Brain and Mind

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 85–118 | Cite as

Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations

  • John D. Pettigrew


A midbrain neural basis for the perceptualoscillations of binocular rivalry is suggestedon the basis of fMRI studies of rivalry andinferences from the properties of rivalry thatcannot be explained from the known propertiesof primary visual cortical (V1) neurons. Therivalry switch is proposed to activatehomologous areas of each cerebral hemispherealternately, by means of a bistable oscillatorcircuit that straddles the midline of theventral tegmentum. This bistable oscillatoroperates at the same slow rate that ischaracteristic of perceptual rivalryalternations. Whilst attempting to divert thepresent preoccupation with cortical mechanismsfor rivalry, the new proposal integrates manycortical areas, in keeping with recent evidencethat binocular rivalry involves widespreadareas of the hemispheres. By linking rivalry tointerhemispheric switching mechanisms in thisway, the new proposal for the switch makes theprediction that binocular rivalry will besubject to high level influences such as moodand motivation. These predictions are beingfulfilled, with rivalry playing an increasingrole in the diagnosis and understanding if mooddisorders, schizophrenia and other psychiatricconditions.

binocular rivalry interhemispheric switch midbrain oscillator neural basis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson, J.,Campbell, F.W.,Fiorentini, A. andMaffei, L., 1973: The dependence of monocular rivalry on spatial frequency, Perception 2, 127-133.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, T.J. andPurves, D., 1997: Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9905-9908.Google Scholar
  3. Bair, W.,Zohary, E. andNewsome, W.T., 2001: Correlated firing in macaque visual area MT: Time scales and relationship to behavior, J. Neurosci. 21, 1676-1697.Google Scholar
  4. Baloh, R.W.,Honrubia, V. andKonrad, H.R., 1976: Periodic alternating nystagmus, Brain 99: 11-26.Google Scholar
  5. Bejjani, B.-P.,Damier, P.,Arnulf, I.,Thivard, L.,Bonnet, A.-M. andDormont, D., 1999: Transient acute depression induced by high-frequency deep-brain stimulation, New Engl. J. Med. 340, 1476-1480.Google Scholar
  6. Blake, R., 1989: A neural theory of binocular rivalry, Psychol. Rev. 96, 145-167.Google Scholar
  7. Blake, R.,Westendorf, D.H. andYang, Y., 1991: Discriminating binocular fusion from false Fusion, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 32, 2821-2825.Google Scholar
  8. Blakemore, C., 1969: Binocular depth discrimination and the nasotemporal division, J. Physiol. 205, 471-497.Google Scholar
  9. Blasdel, G.,Mitchell, D.E.,Muir, D.W. andPettigrew, J.D., 1977: A physiological and behavioural study in cats of the effect of early visual experience with contours of a single orientation, J. Physiol. 265, 615-636.Google Scholar
  10. Bonneh, Y. andSagi, D., 1999: Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry, Vision Res. 39, 271-281.Google Scholar
  11. Bottini, G.,Sterzi, R.,Paulesu, E.,Vallar, G.,Cappa, S. F. andErminio, F., 1994: Identification of the central vestibular projections in man: a positron emission tomography activation study, Exp. Brain Res. 99, 164-169.Google Scholar
  12. Breese, B.B., 1899: On inhibition, Physiol. Monogr. 3, 1-65.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, F.W.,Gilinsky, A.S.,Howell, E.R.,Riggs, L.A. andAtkinson, J., 1973: The dependence of monocular rivalry on orientation, Perception 2: 123-125.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, T.A. andHe, S., 2000: Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry, Curr Biol. 10, 1055-1058.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, S.M.,Xu, J.D.,Radkov, E., et al., 2000: Syntheses and relaxation properties of mixed gadolinium hydroxypyridinonate MRI contrast agents, Inorg. Chem 39, 5747-5756.Google Scholar
  16. Crick, F. andKoch, C., 1995: Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature 375, 121-123.Google Scholar
  17. Damasio, A., 2000: The Feeling of What Happens. Harcourt, NY.Google Scholar
  18. Diaz-Caneja, E, 1928: Sur líalternance binoculaire, Annales D'Oculistique 165, 721-731.Google Scholar
  19. Engel, A.K.,Roelfsema, P.R.,Fries, P.,Brecht, M. andSinger, W., 1997: Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding, Cereb Cortex 7, 571-582.Google Scholar
  20. Gross, C.G.,Rodman, H.R.,Gochin, P.M. andColombo, M.W., 1993: Inferior temporal cortex as a pattern recognition device, in E. Baum (ed.), Computational Learning and Cognition: Proceedings of the 3rd NEC Research Symposium.Google Scholar
  21. Harrad, R.A.,McKee, S.P.,Blake, R. andYang, Y., 1994: Binocular rivalry disrupts stereopsis, Perception 23, 15-28.Google Scholar
  22. Hart, N.S.,Partridge, J.C. andCuthill, I.C., 2000: Retinal asymmetry in birds, Curr. Biol. 10, 115-117.Google Scholar
  23. Howard, I.P., 1995: Depth from binocular rivalry without spatial disparity, Perception 24, 67-74.Google Scholar
  24. Humphrey, G. Keith andGoodale, Melvyn A., 1998: Probing unconscious visual processing with the McCollough effect, Consciousness and Cognition 7, 494-519.Google Scholar
  25. Hunt, J. andGuilford, J.P., 1933: Fluctuation of an ambiguous figure in dementia praecox and in manic-depressive patients, J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 27, 443-452.Google Scholar
  26. Kovacs, I.,Papathomas, T.V.,Yang, M. andFeher, A, 1996: When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular Rivalry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 15508-15511.Google Scholar
  27. Lai, Y.Y. andSiegel, J.M., 1988: Medullary regions mediating atonia, J. Neurosci 8, 4790-4796.Google Scholar
  28. Laing, C.R. andChow, C.C., 2001: A spiking neuron model of binocular rivalry, J. Comput. Neurosci. (submitted).Google Scholar
  29. Lee, S.H. andBlake, R., 1999: Rival ideas about binocular rivalry, Vision Res. 39, 1447-1454.Google Scholar
  30. Leopold, D.A. andLogothetis, N.K., 1996: Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkey's percepts during binocular rivalry, Nature 379, 549-553.Google Scholar
  31. Leopold, D.A. andLogothetis, N.K., 1999: Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 254-264.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, L.,Tyler, C.W. andSchor, C.M., 1992: Failure of rivalry at low contrast: evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process, Vision Res. 32, 1471-1479.Google Scholar
  33. Livingston, M., 2001: A spatial frequency interpretation of Mona Lisa, Science.Google Scholar
  34. Logothetis, N.K., 1998: Single units and conscious vision, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1801-1818.Google Scholar
  35. Logothetis, N.K.,Leopold, D.A. andSheinberg, D.L., 1996: What is rivaling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380, 621-624.Google Scholar
  36. Lotto, R.B.,Williams, S.M. andPurves, D., 1999: An empirical basis for Mach bands, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 5239-5244.Google Scholar
  37. Luck, S.J.,Hillyard, S.A.,Mangun, G.R. andGazzaniga, M.S., 1989: Independent hemispheric attentional systems mediate visual search in split-brain patients, Nature 342, 543-545.Google Scholar
  38. Lumer, E.D.,Friston, K.J. andRees, G., 1998: Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain, Science 280, 1930-1934.Google Scholar
  39. Mackay, D.M. andMackay, V., 1982: Explicit dialogue between left and right half systems of split brains, Nature 295, 690.Google Scholar
  40. Marder, E. andCalabrese, R.L., 1996: Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation, Physiol. Rev. 76, 687-717.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, S.M.,Liu, G.B.,Ngo, T.T.,Hooper, G.,Riek, S.,Carson, R.G. andPettigrew, J.D., 2000: Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry, Curr. Biol. 10, 383-392.Google Scholar
  42. Miller, S.M.,Mitchell, P.B.,Ngo, T.,Gynther, BM,Hyslop, K.,Petigrew J.D. andGeffen L., 2001 (submitted): Slow binocular rivalry in bipolar disorder.Google Scholar
  43. Munk, M.H.J.,Roelfsema, P.R.,Konig, P.,Engel, A.K. andSinger, W., 1996: Role of reticular activation in the modulation of intracortical synchronization, Science 272, 271-274.Google Scholar
  44. Ngo, T.T.,Miller, S.M.,Liu, G.B. andPettigrew, J.D., 2000: Binocular rivalry and perceptual coherence. Curr. Biol. 10, R134-136.Google Scholar
  45. Parfionovitch, Y.,Meyer, F. andDorje, G., 1992: Tibetan Medical Paintings, Illustrations by Sangye Gyamtso. Serindia Pub. Harry N. Abrams Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  46. Pettigrew, J.D. andMiller, S.M., 1998: A “sticky” interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2141-2148.Google Scholar
  47. Pettigrew, J.D.,Collin, S.P. andOtt, M., 1999: Convergence of highly-specialized behavior, eye movements and visual optics in the sandlance (Teleostei) and the chameleon (Reptilia), Curr Biol 9, 421-424.Google Scholar
  48. Phillipson, O.T., 1979: Afferent projections to the ventral tegmental area of Tsai and interfascicular nucleus: a horseradish peroxidase study in the rat, J. Comp. Neurol. 187, 117-143.Google Scholar
  49. Poeppel, E.,Brinkmann, R.,von Cranow, D. andSinger, W., 1978: Association and dissociation of visual functions in a case of bilateral occipital lobe infarction, Arch. Psyciat. Nervenk. 225, 1-21.Google Scholar
  50. Polonsky, A.,Blake, R.,Braun, J. andHeeger, D.J., 2000: Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry, Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1153-1159.Google Scholar
  51. Purves, D.,Shimpi, A. andLotto, R.B., 1999: An empirical explanation of the Cornsweet effect, J. Neurosci. 19, 8542-8551.Google Scholar
  52. Ramachandran, V.S., 1994: Phantom limbs, neglect dyndromes, repressed memories, and Freudian psychology, Int. Rev. Neurobiol., 37, 291-333.Google Scholar
  53. Ramachandran, V.S.,Cobb, S. andLevi, L., 1994: The neural locus of binocular rivalry and monocular diplopia in intermittent exotropes, Neuroreport May 9; 5(9), 1141-1144.Google Scholar
  54. Rowat, P.F. andSelverston, A.I., 1997: Oscillatory mechanisms in pairs of neurons connected with fast inhibitory synapses, J. Comp. Neurosci. 4, 103-127.Google Scholar
  55. Russell, B., 1935: Religion and Science. The Home University of Modern Knowledge. Thornton Butterworth Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  56. Searle, J.R., 2000: Consciousness, Annu Rev Neurosci. 23, 557-578.Google Scholar
  57. Sengpiel, F., 2000: Binocular rivalry: Ambiguities resolved, Curr. Biol. 7, R447-R450.Google Scholar
  58. Sengpiel, F.,Blakemore, C. andHarrad, R., 1995: Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: a possible neural basis of binocular rivalry, Vision Res. 35, 179-195.Google Scholar
  59. Shannahoff-Khalsa, D, 1993: The Ultradian rhythm of alternating cerebral hemispheric activity, Int. J. Neurosci. 70, 285-298.Google Scholar
  60. Sheinberg, D.L. andLogothetis, N.K., 1997: The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 3408-3413.Google Scholar
  61. Srinivasan, R.,Russel, D.P.,Edelman, G.M. andTononi, G., 1999: Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception, J. Neurosci. 19, 5435-5448.Google Scholar
  62. Stone, J., 1966: The nasotemporal division of the cat's retina, J. Comp. Neurol. 126, 585-600.Google Scholar
  63. Stone, J.,Leicester, J. andSherman, S.M., 1973: The nasotemporal division of the monkey's retina, J. Comp. Neurol. 150, 333-348.Google Scholar
  64. Suthers, R.A., 1997: Peripheral control and lateralization of birdsong, J. Neurobiol. 33, 632-652.Google Scholar
  65. Tong, F.,Nakayama, K.,Vaughan, J.T. andKanwisher, N., 1998: Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex, Neuron. 21, 753-759.Google Scholar
  66. Vallar, G.,Bottini, G.,Rusconi, M.L. andSterzi, R., 1993: Exploring somatosensory hemineglect by vestibular stimulation, Brain 116, 71-86.Google Scholar
  67. Vitte, E.,Derosier, C.,Caritu, Y.,Berthoz, A.,Hasboun, D. andSoulie, D., 1996: Activation of the hippocampal formation by vestibular stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study, Exp. Brain Res. 112, 523-526.Google Scholar
  68. Wade, N.J., 1998: Early studies of eye dominances, Laterality 3, 97-108.Google Scholar
  69. Wade, N.J. andWenderoth, P., 1978: The influence of color and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect, Vision Res. 18, 827-836.Google Scholar
  70. van der Zwan, R. andWenderoth, P., 1994: Psychophysical evidence for area V2 involvement in the reduction of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocular rivalry, Vis Neurosci. 11, 823-830.Google Scholar
  71. Vidyasagar, T.R., 1998: Gating of neuronal responses in macaque primary visual cortex by an attentional spotlight, Neuroreport 9, 1947-1952.Google Scholar
  72. Walker, P., 1975: Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations, Percept Psychophys 18, 467-473.Google Scholar
  73. Wolfe, J.M.,Alvarez, G.A. andHorowitz, T.S., 2000: Attention is fast but volition is slow, Nature 406, 691.Google Scholar
  74. Zaidel, E.,Clarke, J.M. andSuyenobu, B., 1990: Hemispheric independence: a paradigm case for cognitive neuroscience, in A.B. Scheibel andA. Wechsler (eds), A Neurobiology of Higher Cognitive Function, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 297-355.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • John D. Pettigrew
    • 1
  1. 1.Vision, Touch and Hearing Research CentreUniversity of QueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations