Public Choice

, Volume 100, Issue 3–4, pp 203–223 | Cite as

Economic freedom and equality: Friends or foes?

  • Niclas Berggren


How does economic freedom, mainly how property rights are designed and protected, relate to income equality? Whilst this is argued to be theoretically ambiguous, the empirical results reveal that there is a positive relationship between changes in economic freedom and equality: the more a country increased its economic freedom between 1975 and 1985, the higher the level of equality around 1985. Most important in this regard is trade liberalization and financial deregulation. Also, there are signs that the level of economic freedom in 1985 is negatively related to the level of equality around that year, plausibly because of less redistribution.


Positive Relationship Empirical Result Public Finance Trade Liberalization Economic Freedom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson, A.B. (1983). The economics of inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, R.J. and SalaiMartin, X. (1992). Public finance in models of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies 59(4): 645–661.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R.J. and Lee, J.W. (1993). International comparisons of educational attainment. Journal of Monetary Economics 32(3): 363–394.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, O.A. and Wu, W. (1996). Measuring economic freedom. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. De Vannsay, X. and Spindler, Z.A. (1994). Freedom and growth: Do constitutions matter? Public Choice 78(3–4): 359–372.Google Scholar
  6. Deininger, K. and Squire, L. (1996). Measuring income inequality: A new database. World Bank Economic Review 10(3): 565–591.Google Scholar
  7. Fölster, S. and Trofimov, G. (1996). Does equality promote growth? Working Paper No. 461, The Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  8. Gwartney, J.D., Lawson, R. and Block, W. (1996). Economic freedom of the world: 1975–1995. Vancouver, BC: The Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Heston, A. and Summers, R. (1991). The Penn world table (Mark 5): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950–1988. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2): 327–368.Google Scholar
  10. Lindert, P.H. and Williamson, J.G. (1983). English workers' living standards during the industrial revolution: A new look. The Economic History Review 36(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  11. Myhrman, J. (1994). Hur Sverige blev rikt. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
  12. North, D.C. and Weingast, B.R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenthcentury England. Journal of Economic History, 49(4): 803–832.Google Scholar
  13. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Perotti, R. (1996). Growth, income distribution, and democracy: What the data say. Journal of Economic Growth 1(2): 149–187.Google Scholar
  15. Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? American Economic Review 84(3): 600–621.Google Scholar
  16. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rosenberg, N. and Birdzell, L.E., Jr. (1986). How the west grew rich: The economic transformation of the industrial world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. World Bank (various years). World development report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niclas Berggren
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsStockholm School of EconomicsStockholmSweden; and
  2. 2.City UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations