SmartClients: Constraint Satisfaction as a Paradigm for Scaleable Intelligent Information Systems
- 69 Downloads
Many information systems are used in a problem solving context. Examples are travel planning systems, catalogs in electronic commerce, or agenda planning systems. They can be made more useful by integrating problem-solving capabilities into the information systems. This poses the challenge of scaleability: when hundreds of users access a server at the same time, it is important to avoid excessive computational load.
We present the concept of SmartClients: lightweight problem-solving agents based on constraint satisfaction which can carry out the computation- and communication-intensive tasks on the user's computer. We present an example of an air travel planning system based on this technology.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Borning, A., Duisberg, R., Feldman-Benson, B., Kramer, A., & Woolf, M. (1987). Constraint hierarchies. In Proceedings 1987 ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications, pages 48–60, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- 2.Choueiry B. Y. (1994). Abstraction Methods for Resource Allocation. PhD thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne.Google Scholar
- 3.FIPA. (1998). Foundation of Intelligent Physical Agents. http://www.fipa.org. Google Scholar
- 4.Fox, M. (1987). Constraint-Directed Search: A Case Study of Job-Shop Scheduling. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., Pitman, London.Google Scholar
- 5.Freuder, E. C., & Wallace, R. J. (1992). Partial constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence, 58(1): 21–70.Google Scholar
- 6.Jango. (1998). Excite Product Finder. http://www.jango.com. Google Scholar
- 7.Kondrak, G., & van Beek, P. (1997). A theoretical evaluation ofselected backtracking algorithms. Artificial Intelligence, 89: 365–387.Google Scholar
- 8.Linden, G., Hanks, S. & Lesh, N. (1997). Interactive assessment ofuser preference models: The automated travel assistant. In Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on User Modeling.Google Scholar
- 9.Mackworth, A. K. (1977). Consistency in networks ofrelations. Artificial Intelligence, 8: 99–118.Google Scholar
- 10.Pu, P., & Faltings, B. (2000). Enriching buyers' experiences: The SmartClient approach. In CHI: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- 11.Sabin, D., & Freuder, E. C. (1996). Configuration as composite constraint satisfaction. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence and Manufacturing Research Planning Workshop, pages 153–161.Google Scholar
- 12.Sanjay Mittal, F. F. (1989). Towards a generic model ofconfiguration tasks. In Proceedings of the 11th IJCAI, pages 1395–1401, Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
- 13.Sathi, A., & Fox, M. S. (1989). Constraint-directed negotiation ofresource allocations. In L. Gasser and M. Huhns, eds., Distributed Artificial Intelligence Volume II, pages 163–194. San Mateo, CA Pitman Publishing; London and Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- 14.Stefik, M. (1981). Planning with constraints (MOLGEN: Part 1). Artificial Intelligence, 16(2): 111–140.Google Scholar
- 15.Torrens, M., Weigel, R., & Faltings, B. (1997). Java Constraint Library: Bringing constraints technology on the Internet using the Java language. In Working Notes of the Workshop on Constraints and Agents, Tehnical Report WS-97-05, AAAI-97, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.Google Scholar
- 16.Travelocity. (1998). http://www.travelocity.com. Google Scholar
- 17.Tsang, E. (1993). Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction. London, UK Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 18.van Beek, P. (1995). CSPLib: A CSP Library Written in C Language. ftp://ftp.cs.ualberta.ca/pub/vanbeek/software.Google Scholar
- 19.Willmott, S., Calisti, M., Faltings, B., Gonzalez, S. M., Belakdhar, O., & Torrens, M. (2000). CCL: Expressions ofchoice in agent communication. In The Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-2000), Boston, USA.Google Scholar