Advertisement

Topoi

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 189–201 | Cite as

What is a Forest? On the Vagueness of Certain Geographic Concepts

  • Brandon Bennett
Article

Keywords

Fuzzy Logic Precise Interpretation Vague Concept Arbitrary Region Vague Predicate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alker, S., V. Joy, P. Roberts and N. Smith: 2000, ‘The Definition of Brownfield’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43, 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, B.: 1998, ‘Modal Semantics for Knowledge Bases Dealing with Vague Concepts’, in A. G. Cohn, L. Schubert and S. Shapiro (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference (KR-98), Morgan Kaufman, pp. 234–244.Google Scholar
  3. Cohn, A. G. and N. M. Gotts: 1996a, ‘The “Egg-Yolk” Representation of Regions with Indeterminate Boundaries’, in P. A. Burrough and A. U. Frank (eds.), Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 171–187.Google Scholar
  4. Cohn, A. G. and N. M. Gotts: 1996b, ‘Representing Spatial Vagueness: A Mereological Approach’, in L. C. Aiello and S. Shapiro (eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference (KR-96), Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 230–241.Google Scholar
  5. Dubois, D. and H. Prade: 1988, ‘An Introduction to Possibilistic and Fuzzy Logics’, in P. Smets, E. H. Mamdani, D. Dubois and H. Prade (eds.), Non-Standard Logics for Automated Reasoning, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Elkan, C.: 1993, ‘The Paradoxical Success of Fuzzy Logic’, in Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-93), Washington: AAAI Press, pp. 698–703.Google Scholar
  7. Eschenbach, C.: 2000, ‘Ontology, Predicates and Identity’, in S. Winter (ed.), Geographical Domain and Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 19 of Geoinfo, Vienna: Vienna University of Technology, Institute for Geoinformation, pp. 33–36.Google Scholar
  8. Fine, K.: 1975, ‘Vagueness, Truth, and Logic’, Synthese 30, 263–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foody, G.: 1992, ‘A Fuzzy Sets Approach to the Representation of Vegetation Continua from Remotely Sensed Data: An Example from Lowland Heath’, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58, 221–225.Google Scholar
  10. Frank, A.: 1997, ‘Spatial Ontology: A Geographical Information Point of View’, in O. Stock (ed.), Spatial and Temporal Reasoning, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 321–352.Google Scholar
  11. Goguen, J.: 1969, ‘The Logic of Inexact Concepts’, Synthese 19, 325–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Husch, B., C. Miller and T. Beers: 1963, Forest Mensuration, Chichester: Wiley. (3rd edition 1982).Google Scholar
  13. Johnston, D. and K. Lowell: 2000, ‘Forest Volume Relative to Cartographic Boundaries and Sample Spacing, Unit Size and Type’, Geographical and Environmental Modelling 4, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kulik, L.: 2000, ‘Vague Spatial Reasoning Based on Supervaluation’, in S. Winter (ed.), Geographical Domain and Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 19 of Geoinfo, Vienna: Vienna University of Technology, Institute for Geoinformation, pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
  15. Lehmann, F. and A. G. Cohn: 1994, ‘The EGG/YOLK Reliability Hierarchy: Semantic Data Integration Using Sorts with Prototypes’, in Proceedings of the Conference on Information Knowledge Management, ACM Press, pp. 272–279.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, D.: 1993, ‘Many, But Almost One’, in J. Bacon, K. Campbell and L. Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality, and Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar
  17. Lukasiewicz, J. and A. Tarski: 1930, ‘Untersuchungen über den Aussagenkalkül’, Comptes rendus des séances de la société des sciences et des lettres de Varsovie 3, 1–21. English translation by J. H. Woodger in A. Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mark, D. and F. Csillag: 1989, ‘The Nature of Boundaries on “Area-Class” Maps’, Cartographica 26, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCarthy, J.: 1993, ‘Notes on Formalizing Context’, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-93).Google Scholar
  20. McGee, V.: 1997, ‘“Kilimanjaro”’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (suppl.), 141–195.Google Scholar
  21. Ordnance Survey (2000), Land-Line User Guide v3.0. (http://www.o-s.co.uk/downloads/vector/landline/Lline\_w.pdf)Google Scholar
  22. Smith, B.: 1995, ‘On Drawing Lines on a Map’, in A. U. Frank, W. Kuhn and D. M. Mark (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Proceedings of COSIT 95, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 475–484.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, B.: 2001, ‘Fiat Objects’, Topoi 20, 131–148 (this volume).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UNESCO: 1973, International Classification and Mapping of Vegetation, A Report of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Series 6, Ecology and Conservation.Google Scholar
  25. Usery, E.: 1996, ‘A Conceptual Framework and Fuzzy Set Implementation for Geographic Features’, in P. A. Burrough and A. U. Frank (eds.), Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
  26. USGCRP: n.d., GCDIS: Global Change Data and Information System, United States Global Change Research Program web site. (http://www.globalchange.gov)Google Scholar
  27. USGS: 1994a, Field Methods for Vegetation Mapping, United States Geological Survey, NPS Vegetation Mapping Program. (http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/ fieldmethods/index.html)Google Scholar
  28. USGS: 1994b, Standardized National Vegetation Classification System, United States Geological Survey, NPS Vegetation Mapping Program. (http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/classification/ index.html)Google Scholar
  29. Varzi, A. C.: 2001, ‘Vagueness in Geography’, Philosophy & Geography 4, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williamson, T.: 1994, Vagueness, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Zadeh, L. A.: 1965, ‘Fuzzy Sets’, Information and Control 8, 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zadeh, L. A.: 1975, ‘Fuzzy Logic and Approximate Reasoning’, Synthese 30, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brandon Bennett
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of LeedsU.K

Personalised recommendations