Landscape Ecology

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 377–390

Detection of edaphic discontinuities with ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction

  • James C. Stroh
  • Steve Archer
  • James A. Doolittle
  • Larry Wilding
Article

Abstract

Quantification of edaphic properties which may regulate the spatial distribution of vegetation is often limited by the expense and labor associated with collecting and analyzing soil samples. Here we evaluate the utility of two technologies, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI), for rapid, extensive and non-destructive mapping of diagnostic subsurface features and soil series map unit boundaries.

Strong reflectance from fine-textured, near-surface soils obscured radar signal reflectance from deeper horizons at our field test site in the Rio Grande Plains of southern Texas, USA. As a result, ground-penetrating radar did not delineate known edaphic contrasts along catena gradients. In contrast, EMI consistently distinguished boundaries of soil map units. In several instances, gradients or contrasting inclusions within map units were also identified. In addition, the location and boundary of calcic or cambic-horizon inclusions embedded within a laterally co-extensive and well-developed argillic horizon were consistently predicted. Correlations between EMI assessments of apparent conductivity (ECa) and soil properties such as CEC, pH, particle size distribution and extractable bases were low (i.e., explained<6% of the variance), or non-significant. As a result, EMI has a high prospecting utility, but cannot necessarily be used to explain the basis for edaphic contrasts.

Results suggest EMI can be a cost-effective tool for soil survey and exploration applications in plant ecology. As such, it is potentially useful for rapidly locating and mapping subsurface discontinuities, thereby reducing the number of ground truth soil samples needed for accurate mapping of soil map unit boundaries. An application, addressing hypotheses proposed to explain the role of edaphic heterogeneity in regulating woody plant distribution in a savanna parkland landscape, is presented.

apparent conductivity argillic horizon edaphic discontinuity plant-soil relationships soil soil mapping soil map unit boundaries soil survey spatial variation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, S. 1995. Tree-grass dynamics in a Prosopis-thornscrub savanna parkland: reconstructing the past and predicting the future. Ecoscience 2: 83—99.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, S., Boutton, T. W. and Hibbard, K. A. 2001. Trees in grasslands: biogeochemical consequences of woody plant expansion, In: Global Biogeochemical Cycles in the Climate System. pp. 115–137. Edited by E.-D. Schulze, S.P. Harrison, M. Heimann, E. A. Holland, J. Lloyd, I. C. Prentice and D. Schimel. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Ammons, J. T., Timpson, M. E. and Newton, D. L. 1939. Application of aboveground electromagnetic conductivity meter to separate Natraqualfs and Ochraqualfs in Gibson County, Tennessee. Soil Survey Horizons 30: 66–70.Google Scholar
  4. Boettinger, J. L., Doolittle, J. A., West, N. E., Bork, E. W. and Schupp, E.W. 1997. Nondestructive assessment of rangeland soil depth to petrocalcic horizon using electrogmagnetic induction. Arid Soil Res. Rehabilit. 11: 375–390.Google Scholar
  5. Bork, E. W., West, N. E., Doolittle, J. A. and Boettinger, J. L. 1998. Soil depth assessment of sagebrush grazing treatments using electromagnetic induction. J. Range Manag. 51: 469–474.Google Scholar
  6. Boutton, T. W., Archer, S. Midwood, A. J, Zitzer, S. F. and Bol, R. 1998. δ13C values of soil organic carbon and their use in documenting vegetation change in a subtropical savanna ecosystem. Geoderma 82: 5–41.Google Scholar
  7. Brady, N. C. 1984. The nature and property of soils. Macmillan, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Bresler, E. B., McNeal, B. L. and Carter, D. L. 1932. Saline and Sodic Soils, Principles-Dynamics-Modeling. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Brus, D. J., Knotter, M., van Dooremolen, W. A., van Kernebeek, P. and van Seeters, M. J. M. 1992. The use of electromagnetic measurements of apparent soil electrical conductivity to predict the boulder clay depth. Geoderma 55: 79–93.Google Scholar
  10. Cannon, M. E., McKenzie, R. C. and Lachapelle, G. 1994. Soil salinity mapping with electromagnetic induction and satellitebased navigation methods. Can. J. Soil Sci. 74: 335–343.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, M. E. and Doolittle, J. A. 1987. Using ground-penetrating radar to study soil microvariability. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51: 491–493.Google Scholar
  12. Cook, P. G., Walker, G. R., Buseli, G., Potts, I. and Dodds, A. R. 1992. The application of electromagnetic techniques to ground water recharge investigations. J. Hydrol. 130: 201–229.Google Scholar
  13. Corwin, D. L. and Rhoades, J. D. 1990. Establishing soil electrical conductivity-depth relations from electromagnetic induction measurements. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21: 861–901.Google Scholar
  14. Daniels, D. J., Gunton, D. J. and Scott, H. F. 1988. Introduction to Subsurface Radar. IEE Proceedings, 135:(F4) 278 – Geophysical Methods. National Water Wells Association, Dublin, OH, USA, pp. 827–840.Google Scholar
  15. de Jong, E., Ballantyne, A. K., Cameron, D. R. and Read, D. W. L. 1979. Measurement of apparent electrical conductivity of soils by an electromagnetic induction probe to aid salinity surveys. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43: 810–812.Google Scholar
  16. Doolittle, J. A. 1987. Using ground-penetrating radar to increase the quality and efficiency of soil surveys. Soil Survey Techniques, SSSA Special Publication No. 20.Google Scholar
  17. Doolittle, J. A., Ealy, G., Secrist, G., Rector, D. and Crouch, M. 1995. Reconnaissance soil mapping of a small watershed using EM and GPS techniques. Soil Survey Horizons 36: 36–94.Google Scholar
  18. Doolittle, J. A., Sudduth, K. A., Kitchen, N. R. and Indorante, S. J. 1994. Estimating depth to claypans using electromagnetic inductive methods. J. Soil Water Cons. 49: 552–555.Google Scholar
  19. El Youssoufi, M. 1992. Factors influencing recruitment of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa var. glandulosa) in a savanna woodland, Texas. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Greenhouse, J. P. and Slaine, D. D. 1983. The use of reconnaissance electromagnetic methods to map contaminant migration. Ground Water Monit. Rev. 3: 47–59.Google Scholar
  21. Guckian, W. J. 1987. Soils of the La Copita Research Area, map and legend. In Soils of the La Capita Research Area, Map and Legend. Edited by C. J. Scifres and B. H. Koerth. MP 1626, p. 6. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Gujarati, D. 1992. Essentials of Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Hendrickx, J. M. H., Baerends, B., Raza, Z. I., Sadig, M. and Chaudhry, M. A. 1992. Soil salinity assessment of electromagnetic induction of irrigated land. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56: 1933–1941.Google Scholar
  24. Hosmer, D. W. and Lemesshow, S. 1988. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Kachanoski, R. G., Gregorich, E. G. and Van Wesenbeeck, I. J. 1988. Estimating spatial variations of soil water content using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive methods. Can. J. Soil Sci. 68: 715–722.Google Scholar
  26. Kawasaki, K. and Osterkamp, T. E. 1988. Mapping shallow permafrost by electromagnetic induction-practical considerations. Cold Regions Sci. Technol. 15: 279–288.Google Scholar
  27. Kitchen, N. R., Sudduth, K. A. and Drummond, S. T. 1996. Mapping of sand deposition from 1993 Midwest floods with electromagnetic induction measurements. J. SoilWater Cons. 51: 336–340.Google Scholar
  28. Loomis, L. E. 1989. Influence of heterogeneous subsoil development on vegetation patterns in a subtropical savanna parkland, Texas. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  29. McAuliffe, J. R. 1994. Landscape evolution, soil formation, and ecological patterns and processes in Sonoran Desert bajadas. Ecol. Monog. 64: 111–1148.Google Scholar
  30. McBride, R. A., Gordon, A. M. and Shrive, S. C. 1990. Estimating forest soil quality from terrain measurements of apparent electrical conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54: 936–938.Google Scholar
  31. McNeill, J. D. 1980. Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers. Geonics Limited.Google Scholar
  32. McNeill, J. D. 1986. Geonics EM38 ground conductivity meter operating instructions and survey interpretation techniques. Geonics Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. McNeill, J. D. 1991. Advances in electromagnetic methods for groundwater studies. Geoexploration 27: 67–80.Google Scholar
  34. Mokma, D. L., Schaetzl, R. J., Doolittle, J. A. and Johnson, E. P. 1990. Ground penetrating radar study of ortstein continuity in some Michigan haplaquods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54: 936–938.Google Scholar
  35. Nettleton, W. D., Bushue, L., Doolittle, J. A., Endres, T. J. and Indorante, S. J. 1994. Sodium-affected soil identification in south-central Illinois by electromagnetic induction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56: 1190–1193.Google Scholar
  36. Rhoades, J. D. and Corwin, D. L. 1981. Determining soil electrical conductivity depth using an inductive electromagnetic soil conductivity meter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45: 255–260.Google Scholar
  37. Rhoades, J. D. and Corwin, D. L. 1990. Soil electrical conductivity: Effects of soil properties and application soil salinity appraisal. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21: 837–860.Google Scholar
  38. SAS Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide. SAS Institute. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Scanlan, J. C. and Archer, S. 1991. Simulated dynamics of succession in a North American subtropical Prosopis savanna. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 625–634.Google Scholar
  40. Scifres, C. J. and Koerth, B. H. 1987. Climate soils and vegetation of the La Copita Research Area. Texas Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. MP-1626. College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Shih, S. F. and Doolittle, J. A. 1984. Using radar to investigate organic soil thickness in the Florida Everglades. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46: 651–656.Google Scholar
  42. Soil Survey Staff. 1981. Soil Survey Manual. Revised edition. U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Handb., 18 (Examination and description of soils in the field. Ch. 4 of unpublished Soil Survey Manual. J. Stroh, Private Collection).Google Scholar
  43. Soil Survey Staff. 1984. Procedures for collecting soil samples and methods of analysis for soil survey. USDA-SCS Soil Survey Inventory Report 1.Google Scholar
  44. Stoker, R. and Archer, S. 1996. Growth rate and age-class distribution of mesquite on contrasting soils. La Copita Research Area 1996 Consolidated Progress Report. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station-Corpus Christi.Google Scholar
  45. Stokes, C. J. 1999. Woody plant dynamics in a south Texas savanna: pattern and process. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station. TX, USA.Google Scholar
  46. Thien, S. J. 1979. A flow diagram for teaching texture-by-feel analysis. J. Agron. Educ. 8: 54–55.Google Scholar
  47. Truman, C. C., Perkins, H. F., Asmussen, I. E. and Allison, H. D. 1988. Using ground-penetrating radar to investigate variability in selected soil properties. J. Soil Water Cons. 43: 341–345.Google Scholar
  48. USDA. 1979. Soil survey of Jim Wells County, Texas. US Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service and the Texas Agriculture Experiment by Station.Google Scholar
  49. Watts, S. E. 1993. Rooting patterns of co-occurring woody plants on contrasting soils in a subtropical savanna. M.S. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, B. G. and Baker, G. C. 1982. An electromagnetic induction technique for reconnaissance surveys of soil salinity hazards. Aust. J. Soil Res. 20: 107–118.Google Scholar
  51. Williams, B. G. and Hoey, D. 1987. The use of electromagnetic induction to detect the spatial variability of the salt clay contents of soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 25: 21–27.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, B. G., Richardson, D. P. and Walker, J. 1990. Spatial variability of apparent electrical conductivity. Technical Memorandum 90/6. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  53. Wollenhaupt, N. C., Richardson, J. L., Foss, J. E. and Doll, E. C. 1986. A rapid method for estimating weighted soil salinity from apparent soil electrical conductivity measured with an above ground electromagnetic induction meter. Can. J. Soil Sci. 66: 315–321.Google Scholar
  54. Zalasiewicz, J. A., M. S. J. and Cornwell, J. D. 1985. The application of ground conductivity measurements to geological mapping. Quart. J. English Geol. 18: 136–148.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • James C. Stroh
    • 1
  • Steve Archer
    • 1
  • James A. Doolittle
    • 2
  • Larry Wilding
    • 3
  1. 1.Rangeland Ecology and ManagementTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.US Forest ServiceRadnorUSA
  3. 3.Department of Soil and Crop SciencesTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations