Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 363–375 | Cite as

A Test of a Person -- Issue Contingent Model of Ethical Decision Making in Organizations

  • Susan J. Harrington
Article

Abstract

Despite the existence of a large number of models to explain the ethical decision-making process, rarely have the models been tested. This research validated the use of such models by showing that both issue-contingent variables and individual characteristics affect two commonly-proposed model components: i.e., moral judgment and moral intent. As proposed by Jones' (1991) ethical decision-making model and elaborated on by the author, the main effect of an issue-contingent variable, social consensus, and a closely-related variable, seriousness of consequences, influenced both moral judgment and moral intent.

Many ethical decision-making models also argue for the inclusion of individual characteristics in the decision-making process. This study proposed and found that the individual characteristics of rule orientation and denial of responsibility influenced moral judgment and moral intent, respectively. However, contrary to some models, interactions between issue-contingent variables and individual characteristics were insignificant relative to the main effects variables. The relationships found have implications for future model testing, as well as for practising managers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baum, R. J.: 1989, 'Carts, Horses, and Consent: An Ethical Dilemma for Computer Networking Policy', in C. C. Gould (ed.), The Information Web: Ethical and Social Implications of Computer Networking (Westview Press, Boulder, Co.), pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
  2. Blasi, A.: 1980, 'Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature', Psychological Bulletin 88(1), 1–45.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. and P. Cohen: 1975, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  4. Cronbach, L. J.: 1987, 'Statistical Tests for Moderator Variables: Flaws in Analyses Recently Proposed', Psychological Bulletin 102(3), 414–417.Google Scholar
  5. Dejoie, R., G. Fowler, and D. Paradice: 1991, Ethical Issues in Information Systems (Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company, Boston).Google Scholar
  6. Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken: 1989, 'Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing', Journal of Business Research 19, 83–107.Google Scholar
  7. Feldman, J. M.: 1992, 'Constructive Processes as a Source of Context Effects in Survey Research: Explorations in Self-Generated Validity', in N. Schwartz and S. Sudman (eds.), Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 49–61.Google Scholar
  8. Ford, R. D. and W. D. Richardson: 1994, 'Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature', Journal of Business Ethics 13, 205–221.Google Scholar
  9. Pritzsche, D. J.: 1989, 'An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of the Decision, Management Position, and Sex of the Respondent', Journal of Macromarketing 8(2), 29–39.Google Scholar
  10. Ganster, D. C., H. W. Hennessey and F. Luthans: 1983, 'Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models', Academy of Management Journal 26(2), 321–331.Google Scholar
  11. Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  12. Harman, H. H.: 1976, Modern Factor Analysis (3rd rev. ed.). (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, 'A General Theory of Marketing Ethics', Journal of Macromarketing 6(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, T. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  15. Kelman, H. C. and V. L. Hamilton: 1989, Crimes of Obedience (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  16. Kohlberg, L. and D. Candee: 1984, 'The Relationship of Moral Judgment to Moral Action', in W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (John Wiley & Sons, New York), pp. 52–73.Google Scholar
  17. Kurtines, W. M.: 1984, 'Moral Behavior as rule-Governed Behavior: A Psychosocial Role-Theoretical Approach to Moral Behavior and Development', in W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gerwitz (eds.), Mortality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (Wiley, New York), pp. 303–324.Google Scholar
  18. Nisan, M.: 1984, 'Content and Structure in Moral Judgment: An Integrative View', in W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gerwitz (eds.), Mortality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (Wiley, New York), pp. 208–224.Google Scholar
  19. Paulhus, D. L.: 1984, 'Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(3), 598–609.Google Scholar
  20. Podsakoff, P. M. and D. W. Organ: 1986, 'Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects', Journal of Management 12(4), 531–544.Google Scholar
  21. Podsakoff, P. M., W. D. Todor, R. A. Grover and V. L. Huber: 1984, 'Situational Moderators of Leader Reward and Punishment Behaviors: Fact or Fiction?', Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 34, 21–63.Google Scholar
  22. Randall, D. M. and M. F. Fernandes: 1991, 'Social Desirability Response Bias', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 805–817.Google Scholar
  23. Rest, J. R.: 1984, 'The Major Components of Morality', in W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gerwitz (eds.), Mortality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development (Wiley, New York), pp. 24–38.Google Scholar
  24. Saaty, T. L.: 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Porcess (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  25. Saaty, T. L.: 1982, Decision Making for Leaders (Wadsworth, Inc., Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  26. Schwartz, S. H.: 1973, 'Normative Explanations of Helping Behavior: A Critique, Proposal and Empirical Test', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9, 349–364.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz, S. H.: 1977, 'Normative Influences on Altruism', in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10 (Academic Press, New York), pp. 221–279.Google Scholar
  28. Staub, E.: 1978, Positive Social Behavior and Morality: Social and Personal Influences (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  29. Trevino, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model', Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  30. Vitell, S. J. and S. J. Grove: 1987, 'Marketing Ethics and the Techniques of Neutralization', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 433–438.Google Scholar
  31. Vitell, S. J., S. L. Nwachukwu, and J. H. Barnes: 1993, 'The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede's Typology', Journal of Business Ethics 12, 753–760.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan J. Harrington
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia CollegeMilledgevilleU.S.A

Personalised recommendations