, Volume 122, Issue 3, pp 451–462 | Cite as

Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding

  • J.R. Witcombe
  • D.S. Virk


In the breeding of self-pollinating crops, crossing creates variation upon which selection is exerted. If the value of crosses cannot be predicted then this uncertainty means that many crosses need to be made. However, since there is a limit to the capacity of a breeding programme, more numerous crosses result in each cross having a small population size, fewer progenies in later generations and a lower probability of recovering good genotypes from each cross. Published theory on the optimum number of crosses in a plant breeding programme, for a predominantly self-pollinating crop, usually assumes that all crosses are equal value. This overestimates the number of crosses required. When the optimum size of a population in a favourable cross is considered, theory predicts that very large populations are desirable. The required population size is even larger if linkage of loci controlling different traits is also considered. Hence, in an inbreeding crop, one possible strategy is to select a small number of crosses that are considered favourable and produce large populations from them to increase the probability of recovering superior genotypes. In an out breeding crop, the analogy is a few composites with large population sizes. This low-cross-number strategy is ideally suited to the particular constraints and advantages of participatory plant breeding. Such an approach, although not essential, may still be advantageous in classical breeding. When a breeding programme is based on few crosses, which parents are chosen is crucial and farmer participatory methods are highly effective in narrowing the choice. Modified bulk population breeding methods, and recurrent selection are desirable strategies in the participatory plant breeding of self-pollinating crops when combined with a low-cross-number approach.

choice of parents number of crosses participatory plant breeding population size recombination frequency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allard, R.W., 1999. Principles of Plant Breeding, Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Baenziger, P.S. & C.J. Peterson, 1992. Genetic variation: Its origin and use for breeding self-pollinated species. In: H.T. Stalker & J.P. Murphy (Eds.), Plant Breeding in the 1990's, pp. 69–92. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  3. Bingham, J. & F.G.H. Lupton, 1987. Production of new varieties: an integrated research approach to plant breeding. In: F.G.H. Lupton (Ed.),Wheat Breeding, pp. 487–537. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, J.E. & G.R. Mackay, 1994. Breeding strategies for clonally propagated potatoes. In: J.E. Bradshaw & G.R. Mackay (Eds.), Potato genetics, pp. 467–497. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  5. Burton, G.W., 1951. The adptability and breeding of suitable grasses for the Southeastern states. Adv Agron 3: 197–241.Google Scholar
  6. Busch, R.H. & D.D. Stuthman, 1990. Self-pollinated crop breeding: Concepts and successes. In: J.P. Gustafon (Ed.), Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement II. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Byerlee, D. & P.W. Heisey, 1990. Wheat varietal diversification over time and space as factors in yield gains and rust resistance in the Punjab. In: P.W. Heisey (Ed.), Accelerating the Transfer of Wheat Breeding Gains to Farmers: A Study of the Dynamics of Varietal Replacement in Pakistan, pp. 5–24. CIMMYT Research Report No. 1. International Centre for Wheat and Maize Improvement, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  8. Carver, B.F. & R.F. Bruns, 1993. Emergence of alternative breeding methods for allogamous crops. In: B.C. Imrie & J.B. Hacker (Eds.), Proceedings: Volume 1. Tenth Australian Plant Breeding Conference, Gold Coast, 18–23 April 1993, pp. 43–56. Australian Convention and Travel Services, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  9. Ceccarelli, S., W. Erskine, J. Hamblin & S. Grando, 1994. Genotype environment interaction and international breeding programmes. Expl Agric 30: 177–187.Google Scholar
  10. Delzer, B.W., R.H. Busch & G.A. Hareland, 1995. Recurrent selection for grain protein in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci 35: 730–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudley, J.W. & R.J. Lambert, 1992. Ninety generations of selection for oil and protein in maize. Maydica 37: 81–87.Google Scholar
  12. Fahim, M., M.P. Dhanapala, D. Senadhira & M.J. Lawrence, 1998. Quantitative genetics of rice. II. A comparison of the efficiency of four breeding methods. Field Crops Res 55: 275–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goyal, S.N., A. Joshi & J.R. Witcombe, in press. Participatory crop improvement in maize in Gujarat, India. In: Proc Int Symp on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement: An Exchange of Experience from South and South East Asia held at Pokhara, Nepal from 1 to 5 May 2000. CGIAR System Wide Programme on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation.Google Scholar
  14. Hanson, H., N.E. Borlaug & R.G. Anderson, 1982. Wheat in the Third World, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. pp. 174.Google Scholar
  15. Howell, P.M, D.F. Marshall & D.J. Lydiate, 1996. Towards developing intervarietal substitution lines in Brassica napus using marker-assisted selection. Genome 39: 348–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Huehn, M., 1996. Optimum number of crosses and progeny per cross in breeding self fertilizing crops. I. General approach and first numerical results. Euphytica 91: 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ICRISAT, 1997. Southern and Eastern Africa Region Highlights 1996, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics, Patancheru.Google Scholar
  18. IPGRI, 1996. Proceedings of the IDRC/IPGRI Workshop on Participatory Plant Breeding, 28–30 July, International Agricultural Research Centre, Wageningen. P. Eyzaguirre & M. Iwanaga (Eds.), International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.Google Scholar
  19. IRRI, 1985. Parentage of IRR1 crosses IR1 - IR 50,000. The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  20. Jansen, R.C., 1992. On the selection for specific genes in doubled haploids. Heredity 69: 92–95.Google Scholar
  21. Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Expl Agric 32: 461–477.Google Scholar
  22. Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe, 1998. Farmer participatory approaches for varietal improvement. In: J.R. Witcombe, D.S. Virk & J. Farrington (Eds.), Seeds of Choice-making the most of new varieties for small farmers. Oxford IBH, New Delhi and Intermediate Technology Publications, London.Google Scholar
  23. Liu, C.J., J.R. Witcombe, T.S. Pittaway, M. Nash, C.T. Hash, C.S. Busso & M.D. Gale, 1994. An RFLP-based genetic map of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Theor Appl Genet 89: 481–487.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, M. & B. Walsh, 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  25. Maredia, M.K. & D. Byerlee (Eds.), 1999. The global wheat improvement system: prospects for enhancing efficiency in the presence of spillovers. CIMMYT Research Report No. 5. International Centre for Wheat and Maize Improvement, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  26. Mather, K. & B.J. Harrison, 1949. The manifold effect of selection. Heredity 3: 1–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharma, J.R., 1994. Principles and Practice of Plant Breeding, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  28. Simmonds, N.W., 1981. Principles of crop improvement, 2nd ed., Longman Group Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Sthapit, B.R., K.D. Joshi & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. III. Fanner participatory plant breeding in Nepal. Expl Agric 32: 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Talukdar, B.S., A.M. Rao, P.P. Prakash Babu & J.R. Witcombe, 1998. Registration of ICMR 501 pearl millet topcross pollinator parental line. Crop Sci 38: 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Troyer, A.F., 1996. Breeding widely adapted, popular maize hybrids. Euphytica 92: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Oeveren, A.J., 1992. A comparison between single seed descent and early cross selection in wheat breeding. II. The evaluative generations. Euphytica 64: 91–97.Google Scholar
  33. Weber, W.E., 1979. Number and size of cross progenies from a constant total number of plants manageable in a breeding program. Euphytica 28: 453–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi, K.D. Joshi & B.R. Sthapit, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. I: Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Expl Agric 32: 445–460.Google Scholar
  35. Witcombe, J.R., M.N.V.R. Rao & W. Lechner, 1995. Registration of ICMV 88908 grain cultivar of pearl millet. Crop Sci 35: 1216–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Witcombe, J.R., M.N.V.R. Rao, A.G.B. Raj & C.T. Hash, 1997. Registration of ICMV 88904 pearl millet. Crop Sci 37: 1022–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Witcombe, J.R., 1999. Do farmer-participatory methods apply more to high potential areas than to marginal ones? Outlook on Agriculture 28: 43–50.Google Scholar
  38. Witcombe, J.R., M. Subedi & K.D. Joshi, in press. Towards a practical plant breeding strategy in predominantly self-pollinated crops. In: Proc Int Symp on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement: An Exchange of Experience from South and South East Asia held at Pokhara, Nepal from 1 to 5 May 2000. CGIAR System Wide Programme on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation.Google Scholar
  39. Wood, D. & J.M. Lenné, 1997. The conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm: questioning the emerging paradigm. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wricke, G. & W.E. Weber, 1986. Quantitative Genetics and Selection in Plant Breeding, W. de Gruyter, Berlin - New York.Google Scholar
  41. Yonezawa, K. & H. Yamagata, 1978. On the number and size of cross combinations in a breeding programme of self-fertilizing crops. Euphytica 27: 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yonezawa, K., K. Yano, T. Ishii & T. Nomura, 1999. A theoretical basis for measuring the efficiency of selection in plant breeding. Heredity 82: 401–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhu, J.H., P. Stephenson, D.A. Laurie, W. Li, D. Tang, M.T. Jackson & M.D. Gale, 1999. Towards rice genome scanning by map-based AFLP fingerprinting. Mol Gen Genet 261: 184–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.R. Witcombe
    • 1
  • D.S. Virk
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Arid Zone StudiesUniversity of Wales, BangorGwyneddU.K.

Personalised recommendations