Public Choice

, Volume 101, Issue 1–2, pp 59–84

Public accounting fudges towards EMU: A first empirical survey and some public choice considerations

  • Bernard Dafflon
  • Sergio Rossi
Article

Abstract

This paper analyses some one-off measures and other accounting tricks that EU member States have been using to qualify for EMU membership. Moving from empirical evidence to strategic goals, this investigation brings to the fore three crucial issues: the weakness of the methodological rules of the European system of accounts used to assess budgetary convergence in line with the Maastricht Treaty; the open-ended definition of the required budgetary discipline; the shortcomings of the excessive deficit procedure enforced through the Stability Pact. The conclusion urges a return to a strict annual balance requirement for governments' current accounts, to impede strategic adjustments of budgetary positions that are in fact creative accounting operations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beytout, N. (1997). La nouvelle vitrine sociale. Les Echos (11–12 July): 16.Google Scholar
  2. Commission des Communautés Européennes (1994). Proposition de règlement (CE) du Conseil relatif au système européen des comptes nationaux et régionaux dans la Communauté européenne. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, COM(94) 593 final.Google Scholar
  3. Communautés Européennes (1993). Union européenne: Recueil des traités. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  4. Costello, D. (1997). The pact for stability and growth. ECU 38(1): 14–17.Google Scholar
  5. Dafflon, B. (1995). L'équilibre des budgets publics locaux: quelle stratégie et quels risques de dérapage? Politiques et management public 13(3): 141–165.Google Scholar
  6. Dafflon, B. (1996). The requirement of a balanced local budget: Theory and evidence from the Swiss experience. In G. Pola, G. France and R. Levaggi (Eds.), Developments in local government finance: Theory and policy, 228–250. Cheltenham and Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Dafflon, B. (1997). Les critères budgétaires de Maastricht: quelques éléments de réflexion pour les finances publiques suisses. In H. Schmid and T. Slembeck (Eds.), Finanz-und Wirtschaftspolitik in Theorie und Praxis, 95–116. Bern: Haupt Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Dafflon, B. and Rossi, S. (1996). La logique des critères budgétaires du Traité sur l'Union Européenne: premiers éléments d'analyse critique. Working Papers 272 (June). University of Fribourg: Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  9. Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.) (1996). Frankreich darf beim Defizit-Kriterium mogeln. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (1 November). In Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 69 (6 November): 13. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  10. Deutsche Bundesbank (1997a). Revaluation of gold and foreign exchange reserves. Monthly Report 49(6): 5–7. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  11. Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.) (1997b). Erklärung des Bundesministers der Finanzen und des Präsidenten der Deutschen Bundesbank vom 19. Juni 1997. In Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 36 (23 June): 4. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  12. Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.) (1997c). France. Financial Times (25 August). In Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 48(27 August): 6. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  13. Dublin European Council (1996). Presidency conclusions. Dublin, 13–14 December (URL: <http://europa.eu.int/en/record/dublin /dub-en.htm>).Google Scholar
  14. Economist (The) (1997a). A spanner in the works. The Economist 343(8020): 17–18.Google Scholar
  15. Economist (The) (1997b). Kicking and screaming into 1999. The Economist 343(8020): 23–25.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission (1993). Council Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 of 22 November 1993 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Communities 36(L 332): 7–9.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission (1996). Council Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 of 25 June 1996 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the Community. Official Journal of the European Communities 39(L 310): 1–469.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission (1997a). 1997 Annual economic report: Growth, employment and convergence on the road to EMU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, COM(97) 27 final.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission (1997b). Resolution of the European Council on the stability and growth pact. Official Journal of the European Communities 40(C 236): 1–2.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission (1997c). Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies. Official Journal of the European Communities 40(L 209): 1–5.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission (1997d). Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure. Official Journal of the European Communities 40(L 209): 6–11.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission (1997e). The Community Economy in 1997–99: Autumn 1997 economic forecasts. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, COM(97) 554.Google Scholar
  23. European Monetary Institute (1995). Progress towards convergence. Frankfurt am Main: European Monetary Institute.Google Scholar
  24. European Monetary Institute (1996). Progress towards convergence 1996. Frankfurt am Main: European Monetary Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Eurostat (1979). European system of integrated economic accounts (ESA). 2nd edition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  26. Eurostat (1996a). European System of Accounts: ESA 1995. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  27. Eurostat (1996b). Transition from ESA 1979 to ESA 1995: Issues affecting the government deficit. Item 8 on the agenda of the meeting of the Working Party on National Accounts (Luxembourg, 21–22 October), B1/CN 308 e. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  28. Eurostat (1997a). Deficit & debt: Eurostat rules on accounting issues. News Release 10(3 February). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  29. Eurostat (1997b). Accounting rules: Eurostat takes further decisions on deficit and debt. News Release 16(21 February). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  30. Eurostat (1997c). Accounting rules: Complementary decisions of Eurostat on deficit and debt. News Release 24(26 March). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  31. Eurostat (1997d). Deficit and debt: Three complementary decisions by eurostat on accounting rules. News Release 33(30 April). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  32. Eurostat (1997e). New decisions of Eurostat on deficit and debt. News Release 88(17 December). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  33. Federal Statistical Office (1996). Press release of the Federal Statistical Office on the France Télécom case. Press Release (1 November). Wiesbaden: Federal Statistical Office.Google Scholar
  34. Hughes Hallet, A.J. and McAdam, P. (1996a). Fiscal deficit reductions in line with the Maastricht criteria for monetary union: An empirical analysis. CEPR Discussion Paper 1351( February).Google Scholar
  35. Hughes Hallet, A.J. and McAdam, P. (1996b). Four essays and a funeral: Budgetary arithmetic under the Maastricht treaty. CEPR Discussion Paper 1505(December).Google Scholar
  36. Jameson, M. (1988). A Practical guide to creative accounting. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  37. Kinkel, K. (1997). German government is not guilty of creative accounting over EMU. Financial Times (18 March): 24.Google Scholar
  38. Laughland, J. (1996). How to pass EMU without making the grade. The Wall Street Journal Europe (9 October). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 67(24 October): 6–7. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  39. Laughland, J. and Paul, J.-M. (1997). Belgium cooks its EMU books. The Wall Street Journal Europe (9 January). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 2(10 January): 14–15. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  40. Maillet, P. (1997). Le pacte de stabilité et de croissance: portée et limites du compromis de Dublin? Revue du Marché commun et de l'Union européenne 404(January): 5–12.Google Scholar
  41. Mélitz, J. (1997). Some cross-country evidence about debt, deficits and the behaviour of monetary and fiscal authorities. CEPR Discussion Paper 1653(May).Google Scholar
  42. Melloan, G. (1997). How do you qualify for the Euro club? By cheating. The Wall Street Journal Europe (28 January). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 6(29 January): 16–17. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  43. Morisset, A. (1997). Budgetary surveillance: The operational aspects. ECU 38(1): 18–20.Google Scholar
  44. Münster, W. (1997). Das Spiel mit den Defiziten. Süddeutsche Zeitung (23 August). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 48(27 August): 4. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  45. Norman, P. (1997). Problems mount for embattled waigel. Financial Times Survey (9 June): III.Google Scholar
  46. Oldag, A. (1997). Wenn Statistik zum Politikum wird. Süddeutsche Zeitung (1–2 March). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 13(5 March): 10. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  47. Pijper, T. (1993). What is “creative accounting”? In Creative accounting: The effectiveness of financial reporting in the UK, 32–43. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Raphael, T. (1996). Lies, damned lies and statistics. TheWall Street Journal Europe (4 November). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 69(6 November): 14–15. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  49. Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (1997). Fehlentwicklungen bei den öffentlichen Finanzen beheben (Brief des Sachverständigenrates zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung vom 23. Mai 1997 an den Bundeskanzler). Press communiqué (4 June). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 32 (6 June): 1–2. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  50. Silbert, N. (1997). SNCF: l'Etat troque 20 milliards de dettes contre 2.000 embauches. Les Echos (11–12 July): 16.Google Scholar
  51. Stauffer, P. (1997). The Maastricht convergence criteria as seen by the national accounts. Mimeo. Paper delivered at the Meeting of the Swiss Society of Statistics and Economics in Lucerne. March.Google Scholar
  52. Uctum, M. and Wickens, M. (1997). Debt and deficit ceilings, and sustainability of fiscal policies: An intertemporal analysis. CEPR Discussion Paper 1612(March).Google Scholar
  53. von Hiller, C. (1996). Gezinkte Karten. Die Welt (2 November). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 69 (6 November): 14. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  54. Waigel, T. (1995). Bundesfinanzminister Dr. Theo Waigel bei der gemeinsamen Sitzung des EU-und des Finanzausschusses des Bundestages, Bonn, am 29. November 1995. In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 81(4 December): 2–4. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar
  55. White, D. (1997). Spain tries new approach on privatisation funds. Financial Times (29 September): 2.Google Scholar
  56. Wyplosz, C. (1991). Monetary union and fiscal policy discipline. In European Communities (Ed.), European economy 1(special edition): 165–184. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  57. Zänker, A. (1996). Keine Tricks beim Euro. Die Welt (11 October). In Deutsche Bundesbank (Ed.), Auszüge aus Presseartikeln 64(14 October): 14–15. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Dafflon
    • 1
  • Sergio Rossi
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Economic and Social SciencesUniversity of Fribourg, MiséricordeFribourgSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity College LondonUK-U.K

Personalised recommendations