Genetica

, 109:219 | Cite as

Karyotypic analysis of the cotton boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman

  • L.R. McNally
  • M.L. Beck
  • C.J. Biggers

Abstract

The diploid chromosome number of the cotton boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman, is 44. Both C‐ and N‐banding techniques of mitotic cells demonstrated constitutive heterochromatin in the p arm of the eight largest chromosomes, the p arm of the X chromosome, and the centromeric region of autosomal groups A–D. Neither the y nor the group E autosomes appeared to contain constitutive heterochromatin. Supernumerary chromosomes were not found in the boll weevil. Restriction endonuclease banding of primary spermatocytes revealed a rod‐shaped Xy tetrad in which the X and y were terminally associated. The p arm of the large, submetacentric X was C‐band positive. While two of the autosomal tetrads were typically ring‐shaped in primary spermatocytes, the remaining 19 autosomal tetrads were rod‐shaped.

Anthonomus grandis C‐banding Coleoptera cotton boll weevil N‐banding restriction enzyme banding 

References

  1. Asana, J. J., S. Makino & H. Niyama, 1942. A chromosomal survey of some Indian insects IV. On the sex chromosomes of some species of beetles (Coleoptera). Cytologia 12:187–205.Google Scholar
  2. Camacho, J.P.M., J. Cabrero, E. Viseras, M.D. Lopez-Leon, J. Navas-Castillo & J.D. Alche, 1991. G banding in two species of grasshopper and its relationship to C, N, and fluorescence banding techniques. Genome 34:638–643.Google Scholar
  3. Colomba, M.S., R. Vitturi & M. Zunino, 2000. Karyotype analysis, banding, and fluorescent in situ hybridization in the scarab beetle Gymnopleurus sturmi McLeay (Coleoptera Scarabaeoidea: Scarabaeidae). J. Hered. 91: 260–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolfini, S.F., 1990. Heterochromatin heterogeneity in Drosophila chromosomes detected by Alu I-banding. Hereditas 112: 141–149.Google Scholar
  5. Ennis, T.J., 1974. Chromosome structure in Chilocorus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). I. Fluorescent and giemsa banding patterns. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 16: 651–661.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ennis, T.J., 1975. Feulgen hydrolysis and chromosome banding in Chilocorus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17: 75–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fenocchio, A.S. & L.A.C. Bertollo, 1990. Supernumerary chromosomes in a Rhamdia hilarii population (Pisces, Pimelodidae). Genetica 81: 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foresti, F., L.F. Almeida-Toledo & S.A. Toledo, 1989. Supernumerary chromosome system, C-banding pattern characterization, and multiple nucleolus organizer regions in Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Pisces, Characidae). Genetica 79: 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox, D.P. & J.L. Santos, 1985. N-bands and nucleolus expression in Schistocerca gregaria and Locusta migratoria. Heredity 54: 333–341.Google Scholar
  10. Funaki, K., S. Matsui & M. Sasaki, 1975. Location of nucleolar organizers in animal and plant chromosomes by means of an improved N-banding technique. Chromosoma 49: 357–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garagna, S., A. Perez-Zapata, M. Zuccotti, S. Mascheretti, N. Marziliano, C.A. Redi, M. Aguilera, & E. Capanna, 1997. Genome composition in Venezuelan spiny-rats of the genus Proechimys (Rodentia, Echimyidae). I. Genome size, C-heterochromatin and repetitive DNAs in situ hybridization patterns. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 78: 36–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gosalvez, J., J.L. Bella, C. Lopez-Fernandez & R. Mezzanotte, 1987. Correlation between constitutive heterochromatin and restriction enzyme resistant chromatin in Arcyptera tornosi (Orthoptera). Heredity 59: 173–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, D.M., 1990. Muller's ratchet and the evolution of supernumerary chromosomes. Genome 33: 818–824.Google Scholar
  14. Guest, W.C. & T.C. Hsu, 1973. A new technique for preparing Drosophila neuroblast chromosomes. Drosophila Inf. Serv. 50: 193.Google Scholar
  15. Kaelbling, M., D.A. Miller & O.J. Miller, 1984. Restriction enzyme banding of mouse metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 90: 128–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lloyd, M.A. & G.H. Thorgaard, 1988. Restriction endonuclease banding of rainbow trout chromosomes. Chromosoma 96: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorite, P., A.E. Arangea, F. Luque & T. Palomeque, 1997. Analysis of the nucleolar organizing regions in the ant Tapinoma nigerrimum. Heredity 78: 578–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lue, P.S., J.E. Watson & F.R. Gilliland, Jr., 1973. Karyology of the boll weevil. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66: 801–802.Google Scholar
  19. Lue, P.S., J.E. Watson & F.R. Gilliland Jr., 1976. Karyotypic determination in the boll weevil. J. Hered. 67: 308–312.Google Scholar
  20. Mahan, J.T. & M.L. Beck, 1986. Heterochromatin in mitotic chromosomes of the Virilis species group of Drosophila. Genetica 68: 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marchi, A. & R. Mezzanotte, 1988. Restriction endonuclease digestion and chromosome banding in the mosquito, Culiseta longiareolata (Diptera: Culicidae). Heredity 60: 21–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Manicardi, G.C., D. Bizzaro, M. Mandrioli & U. Bianchi, 1998. Silver staining as a new banding technique to aphid chromosomes. Chromosome Res. 6: 55–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mezzanotte, R., P.E. Manconi & L. Ferrucci, 1986. On the possibility of localizing in situ Mus musculus and Drosophila virilis satellite DNAs by Alu I and EcoRI restriction endonucleases. Genetica 70: 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Cotton Council Bulletin, 1994. Boll Weevil Eradication: A National Strategy for Success. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  25. North, D.T., R.A. Leopold & D. Childress, 1981. Meiotic and mitotic chromosomes of the cotton boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 23: 443–447.Google Scholar
  26. Padilla, J.A., J.L. Fernandez-Garcia, A. Rabasco, M. Martinez-Trancon, I. Rodriguez de Ledsma & J.J. Perez-Regadera, 1993. Characterization of the karyotype of the tench (Tinca tinca L.) and analyzation of its chromosomal heterochromatic regions by C-banding, Ag-staining, and restriction endonuclease banding. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 62: 220–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Palomeque, T., E. Chica, M.A. Cano & R. Diaz de la Guadria, 1988. Karyotypes, C-banding, and chromosomal location of active nucleolar organizing regions in the Tapinoma (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Genome 30: 277–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palomeque, T., E. Chica & R. Diaz de la Guadria, 1990. Karyotype, C-banding, chromosomal location of active nucleolar organizing regions, and B-chromosomes in Lasius niger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Genome 33: 267–272.Google Scholar
  29. Palomeque, T., E. Chica & R. Diaz de la Guardia, 1993. Supernumerary chromosome segments in different genera of Formicidae. Genetica 90: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pieczarka, J.C., C.Y. Nagamachi, R.M.S. Barros & M.S. Mattevi, 1996. Analysis of constitutive heterochromatin by fluorochromes and in situ digestion with restriction enzymes in species of the group Callithrix argentata (Callitrichidae, Primates). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 72: 325–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pimpinelli, S., G. Santini & M. Gatti, 1976. Characterization of Drosophila heterochromatin. Chromosoma 57: 377–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rufas, J.S., J. Gosalvez, C. Lopez-Fernandez & H. Cardoso, 1983. Complete dependence between Ag, NORs and C-positive heterochromatin revealed by simultaneous Ag-NOR C-banding method. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 7: 275–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, S.G., 1949. Evolutionary changes in the sex chromosomes of Coleoptera. I. Wood borers of the genus Agrilus. Evolution 3: 344–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, S.G., 1952a. The cytology of Sitpophilus (Calandra) oryzae (L.), S. granarius (L.), and some other Rhynchophora (Coleoptera). Cytologia 17: 50–70.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, S.G., 1952b. The evolution of the heterochromatin in the genus Tribolium (Tenebriobnidae: Coleoptera). Chromosoma 4: 585–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, S.G., 1953. Chromosome numbers of Coleoptera. Heredity 7: 31–48.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, S.G., 1960. Chromosome numbers of Coleoptera. II. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 2: 66–88.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, S.G., 1966. Natural hybridization in the Coccinellid genus Chilocorus. Chromosoma 18: 380–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sitngo, V., L. Rocco, G. Odierna & M. Bellitti, 1995. NOR and heterochromatin analysis in two cartilaginous fishes by C-, Ag-and RE (restriction endonuclease)-banding. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 71: 228–234.Google Scholar
  40. Stock, A.D., D.B. Burnham & T.C. Hsu, 1972. Giemsa banding of meiotic chromosomes with description of a procedure for cytological preparation from solid tissue. Cytogenetics 11: 534–539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sumner, A.R., H.J. Evans & R.A. Buckland, 1971. A new technique for distinguishing between human chromosomes. Nature 232: 31–32.Google Scholar
  42. Takenouchi, Y., 1958. Further survey of the chromosomes in Curculionid weevils (Coleoptera). Jap. J. Genet. 33: 163–175.Google Scholar
  43. Takenouchi, Y., 1974. A study of the chromosomes of thirtyfour species of Japanese weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Genetica 45: 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. USDA., 1999. West Delta Cooperative Boll Weevil Eradication Program. Environmental Assessment. pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  45. Vahidy, A.A., Q. Jahan & B. Jahan, 1993. Giemsa N-banding polymorphism in six botanical varieties and six cultivars of barley, Hordeum vulgare L. Cytologia 58: 273–279.Google Scholar
  46. Van Den Bussche, R.A., R.L. Honeycutt & R.J. Baker, 1992. Restriction endonuclease digestion patterns of harvest mice (Reithrodontomys) chromosomes: a comparison to G-bands, C-bands, and in situ hybridization. Genetica 87: 141–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Vinas, A., C. Gomez, P. Martinez & L. Sanchez, 1994. Induction of G-bands on Anguilla anguilla chromosomes by the restriction endonucleases HaeIII, HinfI, and MseI. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 65: 79–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wise, D., J.E. Wright & J.R. McCoy, 1982. Meiotic chromosomes of the boll weevil. J. Hered. 73: 234–236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • L.R. McNally
    • 1
  • M.L. Beck
    • 1
  • C.J. Biggers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations