Advertisement

Tertiary Education and Management

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 47–63 | Cite as

Understanding Collegiality: The Changing Oxbridge Model

  • Ted Tapper
  • David Palfreyman
Article

Abstract

With particular reference to theUniversities of Oxford and Cambridge, thispaper analyses interpretations of thecollegiate tradition. It examines pastinterpretations of the tradition, the pressuresthat have led to its reformulation and assessesthe likelihood of its survival in the future. The paper assumes that both academic demos andintellectual collegiality should be centralcharacteristics of any institution that intendsto call itself a university.

Keywords

Education Research Analyse Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Annan, N. (1999). The Dons: Mentors, Eccentrics and Geniuses. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  2. Askling, B., Bauer, M. & S. Marton (1999). 'Swedish Universities towards Self-Regulation: A New Look at Institutional Autonomy', Tertiary Education and Management 5(2), 175–195.Google Scholar
  3. Bargh, C., Scott, P. & Smith, D. (1996). Governing Universities: Changing the Culture? Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. (1990). The Idea of Higher Education. Milton Keynes: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berquist, W.H. (1992). The Four Cultures of the Academy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Bess, J.L. (1998). Collegiality and Bureaucracy in the Modern University. New York, Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brock, M.G. & Curthoys, M.C. (eds.) (1997). The History of the University of Oxford, Volume VI: Nineteenth Century Oxford, Part I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brooke, C.N.L. (1993). A History of the University of Cambridge, Volume IV: 1870–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carter, I. (1990). Ancient Cultures of Deceit: British University Fiction in the Post-War Years. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Paris: IAU Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dougill, J. (1998). 'The English Athens'. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  12. Duke, A. (1996). Importing Oxbridge: English Residential Colleges and American Universities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. EAIR (2000). Strategic Management and Institutional Policies, Track 2, 22nd Annual Forum, Berlin.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, G. (1999). Calling Academia to Account: Rights and Responsibilities. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Halsey, A.H. (1992). The Decline of Donnish Dominion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kennedy, D. (1997). Academic Duty. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kogan, M. & Kogan, D. (1983). The Attack on Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  18. Morrell, J. (1997). Science at Oxford, 1914–1939: Transforming an Arts University. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Newman, J.H. (1852, reprinted 1959). The Idea of a University. Garden City, New York: Image Books.Google Scholar
  20. Norback, L.E. (2000). New Modes of Internal Governance of Higher Education Institutions: The Case of Goteborg University, Tertiary Education and Management 6(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
  21. Palfreyman, D. (1998). Oxford Colleges: Permanent Endowment, Charity Trusteeship and Personal Liability, Charity Law and Practice Review 5(2), 85–134.Google Scholar
  22. Palfreyman, D. (1999). Is Porterhouse Really “a Charity”? Charity Law and Practice Review 6(2), 151–166.Google Scholar
  23. Palfreyman, D. (2001). The Oxford Tutorial, Oxford, Oxford Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  24. Perellon, J.-F. (1998). The Challenge of Change: The Politics of Higher Education Reform in Switzerland, Tertiary Education and Management 4(3), 199–207.Google Scholar
  25. Pratt, J. (1997). The Polytechnic Experiment, 1965–1992. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rudolph, F. (1990). The American College and University: A History. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ryan, A. (1998). Liberal Anxieties and Liberal Education. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  28. Russell, C. (1993). Academic Freedom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Salter, B. & Tapper, T. (2000). The Politics of Governance in Higher Education: the Case of Quality Assurance, Political Studies 48, 66–87.Google Scholar
  30. Shattock, M. (2000). Strategic Management in European Universities in an Age of Increasing Institutional Self-Reliance, Tertiary Education and Management 6(2), 93–104.Google Scholar
  31. Shinn, C.H. (1986). Paying the Piper: The Development of the UGC, 1919–46. Lewes Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, D. & Langslow, A.K. (eds.) (1999). The Idea of a University. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Soares, J. (1999). The Decline of Privilege: The Modernization of Oxford University. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tapper, T. & Palfreyman, D. (2000). Oxford and the Decline of the Collegiate Tradition. London: Woburn Press.Google Scholar
  35. Tapper, T. & Salter, B. (1995). The Changing Idea of University Autonomy. Studies in Higher Education 20(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
  36. Thorne, M. & Cuthbert, R. (1996). Autonomy, Bureaucracy and Competition: The ABC of Control in Higher Education. In R. Cuthbert (ed.), Working in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press, 170–193.Google Scholar
  37. University of Cambridge (1989). Reporter (Wass Syndicate), 19 May.Google Scholar
  38. University of Oxford (1966). Commission of Inquiry: Report (Franks Commission). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  39. University of Oxford (1997). Commission of Inquiry: Report (North Commission). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted Tapper
    • 1
  • David Palfreyman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of English and American Studies, Arts BuildingUniversity of SussexFalmer, BrightonUK

Personalised recommendations