Science & Education

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 581–593

Philosophy of Chemistry: An Emerging Field with Implications for Chemistry Education

  • Sibel Erduran
Article

Abstract

Traditional applications of history and philosophy of science in chemistry education have concentrated on the teaching and learning of history of chemistry. In this paper, the recent emergence of philosophy of chemistry as a distinct field is reported. The implications of this new domain for chemistry education are explored in the context of chemical models. Trends in the treatment of models in chemistry education highlights the need for reconceptualizing the teaching and learning of chemistry to embrace chemical epistemology, a potential contribution by philosophy of chemistry.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M. & Westbrook, S.L.: 1994, ‘A Cross-age Study of the Understanding of Five Chemistry Concepts’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31(2), 147-165.Google Scholar
  2. Akeroyd, F.M.: 1984, ‘Chemistry and Popperism’ Journal of Chemical Education 61(8), 697-698.Google Scholar
  3. Atkins, P.W.: 1991, Atoms, Electrons and Change, Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Battino, R.: 1983, ‘Giant Atomic and Molecular Models and Other Lecture Demonstration Devices Designed for Concrete Operational Students’ Journal of Chemical Education 60(6), 485-488.Google Scholar
  5. Bent, H.A.: 1977, ‘Uses of History in Teaching Chemistry’ Journal of Chemical Education 54, 462-466.Google Scholar
  6. Brush, S.: 1978, ‘Why Chemistry Needs History and How It Can Get Some’ Journal of College Science Teaching 7, 288-291.Google Scholar
  7. Butterfield, H.: 1949, The Origins of Modern Science, G Bell & Sons, London.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, M.: 1984, ‘Model Confusion in Chemistry’ Research in Science Education 14, 97-103.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, P.: 1989, ‘Practical Chemistry in a Historical Context’ in M. Shortland & A. Warwick (eds), Teaching the History of Science, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Erduran, S.: 1995, ‘Science or Pseudoscience: Does Science Education Demarcate? The Case of Chemistry and Alchemy in Teaching’ in F. Finley, D. Allchin, D. Rhees, & S. Fifield (eds), Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference, Vol. 1, University of Minnesota,. Minneapolis, pp. 348-354.Google Scholar
  11. Erduran, S.:1997, ‘Reflections on the Proceedings from HPSST Conferences: A Profile of Papers on Chemistry Education’ in I. Winchester (ed.), Proceedings of International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Group North and South America Regional Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary.Google Scholar
  12. Erduran, S.: 2000, ‘Emergence and Application of Philosophy of Chemistry in Chemistry Education’ School Science Review 81(297), 85-87.Google Scholar
  13. Erduran, S.: 2000, ‘A Missing Component of the Curriculum?’ Education in Chemistry 37(6), 168.Google Scholar
  14. Gentner, D. & Gentner, D.R.: 1983, ‘Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity’ in D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (eds), Mental Models, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 99-129.Google Scholar
  15. Gilbert, J. & Boulter, C.: 1997, ‘Learning Science Through Models and Modelling’ in B. Frazer & K. Tobin (eds), The International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Gilbert, J. & Boulter, C. (eds): 2000, Developing Models in Science Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Glynn, S., Britton, B.K., Semrud-Clikeman, M. & Muth, K.D.: 1989, ‘Analogical Reasoning and Problem Solving in Science Textbooks’ in J.A. Glover, R.R. Ronning & C.R. Reynolds (eds), Handbook of Creativity, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 383-398.Google Scholar
  18. Green, J.H.S.: 1993, ‘What Is Philosophy of Chemistry?’ in E. Scerri (ed.), The Philosophy of Chemistry, Report of the meeting held at the Science Museum Library, Royal Society of Chemistry Historical Group Society for the History of Alchemy and Chemistry, London.Google Scholar
  19. Grosslight, K., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C.: 1991, ‘Understanding Models and Their Use in Science: Conceptions of Middle and High School Students and Experts’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29, 799-822.Google Scholar
  20. Heeren, J.K.: 1990, ‘Teaching Chemistry by the Socratic Method’ Journal of Chemical Education 67(4), 330-331.Google Scholar
  21. Herron, J.D.: 1977, ‘The Place of History in the Teaching of Chemistry’ Journal of Chemical Education 54(1), 15-16.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffmann, R., & Torrence, V.: 1993, Chemistry Imagined: Reflections on Science, Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  23. Jaffe, B.: 1938, ‘The History of Chemistry and Its Place in the Teaching of Chemistry’ Journal of Chemical Education 15, 383-389.Google Scholar
  24. Justi, R. & Gilbert, J.: 1999, ‘A Cause of Ahistorical Science Teaching: Use of Hybrid Models’ Science Education 83(2), 163-177.Google Scholar
  25. Kauffman, G.B.: 1989, ‘History in the Chemistry Curriculum’ Interchange 20(2), 81-94.Google Scholar
  26. Kauffman, G.B. & Szmant, H.H.: 1984, The Central Science: Essays on the Uses of Chemistry, Texas Christian University Press, Fort Worth.Google Scholar
  27. Kornblith, H.: 1985, Naturilizing Epistemology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Leisten, J.: 1994, ‘Teaching Alchemy?’ Chemistry in Britain 30(7), 552-552.Google Scholar
  29. Luder, W.F., McGuire, W.S. & Zuffanti, S.: 1943, ‘Teaching the Electronic Theory of Acids and Bases in the General Chemistry Course’ Journal of Chemical Education, pp. 344-347.Google Scholar
  30. McIntyre, L.: 1999, ‘The Emergence of the Philosophy of Chemistry’ Foundations of Chemistry 1(1), 57-63.Google Scholar
  31. Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, Harcourt New York.Google Scholar
  32. National Research Council: 1996, National Science Education Standards, National Academy Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  33. Nye, M.J.: 1993, From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  34. Oppe, G.: 1936, ‘The Use of Chemical History in the High School’ Journal of Chemical Education 13, 412-414.Google Scholar
  35. Partington, J.R.: 1957, A Short History of Chemistry (3rd edn), MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Primas, H.: 1983, Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  37. Pumfrey, S.: 1989, ‘The Concept of Oxygen: Using History of Science in Science Teaching’ in M. Shortland & A. Warwick (eds), Teaching the History of Science, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 142-155.Google Scholar
  38. Russell, C.A.: 1985, Recent Developments in the History of Chemistry, Royal Society of Chemistry, Whitstable Litho, Whitstable, Kent.Google Scholar
  39. Sammis, J.H.: 1932, ‘A Plan for Introducing Bioraphical Material into Science Cources’ Journal of Chemical Education 9, 900-902.Google Scholar
  40. Scerri, E.: 1991, ‘Chemistry, Spectroscopy and the Question of Reduction’ Journal of Chemical Education 68(2), 122-126.Google Scholar
  41. Scerri, E.: 1994a, ‘Prediction of the Nature of Hafnium from Chemistry, Bohr's Theory and Quantum Theory’ Annals of Science 51, 137-150.Google Scholar
  42. Scerri, E.: 1994b, ‘Has Chemistry Been at Least Approximately Reduced to Quantum Mechanics?’ in D. Hull, M. Forbes & R. Burian (eds), Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 160-170.Google Scholar
  43. Scerri, E.: 1996: ‘Stephen Brush, The Periodic Table and the Nature of Chemistry’ in P. Janich & N. Psarros (eds), 2nd Erlenmeyer Colloquium on the Philosophy of Chemistry, Koningshausen & Neumann, Marburg University, Wurtzburg.Google Scholar
  44. Scerri, E.:1997, ‘Are Chemistry and Philosophy Miscible?’ Chemical Intelligencer 3, 44-46.Google Scholar
  45. Scerri, E.: 2000, ‘The Failure of Reduction and How to Resist the Disunity of Science in Chemical Education’ Science & Education 9(5), 405-425.Google Scholar
  46. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L.E. & Raghavan, K.: 1991, ‘Students' Transition from an Engineering Model to a Science Model of Experimentation’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching 18, 859-882.Google Scholar
  47. Scott, P., Driver, R., Leach, J. & Millar, R.: 1993, ‘Students' Understanding of the Nature of Science’ Working papers 1-11, Children's Learning in Science Research Group, University of Leeds, Leeds.Google Scholar
  48. Shortland, M. & Warwick, A.: 1989, Teaching the History of Science, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, C., Snir, J. & Grosslight, L.: 1992, ‘Using Conceptual Models to Facilitate Conceptual Change: The Case of Weight/density Differentiation’ Cognition and Instruction 9, 221-283.Google Scholar
  50. Stewart, J., Hafner, R., Johnson, S. & Finkel, E.: 1992, ‘Science as Model Building: Computers and High-school Genetics’ Educational Psychologist 27(3), 317-336.Google Scholar
  51. Suckling, C.J., Suckling, K.E. & Suckling, C.W.: 1978, Chemistry Through Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  52. Tomasi, J.: 1988, ‘Models and Modeling in Theoretical Chemistry’ Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 48, 273-92.Google Scholar
  53. Trindle, C.: 1984, ‘The Hierarchy of Models in Chemistry’ Croatica Chemica Acta 57, 1231.Google Scholar
  54. van Brakel, J.: 1994, ‘On the Neglect of the Philosophy of Chemistry’ Paper presented at the First International Conference on Philosophy of Chemistry, London.Google Scholar
  55. van Brakel, J. & Vermeeren, H.: 1981, ‘On the Philosophy of Chemistry’ Philosophy Research Archives, pp. 1405-1456.Google Scholar
  56. van Keulen, H.: 1995, Making Sense: Simulation-of-research in Organic Chemistry Education, CD-β Press, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  57. Wasserman, E. & Schaefer, H.F.: 1986, ‘Methylene Geometry’ Science, p. 233.Google Scholar
  58. Weck, M.A.: 1995, ‘Are Today's Models Tomorrow's Misconceptions?’ Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference, Vol. 2, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, pp. 1286-1294.Google Scholar
  59. Wiser, M.: 1987, ‘The Differentiation of Heat and Temperature: History of Science and Noviceexpert Shift’ in D. Strauss (ed.), Ontogeny, Phylogeny and Historical Development, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 28-48.Google Scholar
  60. Zuckermann, J.J.: 1986, ‘The Coming Renaissance of Descriptive Chemistry’ Journal of Chemical Education 63, 829.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sibel Erduran
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science Education, King's CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations