Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 99, Issue 1–4, pp 43–54 | Cite as

The Freshwater Floc: A Functional Relationship of Water and Organic and Inorganic Floc Constituents Affecting Suspended Sediment Properties

  • I.G. Droppo
  • G.G. Leppard
  • D.T. Flannigan
  • S.N. Liss
Article

Abstract

Flocculated fine-grained sediment is a complex matrix of microbial communities and organic (detritus, cellular debris and extracellular polymers) and inorganic material. Suspended flocs within any aquatic system play a significant ecological role as they can regulate the overall water quality through their physical, chemical and/or biological activity. This paper investigates the complex structural matrix of riverine flocs over a large range of magnifications using correlative microscopic techniques. The significance of floc structural characteristics [(size, shape, porosity, density, inorganic composition, organic composition (bacteria and fibrils)] on the physical (eg. transport and settling), chemical (eg. adsorbing/transforming contaminants and nutrients), and biological (eg. biotransformation and habitat development) behaviour of a floc is investigated. Results suggest that it is the floc's internal structure that has a significant impact on controlling the above floc behaviours. This internal structure is complex and is often dominated by the existence of a three-dimensional matrix of fibrillar material secreted by the active microbial community within the floc. This matrix, in conjunction with the inorganic and bioorganic (active and inactive) constituents of a floc, provides an intricate pore structure that may result in water being an important bound component of a floc. These complex interactive structural and functional properties of a floc are considered to influence a floc's behaviour both physically in how it is transported or settled, chemically in how it adsorbs/transforms contaminants and nutrients, and biologically in how it develops a diverse microhabitat capable of modifying the structural, chemical and biological makeup of the floc.

freshwater floc flocculation bacteria fibrils pores inorganic particles settling size and structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amos C.L. and Droppo, I.G.: 1996, 'The stability of remediated lake bed sediment, Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario, Canada'. Geological Survey of Canada Open File Report # 2276.Google Scholar
  2. Burban, P.-Y, Xu, Y.-J. McNeil, J. and Lick, W.: 1990, J. Geophys. Res. 95(C10), 18213–18220.Google Scholar
  3. Costorton, J.W., Cheng, K.-L., Geescy, G.G.: Ladd, T., Nickel, J.C., Dasgupta, M., and Marrie, T.J.: 1987, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 435–464.Google Scholar
  4. Decho, A.W.: 1990, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 28, 73–153.Google Scholar
  5. Droppo, I.G. and Ongley, E.D.: 1992, Wat. Res. 26, 65–72.Google Scholar
  6. Droppo, I.G. and Ongley, E.D.: 1994, Wat. Res. 28(8): 1799–1809.Google Scholar
  7. Droppo, I.G. and Jaskot, C.: 1995, Environ. Sci. Technol 29, 161–170.Google Scholar
  8. Droppo, I.G., Flannigan, D.T., Leppard, G.G., Jaskot, C. and Liss, S.N.: 1996, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 3508–3515.Google Scholar
  9. Fennessy, M.J., Dyer, K.R. and Huntley, D.A.: 1994, Mar. Geol. 117, 107–117.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbs, R.J.: 1985, J. Geophys. Res. 90(C2), 3249–3251.Google Scholar
  11. Hawley, N.: 1982, J. Geophys. Res. 87(C12), 9489–9498.Google Scholar
  12. Heissenberger, A., Leppard, G.G. and Herndl, G.J.: 1996, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 135, 299–308.Google Scholar
  13. Leppard, G.G.: 1985, Water Pollut. Res. J. Can. 20(2), 100–110.Google Scholar
  14. Leppard, G.G.: 1992, Analyst 117, 595–603.Google Scholar
  15. Leppard, G.G.: 1993, 'Organic flocs in surface waters: their native state and aggregation behavior in relation to contaminant dispersion', in S.S. Rao (ed.), Particulate Matter and Aquatic Contaminants Lewis Publ., Chelsea, MI, pp. 169–195.Google Scholar
  16. Leppard, G.G.: 1995, Sci. Total Environ. 165, 103–131.Google Scholar
  17. Li, D.-H and Ganczarczyk, J.: 1986, Water Poll. Res. J. Can 21, 130–149.Google Scholar
  18. Li, D.-H and Ganczarczyk, J.: 1987, Wat. Res. 21, 257–262.Google Scholar
  19. Li, D.-H and Ganczarczyk, J.: 1988, Wat. Res. 22, 789–792.Google Scholar
  20. Liss, S.N., Droppo, I.D., Flannigan, D.T. and Leppard, G.G.: 1996, Environ. Sci. Technol 30, 680–686.Google Scholar
  21. Logan, B.E. and Hunt, J.R.: 1987, Limnol. Oceanogr. 32, 1034–1048.Google Scholar
  22. Logan, B.E. and Hunt, J.R.: 1988, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 31, 91–101.Google Scholar
  23. Ongley, E.D.: 1974, 'Hydrophysical characteristics of Great Lakes tributary drainage, Canada*#x2019;. Pollution and Land Use Activities Reference Group (PLUARG), International Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  24. Sherman, I.: 1953, Trans. AGU., 34, 394–406.Google Scholar
  25. Skafel, M.G. and Krishnappan, B.G. 1995. 'Deposition of fine-grained sediment under wave action', in Proceedings of the 1995 Canadian Coastal Conference Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada, pp. 767.Google Scholar
  26. Tambo, N. and Watanabe, Y.: 1979, Wat. Res. 13, 409–419.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • I.G. Droppo
    • 1
    • 2
  • G.G. Leppard
    • 1
    • 3
  • D.T. Flannigan
    • 3
  • S.N. Liss
    • 4
  1. 1.National Water Research InstituteBurlingtonCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  3. 3.Department of BiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Applied Chemical and Biological SciencesRyerson Polytechnic UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations