Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 100, Issue 1–3, pp 163–170 | Cite as

Breeding durum wheat for pasta quality in Canada

  • J.M. Clarke
  • B.A. Marchylo
  • M.I.P. Kovacs
  • J.S. Noll
  • T.N. McCaig
  • N.K. Howes
Article

Abstract

Canada was the largest durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var durum) producer in 1994, and in recent years supplied over 70% of world export trade in durum. Breeding for pasta quality is, therefore, a primary objective in Canadian durum breeding programs. Control of cultivar registration and stringent grading standards ensure that durum of consistent high quality is produced for domestic and export markets. The objectives of breeding programs include: improvement of traits related to production concerns, such as grain yield, disease resistance and sprouting resistance, and those related to end-use quality, such as protein concentration and quality; milling quality factors, such as semolina yield; colour of the wheat, semolina and pasta; and cooking quality. Selection and testing for quality begins at very early generations and becomes more stringent for advanced inbred lines. Selection is practised at the F1 or F2, where appropriate, using monoclonal antibodies to identify desirable gamma gliadins (γ-45 ) or low molecular weight glutenin subunits (LMW 2) that have been shown to be related to end-use quality. Grain from early generation yield trials, starting at F4, is screened for protein concentration and pigment content by Near Infrared reflectance, and for gluten strength by sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) sedimentation and micro-mixograph. Promising lines entered into multi-location yield trials are screened with more time-consuming procedures to fully assess suitability for pasta processing. These tests include semolina yield, ash and colour, and predictions of gluten strength such as mixograph and alveograph, and cooking quality. Candidate cultivars with quality equal to or better than the mean of the check cultivars can be proposed for registration after three years in the Durum Cooperative Test. It takes approximately 10 years from performing a cross to registrating a new cultivar.

Keywords

Durum Wheat Cooking Quality Near Infrared Reflectance Gluten Strength Pasta Quality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axford, D.W.E., E.E. McDermott & D.G. Redman, 1978. Small scale tests of breadmaking quality. Milling Feed Fertil 161(5): 18.Google Scholar
  2. Bernier, A.M. & N.K. Howes, 1994. Quantification of variation in tyrosinase activity among durum and common wheat cultivars. J Cereal Sci 19: 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, H.C., 1966. Laboratory purifier for durum semolina. Cereal Sci Today 11: 533-542.Google Scholar
  4. Carrillo, J.M., J.F. Vasquez & J. Orellana, 1990. Relationship between gluten strength and gluten in proteins in durum wheat cultivars. Plant Breed 104: 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, J.M., N.K. Howes, J.G. Mcleod & R.M. DePauw, 1993. Selection for gluten strength in three durum wheat crosses. Crop Sci 33: 956–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daun, J.K., 1978. Mathematical method for estimating colour of spaghetti and mustard flour. Cereal Chem 55(5): 692–698.Google Scholar
  7. Dexter, J.E. & R.R. Matsuo, 1977. Influence of protein content on some durum wheat quality parameters. Can J Plant Sci 57: 717–727.Google Scholar
  8. Dexter, J.E., R.R. Matsuo, F.G. Kosmolak, D. Leisle & B. Marchylo, 1980. The suitability of the SDS-sedimentation test for assessing gluten strength in durum wheat. Can J Plant Sci 60: 25–29.Google Scholar
  9. Dexter, J.E., R.R. Matsuo & B.C. Morgan, 1981. High temperature drying: Effect on spaghetti properties. J Food Sci 46(6): 1741–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dexter, J.E. & R.R. Matsuo, 1982. Effect of smudge and blackpoint, mildewed kernels and ergot on durum wheat quality. Cereal Chem 59: 63–69.Google Scholar
  11. Howes, N.K., M.I. Kovacs, D. Leisle, M.R. Dawood & W. Buskuk, 1989. Screening of durum wheats for pasta-making quality with monoclonal antibodies for gliadin 45. Genome 32(6): 1096–1099.Google Scholar
  12. Howes, N.K., J. Zawistowski & D. Leisle, 1995. Two durum wheat LMW-2 glutenin alleles distinguished by a monoclonal antibody test. Plant Breed (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Kosmolak, F.G., J.E. Dexter, R.R. Matsuo, D. Leisle & B.A. Marchylo, 1980. A relationship between durum wheat quality and gliadin electrophorograms. Can J Plant Sci 60: 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kovacs, M.I.P, 1985. An improved sodium dodecyl sulfate sedimentation test for early generation screening of durum wheat quality. Science de Aliments 5: 123–131.Google Scholar
  15. Kovacs, M.I.P., G. Dahlke & J.S. Noll, 1994. Gluten viscoelasticity. Its usefulness in the Canadian durum wheat breeding program. J Cereal Sci 19: 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kovacs, M.I.P., N.K. Howes, D. Leisle & J. Zawistowski, 1995a. Effect of two different low molecular weight glutenin subunits on durum wheat pasta quality parameters. Cereal Chem 72: 85–87.Google Scholar
  17. Kovacs, M.I.P., J.S. Noll, G. Dahlke & D. Leisle, 1995b. Pasta viscoelasticity: Its usefulness in the Canadian durum wheat breeding program. J Cereal Sci 22: 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kovacs, M.I.P., L.M. Poste-Flynn, G.S. Butler, S.M. Woods, D. Leisle, J.S. Noll & G. Dahlke, 1996. Durum wheat quality: Comparison of chemical and rheological screening tests with sensory analysis. J Cereal Sci (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Kruger, J.E. & K.H. Tipples, 1981. Modified procedure for use of the Perkin-Elmer Model 191 Grain Amylase Analyser in determining low levels of a-amylase in wheats and flours. Cereal Chem 58: 271–274.Google Scholar
  20. Landi, A. & R. Guarneri, 1992. Durum wheat and pasta industries: Twenty years of achievement in science and technology. In: P. Feillet (Ed.), Cereal Chemistry and Technology: A long Past and a Bright Future. Proceedings of the 9th International Cereal and Bread Congress, pp 139–142.Google Scholar
  21. Leisle, D., M.I. Kovacs & N. Howes, 1985. Inheritance and linkage relationships of gliadin proteins and glume colour in durum wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 27: 716–721.Google Scholar
  22. DeMarchi, F., 1994. Durum wheat and pasta quality. In: European seminar: Quality of durum wheat and pasta, pp. 75–82. Pole Europeen de Communication et d'Echanges Agro-alimentaires. Region Rhone-Alpes 78 route de Paris F-69260 Charbonnieres les Bains, France.Google Scholar
  23. Matsuo, R.R., L.J. Malcolmson, N.M. Edwards & J.E. Dexter, 1992. A colorimetric method for estimating spaghetti cooking losses. Cereal Chem 69(1): 27-29.Google Scholar
  24. McCaig, T.N. & J.M. Clarke, 1995. Breeding durum wheat in western Canada: Historical trends in yield and related variables. Can J Plant Sci 75: 55–60.Google Scholar
  25. McCaig, T.N., J.G. McLeod, J.M. Clarke & R.M. DePauw, 1992. Measurement of durum pigment with an NIR instrument operating in the visible range. Cereal Chem 69(6): 671–672.Google Scholar
  26. Pogna, N.E., J.C. Autran, F. Mellini, D. Lafiandra & P. Feillet, 1990. Chromosome 1B-encoded gliadins and glutenins in durum wheat:genetics and relationship to gluten strength. J Cereal Sci 11: 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Symons, S.J., J.E. Dexter, R.R. Matsuo & B.A. Marchylo, 1996. Rapid instrumental estimation of bran specks in durum semolina. Cereal Chem (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Yupsanis, T. & M. Moustakas, 1988. Relationship between quality, colour of glume and gliadin electrophorograms in durum wheat. Plant Breeding 101: 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.M. Clarke
    • 1
  • B.A. Marchylo
    • 2
  • M.I.P. Kovacs
    • 3
  • J.S. Noll
    • 3
  • T.N. McCaig
    • 1
  • N.K. Howes
    • 3
  1. 1.Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre, Swift CurrentAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaSaskatchewanCanada
  2. 2.Grain Research LaboratoryCanadian Grain CommissionWinnipegCanada
  3. 3.Cereal Research CentreAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations