European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 107, Issue 6, pp 607–614 | Cite as

Susceptibility of Clematis Varieties and Species to Stem Infection by Phoma Clematidina as an Indicator for Resistance to Wilt

  • Pieter van de Graaf
  • Timothy M. O'Neill
  • Jill M. Chartier-Hollis
  • Mary E. Joseph


The susceptibility to stem rot and wilt caused by Phoma clematidina was tested for a range of clematis varieties and species widely grown in Europe, and compared with their susceptibility to wilt in practice as judged by amateur and commercial growers in two postal surveys. Most small flowering clematis species did not die back when unwounded stems were inoculated with spores of P. clematidina, and were also reported in the surveys as being very resistant to wilt. In contrast, large flowering hybrids were found to be highly susceptible both to stem infection by P. clematidina and to wilt in practice according to growers. A significant positive linear relationship existed between the susceptibility scores for disease in the stem inoculation test and those for wilt from the surveys. Fungal isolations were made from the stems of naturally wilted clematis plants from British nurseries and private gardens. Unlike the many other fungal species isolated, P. clematidina occurred very frequently, especially in stems of large flowering varieties. Together with the results from the grower surveys and stem inoculation trial, this indicates that this fungus is a regular cause of clematis wilt. The stem inoculation test with P. clematidina described in this study would be useful for European breeders and growers to determine the susceptibility of new clematis varieties to wilt before they are marketed.

breeder's test fungal isolations grower survey incidence inoculation stem rot 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arthur JC (1885) Disease of clematis. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Third Annual Report 1884: 383-385Google Scholar
  2. Blok I (1965) Verwelkingsziekte in clematis. Jaarboek Proefstation voor de Boomkwekerij 1964: 82-87Google Scholar
  3. Boerema GH (1993) Contributions towards a monograph of Phoma (Coelomycetes). II. Section Peyronellaea. Persoonia 15: 197-221Google Scholar
  4. Boerema GH and Dorenbosch MMJ (1979) Mycologischtaxonomisch onderzoek. Verslagen en Mededelingen Plantenziektenkundige Dienst Wageningen 153 (Jaarboek 1978): 17-21Google Scholar
  5. Bücher-Niederwalluf F (1933) Pflanzung und Pflege der Clematis. Die Gartenwelt 37: 589-590, 601Google Scholar
  6. Ebben MH and Last FT (1966) Clematis wilt. Report Glasshouse Crops Research Institute 1965: 128-131Google Scholar
  7. Foussat J (1896) Une maladie des clématites à grandes fleurs. Le Jardin 10: 124-125Google Scholar
  8. Gloyer WO (1915) Ascochyta clematidina, the cause of stem-rot and leaf-spot of clematis. Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 331-342Google Scholar
  9. Howells J (1993) Clematis wilt. A review of the literature. The Plantsman 15: 148-160Google Scholar
  10. Howells J (1994) Vulnerability to clematis wilt in large flowered clematis. The Clematis 51-60Google Scholar
  11. Jackman AG (1900) Hybrid clematis. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society 24: 315-322Google Scholar
  12. Klebahn H (1891) Zwei vermutlich durch Nematoden erzeugte Pflanzenkrankheiten. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten 1: 321-325Google Scholar
  13. Margot P (1998) Planting and pruning of clematis. The Clematis 121-122Google Scholar
  14. Morel F (1903) La maladie noire des clématites. Revue Horticole 75: 364-365Google Scholar
  15. Riekstins I (1989) My point of view concerning clematis wilt. Clematis International 8-9Google Scholar
  16. Schumann K and Bemann W(1972) Zum Problem des Clematis-Sterbens. Archiv für Pflanzenschutz 8: 103-108Google Scholar
  17. Smith GR (1987) Leaf Spot and Wilt of Clematis caused by Phoma clematidina (Thum.) Boerema. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  18. Van de Graaf P (1997) Non-fungal organisms as a cause of wilt in clematis. The Clematis 47-52Google Scholar
  19. Van de Graaf P (1999) Biology and Control of Phoma clematidina, causal Agent of Clematis Wilt. PhD thesis, University of Derby, Derby, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Kuik AJ and Brachter E (1997) Schimmelziekte bij clematis steekt opnieuw de kop op. De Boomkwekerij 9: 16-17Google Scholar
  21. Wolff GW(1996) An Investigation into ClematisWilt. BSc thesis, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pieter van de Graaf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Timothy M. O'Neill
    • 1
  • Jill M. Chartier-Hollis
    • 2
  • Mary E. Joseph
    • 2
  1. 1.ADAS Arthur Rickwood, Mepal, ElyCambs.UK
  2. 2.School of Environmental and Applied SciencesUniversity of DerbyDerbyUK

Personalised recommendations