Higher Education

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 143–169 | Cite as

The conceptual change approach to improving teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development programme


This paper reports a study ofthe effectiveness of an innovative approach tostaff development, the conceptual changeapproach, which attempts to change teachers'frameworks for conceptualising teaching andlearning. The evaluation investigated theprogramme at three levels: the impact on theconceptions of teaching of the participants,the resultant impact on teaching practices, andthe consequential effect on student learning.Encouraging results were obtained. Theprogramme brought about detectable conceptualchange or conceptual development in two-thirdsof the sample group. Subsequently, all the`changed' teachers received better ratings ontheir teaching practices from their students inthe following academic year while none of thosewho did not change their conceptions showedsimilar gains in student rating scores. Aresultant positive impact on their students'studying approaches was observed for half ofthe teachers who changed their conceptions.

conceptions of teaching conceptual change enhancing teaching and learning programme evaluation staff development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, C. (1991). ‘The teacher as decision maker program: An alternative for career-change preservice teachers’, Journal of Teacher Education 42(2), 119–130.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, N., Wood, E. and Rogers, S. (1996). Teachers’ Theories and Classroom Practice: Teaching through Play. Seminar paper presented at the Faculty Seminar, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J.B. (1989). ‘Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching’, Higher Education Research and Development 8(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
  5. Bird, T., Anderson, L.M., Sullivan, B.A. and Swidler, S.A. (1992). Pedagogical Balancing Acts: A Teacher Educator Encounters Problems in an Attempt to Influence Prospective Teachers’ Beliefs. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  6. Bowden, J.A. (1989). Curriculum Development for Conceptual Change Learning: A Phenomenographic Pedagogy. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual (International) Confer-ence of the Hong Kong Educational Research Association, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  7. Briscoe, C. (1991). ‘The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change’, Science Education 75(2), 185–199.Google Scholar
  8. Calderhead, J. and Robson, M. (1991). ‘Images of teaching: Student teachers’ early concep-tions of classroom practice’, Teaching and Teacher Education 7, 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. Cannon, R. and Hore, T. (1997). ‘The long-term effects of ‘one-shot’ professional develop-ment courses: An Indonesian case study’, International Journal for Academic Development 2(1), 35–42.Google Scholar
  10. Dahlgren, L.O. (1984). ‘Outcomes of learning’, in Marton, F. et al. (eds.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dall'Alba, G. (1991). ‘Foreshadowing conceptions of learning’, Research and Development in Higher Education 13, 293–297.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, H., Sivan, A. and Kember, D. (1994). ‘Helping Hong Kong business students to appreciate how they learn’, Higher Education 27, 367–378.Google Scholar
  13. Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E. and Eliovotch, R. (1990). ‘Applying the “Cognitive Conflict” strategy for conceptual change — some implications, difficulties, and problems’, Science Education 74(5), 555–569.Google Scholar
  14. Dunkin, M.J. and Precians, R.P. (1992). ‘Award-winning university teachers’ concepts of teaching’, Higher Education 24, 483–502.Google Scholar
  15. Entwistle, N.J. (1992). Scales and Items for Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (revised August 1992). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  16. Feiman-Nemser, S., McDiarmid, G.W., Melnick, S.L. and Parker, M. (1989). Changing Beginning Teachers’ Conceptions: A Description of an Introductory Teacher Education Course. Research Report 89–1. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  17. Feltovich, P.J., Coulson, R.L., Spiro, R.J. and Adami, J.F.A. (1994). Conceptual Under-standing and Stability, and Knowledge Shields for Fending Off Conceptual Change. Technical Report No. 7. Springfield: Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine.Google Scholar
  18. Florio-Ruane, S. and Lensmire, T.J. (1990). ‘Transforming future teachers’ ideas about writing instruction’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 22, 277–289.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, D. (1983). ‘Personal theories of teaching’, Studies in Higher Education 8(2), 151–163.Google Scholar
  20. Gibbs, G. (1995). ‘Changing lecturers’ conceptions of teaching and learning through action research’, in Brew, A. (ed.), Directions in Staff Development. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gore, J.M. and Zeichner, K.M. (1991). ‘Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States’, Teaching and Teacher Education 7, 119–136.Google Scholar
  22. Gow, L. and Kember, D. (1990). ‘Does higher education promote independent learning?’, Higher Education 19, 307–322.Google Scholar
  23. Gow, L. and Kember, D. (1993). ‘Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 63(1), 20–33.Google Scholar
  24. Guskey, T.R. (1986). ‘Staff development and the process of teacher change’, Educational Researcher (May), 5–12.Google Scholar
  25. Herrmann, B.A. et al. (1993). Building Professional Contexts for Learning for Preservice and Inservice Teachers and Teacher Educators: Reflections, Issues and Questions. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.Google Scholar
  26. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia HERDSA (1992). Challenging Conceptions of Teaching: Some Prompts for Good Practice.Google Scholar
  27. Ho, A.S.P. (1998). Changing Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching as an Approach to Enhancing Teaching and Learning in Tertiary Education (Unpublished PhD. thesis). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  28. Ho, A.S.P. (2000). ‘A conceptual change approach to staff development: a model for programme design’, International Journal of Academic Development 5(1), 30–41.Google Scholar
  29. Holt-Reynolds, D. (1991). Practicing What We Teach. Research Report 91–5. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning, Michigan State University. ERIC document: ED 337460.Google Scholar
  30. Kember, D. (1997). ‘A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ concep-tions of teaching’, Learning and Instruction 7(3), 255–275.Google Scholar
  31. Kember, D., Ha, T.S., Lam, B.H., Lee, A., Ng, S., Yan, L. and Yum, J.C.K. (1997). Action learning Project. Final Evaluation Report. Hong Kong: Action Learning Project Management Committee.Google Scholar
  32. Kember, D. and Kwan, K.P. (1997). Academics’ Approaches to Teaching and their Relation-ship to Conceptions of Teaching. Paper presented at the Symposium on Conceptions of Good Teaching organised by the Educational Development Unit, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
  33. Kennedy, M.M. (1991). An Agenda for Research on Teacher Learning. Texas University, Austin: Center for Foreign Language Studies.Google Scholar
  34. Kettle, B. and Sellars, N. (1996). ‘The development of student teachers’ practical theory of teaching’, Teaching and Teacher Education 12(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  35. Lewin, K. (1947). ‘Frontiers in group dynamics’, in Cartwright, D. (1976) (ed.), Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers by Kurt Lewin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Martens, M.L. and Crosier, S. (1994). ‘Sharon's story: The usefulness of conceptual change constructs in promoting student reflection’, Journal of Science Teacher Education 5(4), 139–145.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, E. and Balla, M. (1991). ‘Conceptions of teaching and implications for learning’, Research and Development in Higher Education 13, 298–304.Google Scholar
  38. Martin, E. and Ramsden, P. (1992). ‘An expanding awareness: How lecturers change their understanding of teaching’, in Parer, M.S. (ed.), Academic Under Pressure: Theory and Practice for the 21st Century. Churchill, Vic: HERSDA.Google Scholar
  39. McLaughlin, H.J. (1991). ‘The reflection on the blackboard: Student teacher self-evaluation’, Alberta Journal of Educational Research 37, 141–159.Google Scholar
  40. Nicol, D.J. (1997). Research on Learning and Higher Education Teaching. UCoSDA Briefing Paper Forty-Five. Sheffield: UCoSDA.Google Scholar
  41. O'Laughlin, M. (1991). Undergraduate and Graduate Student Teacher's Developing Under-standings of Teaching and Learning: Report of a One-Year Journal Study and Follow-Up Interviews. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  42. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A. and Hewson, P.W. (1982). ‘Accommodation of a scientific concep-tion: Toward a theory of conceptual change’, Science Education 66(2), 211–227.Google Scholar
  43. Pratt, D.D. (1992). ‘Conceptions of teaching’, Adult Education Quarterly 42(4), 203–220.Google Scholar
  44. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. and Taylor, P. (1994). ‘A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching’, Learning and Instruction 4, 217–231.Google Scholar
  45. Ramsden, P. (1991). ‘A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire’, Studies in Higher Education 16(2), 129–150.Google Scholar
  46. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Richards, T. and Richards, L. (1991). ‘The NUDIST qualitative data analysis system’, Qualitative Sociology 14(4), 307–325.Google Scholar
  48. Richardson, V. (1990). ‘Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice’, Educational Researcher Oct 1990, 10–18.Google Scholar
  49. Samuelowicz, K. (1997). Revised Dimensions for Establishing Conceptions of Teaching II. Personal correspondence.Google Scholar
  50. Samuelowicz, K. and Bain, J.D. (1992). ‘Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers’, Higher Education 24, 93–111.Google Scholar
  51. Shaw, K.L., Davis, N.T., Sidani-Tabbaa, A. and McCarty, B.J. (1990). A Model of Teacher Change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference, Oaxtepec, Mexico.Google Scholar
  52. Simon, M.A. and Schifter, D. (1991). ‘Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 309–331.Google Scholar
  53. Singer, E.R. (1996). ‘Espoused teaching paradigms of college faculty’, Research in Higher Education 37(6), 659–679.Google Scholar
  54. Stokes, M., Balla, J. and Stafford, K. (1989). Changes in Student Approaches to Learning: A Longitudinal Study of First Year Student Perceptions. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Conference (International) of the Hong Kong Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  55. Taylor, P.C.S. (1990). The Influence of Teacher Beliefs on Constructivist Teaching Prac-tices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  56. Tillema, H.H. and Knol, W.E. (1997). ‘Promoting student teacher learning through conceptual change or direct instruction’, Teaching and Teacher Education 13(6), 579–595.Google Scholar
  57. Trigwell, K. (1995). ‘Increasing faculty understanding of teaching’, in Wright, W.A. (ed.), Teaching Improvement Practices: Successful Faculty Development Strategies.NewYork: Anker.Google Scholar
  58. Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. (1996a). ‘Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching’, Higher Education 32, 77–87.Google Scholar
  59. Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. (1996b). ‘Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective’, Studies in Higher Education 21(3), 275–284.Google Scholar
  60. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. and Taylor, P. (1994). ‘Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science’, Higher Education 27, 85–93.Google Scholar
  61. Watkins, D. and Hattie, J. (1985). ‘A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students’, Human Learning 4, 127–141.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson, S.M. and Ball, D.L. (1991). Changing Visions and Changing Practices: Patchworks in Learning to Teach Mathematics for Understanding. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  63. Wodlinger, M.G. (1990). ‘April: A case study in the use of guided reflection’, Alberta Journal of Educational Research 36, 115–132.Google Scholar
  64. Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1993). Department Excellence in University Education (DEUE) Programme 1992, Final Report. Brisbane Australia, University of Queensland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Development CentreHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong (author for correspondence; E-mail:
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of Hong KongHong Kong
  3. 3.Educational Development CentreHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong

Personalised recommendations