Genetica

, Volume 99, Issue 2–3, pp 165–172 | Cite as

Beliefs about genetic influences on mathematics achievement: a cross-cultural comparison

  • David H. Uttal
Article
  • 109 Downloads

Abstract

The poor mathematics performance of children in the United States has become a topic of national concern. Numerous studies have shown that American children consistently perform worse than their counterparts in many parts of the world. In contrast, children in China, Japan, Taiwan, and other Asian countries consistently perform at or near the top in international comparisons. This paper examines possible causes of the poor performance of American children and the excellent performance of Asian children. Contrary to the beliefs of many Americans, the East Asian advantage in mathematics is probably not due to a genetically-based advantage in mathematics. Instead, differences in beliefs about the role of genetics may be partly responsible. Asians strongly believe that effort plays a key role in determining a child's level of achievement, whereas Americans believe that innate ability is most important. In addition, despite the relatively poor performance of their children, American parents are substantially more satisfied with their children's performance than Asian parents. The American emphasis on the role of innate ability may have several consequences for children's achievement. For example, it may lead children to fear making errors and to expend less effort on mathematics than their Asian counterparts. As research on genetic influences on behavior, traits, and abilities increases scientists should be careful to ensure that the public understands that genetics does not directly determine the exact level of a child's potential achievement.

beliefs cultural differences mathematicsachievement motivation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benbow, C.P., 1988. Sex differences in mathematical reasoning abil-ity in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11: 169–183.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, C.C. & D.H. Uttal, 1988. Cultural values, parents' beliefs, and children's achievement in the United States and China. Human Development 31: 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, C.C. & H.W. Stevenson, 1989. Homework: A cross-cultural examination. Child Development 60: 551–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garden, R.A., 1987. The second IEA mathematics study. Comparative educational review 31: 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geary, D., 1994. Children's mathematical development: Research and practical application. American Psychological Association, Washington.Google Scholar
  6. Greenfield, J., 1991. Officially Important Survey is moronic, not America's schoolchildren. Ann Arbor News, June 9, D13.Google Scholar
  7. Gould, S.J., 1981. The mismeasure of man. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Herrnstein, R.J. & C. Murray, 1994. The bell curve. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Hirsch, J., 1975. The bankruptcy of 'science' without scholarship. Educational Theory 25: 3–28.Google Scholar
  10. Lynn, R., 1982. IQ in Japan and the United States shows a growing disparity. Nature 297: 222–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lynn, R., 1987. The intelligence of the mongoloids: Apsychometric, evolutionary and neurological theory. Personality and individual differences 8: 813–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lynn, R., 1988. Educational achievement in Japan. M.E. Sharp, Inc., Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
  13. McKnight, C.C., F.J. Crosswhite, J.A. Dossey, E. Kifer, J.O. Swafford, K.J. Travers & T.J. Cooney, 1987. The underachieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. school mathematics from an international perspective. Stipes, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  14. National Commission on Excellence in Education, 1983. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
  15. Rushton, J.P., 1994. The equalitarian dogma revisited. Intelligence 19: 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rushton, J.P., 1995. Race, evolution, and behavior: a life-history. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  17. Steen, L.A., 1987. Mathematics education: A predictor of scientific competitiveness. Science 237: 251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stevenson, H.W., C. Chen & S.Y. Lee, 1993. Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children: Ten years later Science 259: 53–58.Google Scholar
  19. Stevenson, H.W. & J.W. Stigler, 1992. The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. Summit Books, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Stevenson, H.W., S.Y. Lee, C. Chen, M. Lummis, J. Stigler, L. Fan & F. Ge, 1990. Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. Child Development 61: 1053–1066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stevenson, H.W., S.Y. Lee, C. Chen, J.W. Stigler, C.C. Hsu & S. Kitamura, 1990. Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 221, Vol. 55.Google Scholar
  22. Stevenson, H.W., S.Y. Lee & J.W. Stigler, 1986. Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children. Science 231: 693–699.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Uttal, D.H., 1995. Beliefs, motivation, and achievement in mathe-matics: A cross-national perspective, pp. 25–38 in Motivation in mathematics, editex by M. Carr. NJ Press, Hampton, Cresskill.Google Scholar
  24. Uttal, D.H., M. Lummis & H.W. Stevenson, 1988. Low and high mathematics achievement in Japanese, Chinese, and American elementary-school children. Developmental Psychology 24: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vernon, P.E., 1961. The structure of human abilities (2nd edn) Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  26. Vernon, P.E., 1982. The abilities and achievements of Orientals in North America. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • David H. Uttal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations