Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 6, Issue 7, pp 903–913

Effect of a highway on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) species composition and abundance, with a recommendation for roadside verge width

  • M. J. Samways
  • R. Osborn
  • F. Carliel
Article

Abstract

Species composition and relative abundances of ground-dwelling ants at various distances from a major urban highway in South Africa were sampled using pitfall trapping. Diversity, richness and evenness indices indicated differences between ant assemblages, with samples near to the highway (<4 m) having the highest species diversity, and farthest ones (32 m) having the lowest. As measured environmental variables did not explain much of the variation in the species spatial pattern, it appears that the ants were influenced mostly by interspecific competition and/or distribution of food resources, especially road kills. Pheidole megacephala was highly dominant at all sites and was negatively associated with several other species. This and other dominant species appeared to be influencing the abundance of the rarer ones. Dominance and high abundances of species in the genera Pheidole, Monomorium, Tetramorium and Paratrechina, along with the occurrence of certain grasses, indicated that the whole sampling area was disturbed. In a suburban setting, a narrow roadside verge (<4m) is probably adequate. However, for maximum diversity in rural areas, roadsides should be as wide as possible and also rich and heterogenous in native vegetation.

ants dominance disturbance highway verge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, A.N. (1988) Immediate and longer-term effects of fire on seed predation by ants in sclerophyllous vegetation in south-eastern Australia. Aust. J. Ecol. 13, 285–93.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, A.N. (1990) The use of ant communities to evaluate change in Australian terrestrial ecosystems: a review and a recipe. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 76, 347–57.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, A.N. (1991) Sampling communities of ground foraging ants: pitfall catches compared with quadrat-counts in an Australian tropical savanna. Aust. J. Ecol. 16, 273–9.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, A.N. (1993) Ants as indicators of restoration success at a uranium mine in tropical Australia. Restor. Ecol. 1 (Sep. 93), 156–67.Google Scholar
  5. Broekhuysen, G.J. (1940) The brown house ant (Pheidole megacephala Fabr.). Department of Agriculture Bulletin. No. 266, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  6. Burbridge, A.H., Leicester, K., McDavitt, S. and Majer, J.D. (1992) Ants as indicators of dis turbance at Yanchep National Park, Western Australia. J. Roy. Soc. West. Aust. 75, 89–95.Google Scholar
  7. Greenslade, P.J. (1973) Sample ants with pitfall traps: digging-in effect. Insect. Soc. 20, 345–53.Google Scholar
  8. Hill, M.O. (1979a) TWINSPAN: a Fortran Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in a Ordered Two-way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. New York: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
  9. Hill, M.O. (1979b) DECORANA: a Fortran Program for Detrending Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. New York: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
  10. Hólldobler, B. and Wilson, E.O. (1990) The Ants. London: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Keals, N. and Majer, J.D. (1991) The conservation status of ant communities along the Wubin-Perenjori corridor. In Nature Conservation 2: the Role of Corridors (D.A. Saunders and R.J. Hobbs, eds) pp. 387–93. Chipping Norton, Australia: Surrey Beatty & Sons.Google Scholar
  12. Ludwig, J.A. and Reynolds, J.F. (1988) Statistical Ecology: a Primer on Methods and Computing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Majer, J.D. (1978) An improved pitfall trap for sampling ants and other epigaeic invertebrates. J. Aust. Ent. Soc. 17, 261–2.Google Scholar
  14. Majer, J.D. (1983) Ants: bio-indicators of minesite rehabilitation, land-use and land conservation. Environ. Manag. 7, 375–83.Google Scholar
  15. Majer, J.D., Delabie, J.H.C. and Smith, M.R.B. (1994) Arboreal ant community patterns in Brazilian cocoa farms. Biotropica 26, 73–83.Google Scholar
  16. Petraitis, P.S. (1979) Likelihood measures of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 60, 703–10.Google Scholar
  17. Room, P.M. (1975) Diversity and organisation of the ground foraging ant faunas of forests, grassland and tree crops in Papua New Guinea. Aust. J. Zool. 23, 71–89.Google Scholar
  18. Samways, M.J. (1983) Community structure of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a series of habitats associated with citrus. J. Appl. Ecol. 20, 833–47.Google Scholar
  19. Samways, M.J. (1990a) Ant assemblage structure and ecological management in citrus and sub-tropical fruit orchards in Southern Africa. In Applied Myrmecology: a World Perspective (R.K. Vander Meer, K. Jaffe and A. Cedeno, eds) pp. 570–87. San Fransisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  20. Samways, M.J. (1990b) Species temporal variablity: epigaeic ant assemblages and management for abundance and scarcity. Oecologia 84, 482–90.Google Scholar
  21. Samways, M.J. (1994) Insect Conservation Biology. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Schluter, D. (1984) A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications. Ecology 65, 998–1005.Google Scholar
  23. Skaife, S.H. (1961) The Study of Ants. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  24. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1988) CANOCO: a Fortran Program for Canonical Community Ordination by Correspondence Analysis, Principal Components Analysis and Redundancy Analysis. The Netherlands: Wageningen.Google Scholar
  25. Wheeler, W.M. (1922) Ants of the Belgian Congo. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 45, 1–1139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Samways
    • 1
  • R. Osborn
  • F. Carliel
  1. 1.Invertebrate Conservation Research Centre, Department of Zoology and EntomologyUniversity of NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations