Plant and Soil

, Volume 234, Issue 2, pp 233–237

Soil physical conditions in a New York orchard after eight years under different groundcover management systems



An experiment was conducted near Ithaca, New York, to compare orchard soil and groundcover management systems (GMSs) in a silty clay loam soil (mixed, mesic, Glosaquic Hapludalf). Three replications of four GMS treatments were randomly assigned to 12 plots and maintained since 1992 in 2 m-wide strips within tree rows: (1) Sod: Red fescue (Festuca rubra) turfgrass mowed biweekly; (2) Post-HBS: Post-emergence applications of glyphosate herbicide in May and July annually; (3) Pre-HBS: Pre-emergence applications of paraquat, diuron and norflurazon herbicides each May; and (4) Mulch: A 15-cm depth layer of shredded hardwood bark mulch, renewed triennially. After eight years of continuous treatments, we compared soil physical conditions and hydraulic properties in these GMSs. Bulk density was lower and soil porosity greater under Mulch than other GMSs. Infiltration was more rapid under Mulch than other GMSs, and under Post-HBS than Sod. Saturated hydraulic conductivity ranged from 6 × 10−4 m.s−1under Sod to 12 × 10−4 m.s−1 under Mulch plots, and was equivalent in Sod and Pre-HBS, lower in Sod than Post-HBS or Mulch treatments, higher in Post-HBS than Pre-HBS, and higher in Mulch than all other GMSs. Volumetric soil water content at field capacity ranged from 0.47 under Mulch to 0.40 under Sod, and was not significantly different among GMSs between 0.99 and 39.22 kPa of pressure. GMS treatments and related management practices at this orchard had substantially different long-term effects on soil physical conditions. Compaction and reduced infiltration in Sod compared with other GMSs were attributed to tractor wheel traffic during mowing. Mulch treatments improved soil conditions relative to other GMSs. Greater infiltration rates and hydraulic conductivity under Post-HBS compared with Pre-HBS suggest relative advantages of post-emergence herbicides.

groundcover management systems orchard soil physical conditions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Analytical Software 1998 Statistix for windows, user's manual. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL. 350 p.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson J L, Bingham G E and Hill R W 1992 Effects of permanent cover crop competition on sour cherry tree evapotranspiration, growth and productivity. Acta Hort. 313, 135–142.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson D 1980. The distribution and effectiveness of the roots of tree crops. Hort. Rev. 2, 424–481.Google Scholar
  4. Bugg R L and Waddington C 1994 Using cover crops to manage arthropod pests of orchards: A review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 50, 11–28.Google Scholar
  5. Danielsen R E and Sutherland P L 1986 Porosity. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd edn. Ed. A Klute. pp 443–461. Agron. No 9, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  6. Gill WR and Berg G E 1967 Soil Dynamics in Tillage and Traction. Agriculture Handbook 316, ARS, USDA, US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Glenn D M and Welker W V 1989 Orchard soil management systems influence rainfall infiltration. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114, 1014.Google Scholar
  8. Haynes R J 1980 Influence of soil management practices on the orchard agro-ecosystem. Agro-Ecosyst. 6, 3–32.Google Scholar
  9. Hipps N A and Samuelson T J 1991 Effects of long-term herbicide use, irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on soil fertility in a apple orchard. J. Sci. Food Agric. 55, 377–387.Google Scholar
  10. Hogue E J and Neilsen G H 1987 Orchard floor vegetation management. Hort. Rev. 9, 377–430.Google Scholar
  11. Hoyt G D and Hargrove WL 1986 Legume Cover Crops for Improving Crop and Soil Management in the Southern United States. HortScience 21, 397–402.Google Scholar
  12. Hurto K A, Turgen A J and Spomer L A 1980 Physical characteristics of thatch as a turfgrass growing medium. Agron. J. 72, 165–167.Google Scholar
  13. Jorajuria D and Draghi L 1997 The distribution of soil compaction with depth and the response of a perennial forage crop. J. Agric. Engng. Res. 66, 261–265.Google Scholar
  14. Klute A 1986 Water retention: laboratory methods. InMethods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd edn. Ed. A Klute. pp 635–662. Agron. No 9, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  15. Klute A and Dirksen C 1986 Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd edn. Ed. A Klute. pp 687–734. Agron. No 9, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  16. Kutilek M 1980 Constant rainfall infiltration. J. Hydrol. 45, 289–303.Google Scholar
  17. Lipecki J and Berbec S 1997 Soil management in perennial crops, orchards and hop gardens. Soil Till. Res. 43, 169–184.Google Scholar
  18. Merwin I A 1993 Alternatives to herbicides for orchard weed control. New York State Fruit Quarterly 7, 6–8.Google Scholar
  19. Merwin I A, Rosenberg D A, Engle C A, Rist D L and Fargione M 1995 Comparing mulchs, herbicides and cultivation as orchard groundcover management systems. HortTechnology 5, 151–158.Google Scholar
  20. Merwin I A, Stiles W C and Van E S H M 1994 Orchard groundcover management impacts on soil physical properties. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119, 216–222.Google Scholar
  21. Miyazaki T 1993 Water flow in soils. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Murray J J and Juska F V 1977 Effect of management practices on thatch accumulation, turf quality and leaf spot damage in common Kentucky Bluegrass. Agron. J. 69, 365–369.Google Scholar
  23. Ogden C B, Van Es H M and Schindelbeck R R 1997 Miniature rain simulator for field measurement of soil infiltration. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 1041–1043.Google Scholar
  24. Parker M L and Meyer J R 1996 Peach tree vegetative and root growth respond to orchard floor management. HortScience 31, 330–333.Google Scholar
  25. Reynolds WD and Elrick D E 1990 Ponded infiltration from a single ring: I. Analysis of steady flow. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 1233–1241.Google Scholar
  26. Skroch WA and Shribbs J M 1986 Orchard Floor Management: An Overview. HortScience 21, 390–393.Google Scholar
  27. Tisdall J M 1989 Soil management. Acta Hort. 240, 161–168.Google Scholar
  28. White R H and Dickens R 1984 Thatch accumulation in Bermudagrass as influenced by cultural practices. Agron. J. 76, 19–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant ScienceUniversidade Tras os Montes e Alto DouroVila RealPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Fruit & Vegetable ScienceCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations