Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 13–23

Diagnostic Conceptualization of Autism Among Indian Psychiatrists, Psychologists, and Pediatricians

Article

Abstract

Diagnostic criteria for autism and background characteristics used by 937 Indian psychiatrists, psychologists and pediatricians were examined. Participants were asked to rate 18 behaviors as necessary for a diagnosis of autism, helpful but not necessary, or not helpful in a diagnosis of autism, and were asked to provide other information about their experiences with autism. Professionals' experience with diagnosing cases did not vary by profession and, in general, the three professions agreed about the characteristics most necessary for a diagnosis. However, within-group differences were found on the agreement over the usefulness of individual characteristics and amount of experience diagnosing cases as autistic. Comparisons with DSM-III and DSM-IV criteria suggest that Indian professionals may adhere to these systems. Conclusions about diagnosis in a cultural context and areas for future research are suggested.

Indian psychologist autism autism diagnosis diagnostic conceptualization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1980). DSM-III (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, H. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross cultural psychology: research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. (1997). Conceptualizations of autism and intervention practices: International perspectives. In D. J. Cohen and F. R. Volkmar, Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (pp. 947–950). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Filipek, P. A., Accardo, P. J., Baranek, G. T., Cook, E. H., Dawson, G., Gordon, B., Gravel, J. S., Johnson, C. P., Kallen, R. J., Levy, S. E., Minshew, N. J., Prizant, B. M., Rapin, I., Rogers, S. J., Stone, W. L., Teplin, S., Tuchman, R. F., & Volkmar, F. R. (1999). The screening and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 439–484.Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher, B. J., Jones, B. J., & Byrne, M. M. (1990). A national survey of mental health professionals concerning the causes of early infantile autism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 934–939.Google Scholar
  7. Gautam, R. P. (1974). General practitioners' attitudes towards mental illness. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 16, 238–243.Google Scholar
  8. Gillberg, C., Grufman, M., Persson, E., & Themner, U. (1986). Psychiatric disorders in mildly and severely mentally retarded urban children and adolescents: Epidemiological aspects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 68–74.Google Scholar
  9. Gillberg, C., Steffenburg, S., & Schaumann, H. (1991). Is autism more common now than ten years ago? British Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 403–409.Google Scholar
  10. Gilliam, J. E., & Coleman, M. (1982). A survey of knowledge about autism among experts and caregivers. Behavioral Disorders, 7, 189–196.Google Scholar
  11. Joshi, M. C. (1992). India. In V. S. Sexton and J. D. Hogan (Eds.). International psychology: Views from around the world (pp. 206–219), Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  12. Klin, A., Lang, J., Cicchetti, D. V., & Volkmar, F. R. (2000). Brief report: Interrater reliability of clinical diagnosis and DSM-IV criteria for autistic disorder: Results of the DSM-IV autism field trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 163–167.Google Scholar
  13. Kumar, R. (1988). Child development in India: Health, welfare and management. New Delhi: Ashish.Google Scholar
  14. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.Google Scholar
  15. McConachie, H. (1995). Critique of current practices in assessment of children. In P. Zinkin and H. McConachie (Eds.). Disabled Children and Developing Countries (pp. 110–130), London: McKeith.Google Scholar
  16. Segall, M. H., Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J. W. (1998). Cross-cultural psychology as a scholarly discipline: On the flowering of culture in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 53, 1101–1110.Google Scholar
  17. Stone, W. L. (1987). Cross-disciplinary perspectives on autism. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 12, 615–630.Google Scholar
  18. Sturmey, P., & Sevin, J. A. (1994). Defining and assessing autism. In J. L. Matson (Ed.). Autism in children and adults: Etiology, assessment and intervention (pp. 13–36), Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  19. World Health Organization. (1992). International Classification of Diseases (10th ed).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos Angeles
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations