agriculture, Foggia, Italy.Google Scholar
  4. Damidaux, R., 1979. Nouveaux critères de sélection pour l'amélioration de la qualité du blé dur. Thesis, Université de Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
  5. Finney, K.F. & M.A. Barmore, 1948. Loaf volume and protein content of hard winter and spring wheats. Cereal Chem 25: 291–312.Google Scholar
  6. Kaltsikes, P.J., L.E. Evans & W. Bushuk, 1968. A durum-type wheat with high breadmaking quality. Science 159: 211–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Khelifi, D. & G. Branlard, 1992. The effects of HMW and LMW subunits of glutenin and of gliadins on the technological quality of the progeny from four crosses between poor breadmaking quality and strong wheat cultivars. J Cereal Sci 16: 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kolster, P., C.F. Krechting & W.M.J. Van Gelder, 1992. Quantification of individual high molecular weight subunits of wheat glutenin using SDS-PAGE and scanning densitometry. J Cereal Sci 15: 49–62.Google Scholar
  9. Kolster, P. & J.W. Vereijken, 1993. Evaluating HMW glutenin subunits to improve bread-making quality of wheat. Cereal Foods World 38: 76–82.Google Scholar
  10. Marchylo, B.D., O.M. Lukow & J.E. Kruger, 1992. Quantitative variation in high molecular weight subunit 7 in some Canadian wheats. J Cereal Sci 15: 29–38.Google Scholar
  11. Matsuo, R.R., 1993. Durum wheat - production and processing. In: Grains and Oilseeds: Handling, Marketing, Processing. pp. 779–807. Canadian International Grains Institute, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Matsuo, R.R., 1994. Durum wheat: Its unique pasta-making properties. In: W. Bushuk & V.F. Rasper (Eds.), Wheat: Production, Properties and Quality, pp. 167–178. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Morgunov, A.I., R.J. Peña, J. Crossa & S. Rajaram, 1993. Worldwide distribution of Glu-1 alleles in bread wheat. J Genet & Breed 47(1): 53–60.Google Scholar
  14. Ng, P.K.W. & W. Bushuk, 1988. Statistical relationships between high molecular weight subunits of glutenin and breadmaking quality of Canadian-grown wheats. Cereal Chem 65: 408–413.Google Scholar
  15. Ng, P.K.W., N.E. Pogna, F. Mellini & W. Bushuk, 1989. Glu-1 allele compositions of the wheat cultivars registered in Canada. J Genet & Breed 43(1): 53–59.Google Scholar
  16. Orth, R.A. & W. Bushuk, 1972. A comparative study of the proteins of wheats of diverse baking qualities. Cereal Chem 49: 268–275.Google Scholar
  17. Payne, P.I., 1987. The genetical basis of breadmaking quality in wheat. Aspects Appl Biol 15: 79–90.Google Scholar
  18. Payne, P.I., K.G. Corfield & J.A. Blackman, 1979. Identification of a high-molecular-weight subunit of glutenin whose presence correlates with breadmaking quality in wheats of related pedigree. Theor Appl Genet 55: 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Payne, P.I., M.A. Nightingale, A.F. Krattiger & L.M. Holt, 1987. The relationship between HMW glutenin subunit composition and the breadmaking quality of British-grown wheat varieties. J Sci Food Agric 40: 51–65.Google Scholar
  20. Suchy, J. & H.D. Sapirstein, 1995. A modification of a SDS-gel test for rapid prediction of bread wheat quality. Cereal Foods World 40: 691–692.Google Scholar
  21. Sutton, K.H., R.L. Hay & W.B. Griffin, 1989. Assessment of the potential bread baking quality of New Zealand wheats by RPHPLC of glutenins. J Cereal Sci 10: 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weegels, P.L., R.J. Hamer & J.D. Schofield, 1996. Functional properties of wheat glutenin (critical review). J Cereal Sci 23: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williams, P.C., 1993. The world of wheat. In: Grains and Oilseeds: Handling, Marketing, Processing, pp. 557–602. Canadian International Grains Institute, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  24. Zillman, R.R., 1978. Wheat Cultivar Identification by Gliadin Electrophoregrams. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Bushuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food ScienceUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations