Advertisement

International Review of Education

, Volume 47, Issue 3–4, pp 185–200 | Cite as

English for Globalisation or for the World's People?

  • Robert Phillipson
Article

Abstract

The article explores the role of English in ongoing processes of globalisation, the reasons for its dominance, and the need for conceptual clarification in analysing English worldwide. Examples from the post-colonial and post-communist worlds and the European Union reveal increasing corporate involvement in education, and World Bank policies that favour European languages. Studies of global English range from those that uncritically endorse global English to those which see it as reflecting a post-imperial but essentially capitalist agenda. Many of the contem-porary trends are captured in two competing language policy paradigms that situate English in broader economic, political and cultural facets of globalisation, the Diffusion of English paradigm, and the Ecology of Languages paradigm. A number of studies of various dimensions of linguistic and professional imperialism in the teaching of English to Asians reveal the persistence of western agendas in education. There is also increasing documentation of resistance to this, both at the level of awareness of the need to anchor English more firmly in local cultural systems, and at classroom level. Language pedagogy needs to ensure that English is not learned subtractively. Only in this way can globalisation be made more accountable and locally relevant.

Keywords

Language Policy Ongoing Process Language Pedagogy Cultural Facet European Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnihotri, Rama Kant and Khanna, Amrit Lal. 1997. Problematizing English in India. Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, Neville. 2000. Language Policy and Planning in South Africa: Some Insights. In Phillipson (ed.). 2000a, pp. 170–173.Google Scholar
  3. Baik, Martin and Shim, Rosa. 1995. Language, Culture, and Ideology in the Textbooks of Two Koreas. In: Tickoo, Mackan L., ed., Language and Culture in Multilingual Societies: Issues and Attitudes. Singapore: Regional Language Center.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, Richard W. 1992. Images of English. A Cultural History of the Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Translation of Ce que parler veut dire: l'é conomie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard, 1982).Google Scholar
  6. Braine, George (ed.). 1999. Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Brock-Utne, Birgit. 2000. Whose Education for All? The Recolonization of the African Mind. New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  8. Canagarajah, Suresh A. 1999. Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crystal, David. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dasgupta, Probal. 1993. The Otherness of English: India's Auntie Tongue Syndrome. Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Desai, Zubeida. 2000. Mother Tongue Education: The Key to African Language Development? A Conversation with an Imagined South African Audience. In: Phillipson (ed.). 2000a, pp. 174–178.Google Scholar
  12. Fishman, Joshua A., Conrad Andrew W. and Rubal-Lopez, Alma (eds.) 1996. Post-Imperial English. Status Change in Former British and American Colonies, 19401990. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Graddol, David. 1997. The Future of English? London: The British Council.Google Scholar
  14. Heugh, Kathleen. 2000. Giving Good Weight to Multilingualism in South Africa. In: Phillipson (ed.). 2000a, pp. 234–238.Google Scholar
  15. Hoggart, Richard. 1992. An Imagined Life. Life and Times 195991. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  16. Illich, Ivan. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  17. Kachru, Braj B. 1986. The Alchemy of English. The Spread, Functions and Models of Non-Native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  18. Kachru, Braj B. 1997. World Englishes and English-Using Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 17: 67–87.Google Scholar
  19. Kandiah, Thiru. 2001. Whose Meanings? Probing the Dialectics of English as a Global Language. In: Goh, Robbie et al., eds., Ariels-Departures and Returns: A Festschrift for Edwin Thumboo. Singapore: Oxford University Press, pp. 98–117.Google Scholar
  20. Kenny, Brian and Savage, William (eds.). 1997. Language and Development. Teachers in a Changing World. Harlow and New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Mazrui, Alamin. 1997. The World Bank, the Language Question and the Future of African Education. Race and Class 38(3): 35–48.Google Scholar
  22. Miklós Kontra, Phillipson, Robert, Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove and Várady, Tibor (eds.). 1999. Language: A Right and a Resource. Approaching Linguistic Human Rights. Budapest: Central European University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1997. The Legitimate and Illegitimate Offspring of English. In: Smith and Forman (eds.). 1997, pp. 182–203.Google Scholar
  24. Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996. Linguistic Ecology. Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Ngugi wa Thiong'o. 1993. Moving the Centre. The Struggle for Cultural Freedoms. London: James Currey; Nairobi: EAEP, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  26. Oda, Masaki. 2000. Linguicism in Action: Language and Power in Academic Institutions. In: Phillipson (ed.). 2000a, pp. 117–121.Google Scholar
  27. Parakrama, Arjuna. 1995. De-hegemonizing Language Standards. Learning from (Post)Colonial Englishes aboutEnglish’. Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Pennycook, Alastair. 1994. The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  29. Pennycook, Alastair. 1998. English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Phillipson, Robert. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Phillipson, Robert. 1999a. Review of Fishman, Conrad and Rubal-Lopez (eds.). 1996. Language, 75/ 2, 165–168.Google Scholar
  32. Phillipson, Robert. 1999b. Voice in Global English: Unheard Chords in Crystal Loud and Clear. Review Article on Crystal 1997. Applied Linguistics 20(2): 265–276.Google Scholar
  33. Phillipson, Robert (ed.). 2000a. Rights to Language. Equity, Power, and Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Phillipson, Robert. 2000b. English in the New World Order: Variations on a Theme of Linguistic Imperialism and ‘World’ English. In: Ricento (ed.). 2000, pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
  35. Phillipson, Robert and Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. 1999. Englishisation: One Dimension of Globalisation. In: Graddol, David and Meinhoff, Ulrike, eds., English in a Changing World, AILA Review vol. 13, pp. 17–36.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, Larry E. and Forman, Michael L. (eds.). 1997. World Englishes 2000. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
  37. Spring, Joel. 1998. Education and the Rise of the Global Economy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Rahman, Tariq. 1999. Language, Education and Culture. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rajan, Rajeswari Sunder (ed.). 1992a. The Lie of the Land. English Literary Studies in India. Delhi. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rajan, Rajeswari Sunder. 1992b. Brokering English Studies: The British Council in India. In Rajan (ed.). 1992a, pp. 130–155.Google Scholar
  41. Ricento, Thomas (ed.). 2000. Ideology, Politics and Language Policies: Focus on English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenthal, Daniel. 1997. Exams Abroad, CAM, Easter 1997, 31–32.Google Scholar
  43. Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. 2000a. Linguistic Genocide in Education-or Worldwide Diversity and Human Eights? Mahwah, New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  44. Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. 2000b. Linguistic Human Rights and Teachers of English. In: Hall, Joan Kelly & Eggington, William G. (eds.), The Sociopolitics of English Language Teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 22–44.Google Scholar
  45. Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove and Phillipson, Robert (eds.). 1994. Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  46. Spack, Ruth. 1997. The Rhetorical Constructions of Multilingual Students. TESOL Quarterly 31(4): 765–774.Google Scholar
  47. Tickoo, Makhan. 1996. Fifty Years of English in Singapore: All gains, (a) Few Losses? In: Fishman, Conrad & Rubal-Lopez (eds.). 1996, pp. 431–455.Google Scholar
  48. Toh, Glenn Koon Peng. 1999. Primary School English Textbooks in Singapore: An Examination of Cultural and Ideological Content. PhD thesis, School of Education, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  49. Tsuda, Yukio. 1994. The Diffusion of English: Its Impact on Culture and Communication. Keio Communication Review 16: 49–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Phillipson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations